V. Velan, R. Woods‐Robinson, Elizabeth Case, Isabel A. Warner, Andrea Poppiti, Brian Abramowitz
The United States urgently needs science-based solutions for a multitude of policy issues, and a basic societal understanding of science is essential to gaining public trust and addressing these issues. However, there is a disconnect between professional scientists and engineers and K-12 science education. Many students will graduate after 13 years of school having never met a scientist. This missed opportunity is not an issue of supply. There are over 7 million practicing scientists and engineers in the U.S.; if every scientist spent just one hour a year in a classroom, each student would get at least three visits from a scientist every single year. Here, we propose the Federal Science Project: a federally funded, nationwide program to bring scientists into all K-12 schools across the U.S. with the goal of reaching every student, regardless of geographic location. Scientists and engineers across disciplines and sectors would undergo training in communication skills and cultural competency, connect with classrooms via a national database with support from full-time staff, partner with teachers to deliver interactive lessons aligned with existing curriculum and standards, and receive appropriate compensation. Close partnerships between scientists, engineers, teachers, policymakers, and community partners in science education (science centers, museums, etc.) would invigorate the trust-based connections needed for 21st-century science education and policy transformations.
{"title":"The Federal Science Project: A scientist in every classroom","authors":"V. Velan, R. Woods‐Robinson, Elizabeth Case, Isabel A. Warner, Andrea Poppiti, Brian Abramowitz","doi":"10.38126/jspg180308","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.38126/jspg180308","url":null,"abstract":"The United States urgently needs science-based solutions for a multitude of policy issues, and a basic societal understanding of science is essential to gaining public trust and addressing these issues. However, there is a disconnect between professional scientists and engineers and K-12 science education. Many students will graduate after 13 years of school having never met a scientist. This missed opportunity is not an issue of supply. There are over 7 million practicing scientists and engineers in the U.S.; if every scientist spent just one hour a year in a classroom, each student would get at least three visits from a scientist every single year. Here, we propose the Federal Science Project: a federally funded, nationwide program to bring scientists into all K-12 schools across the U.S. with the goal of reaching every student, regardless of geographic location. Scientists and engineers across disciplines and sectors would undergo training in communication skills and cultural competency, connect with classrooms via a national database with support from full-time staff, partner with teachers to deliver interactive lessons aligned with existing curriculum and standards, and receive appropriate compensation. Close partnerships between scientists, engineers, teachers, policymakers, and community partners in science education (science centers, museums, etc.) would invigorate the trust-based connections needed for 21st-century science education and policy transformations.","PeriodicalId":257284,"journal":{"name":"Shaping the Future of Science Policy","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129598721","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Η τρέχουσα προκατάληψη στην ακαδημία γύρω από τα λεγόμενα γνωστικά αντικείμενα STEM (Φυσικές Επιστήμες, Τεχνολογία, Πολυτεχνικές Επιστήμες, Μαθηματικά) ευνοεί τις αγγλικές ερευνητικές δημοσιεύσεις, δημιουργώντας ένα εμπόδιο μεταξύ Αγγλόφωνων και μη-Αγγλόφωνων ερευνητών που είναι επιζήμιο για τη συνέχεια και την εξέλιξη της έρευνας STEM. Σε αυτό το έγγραφο, παρουσιάζουμε μέτρα πολιτικής που χρησιμοποιούν κυβερνητικούς πόρους των ΗΠΑ για τη δημιουργία υποδομής που τυποποιεί και διευκολύνει τη διαδικασία μετάφρασης γλωσσών και τη φιλοξενία πολυγλωσσικών δημοσιεύσεων. Η πρόταση που κάνουμε σε αυτό το κείμενο στοχεύει στην αύξηση της γλωσσικής ποικιλομορφίας στις ακαδημαϊκές εκδόσεις STEM με απώτερο σκοπό τη βελτίωση της παγκόσμιας επιστημονικής επικοινωνίας και τη βελτίωση της υπάρχουσας ανισότητας μεταξύ Αγγλόφωνης και μη-Αγγλόφωνης βιβλιογραφίας STEM.
{"title":"Πρόταση για Διαφοροποίηση της Κοινής Γλώσσας Επικοινωνίας των Ακαδημαϊκών Κοινοτήτων STEM","authors":"Kaylee Henry, Ranya Virk, L. DeMarchi, Huei Sears","doi":"10.38126/jspg180303el","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.38126/jspg180303el","url":null,"abstract":"Η τρέχουσα προκατάληψη στην ακαδημία γύρω από τα λεγόμενα γνωστικά αντικείμενα STEM (Φυσικές Επιστήμες, Τεχνολογία, Πολυτεχνικές Επιστήμες, Μαθηματικά) ευνοεί τις αγγλικές ερευνητικές δημοσιεύσεις, δημιουργώντας ένα εμπόδιο μεταξύ Αγγλόφωνων και μη-Αγγλόφωνων ερευνητών που είναι επιζήμιο για τη συνέχεια και την εξέλιξη της έρευνας STEM. Σε αυτό το έγγραφο, παρουσιάζουμε μέτρα πολιτικής που χρησιμοποιούν κυβερνητικούς πόρους των ΗΠΑ για τη δημιουργία υποδομής που τυποποιεί και διευκολύνει τη διαδικασία μετάφρασης γλωσσών και τη φιλοξενία πολυγλωσσικών δημοσιεύσεων. Η πρόταση που κάνουμε σε αυτό το κείμενο στοχεύει στην αύξηση της γλωσσικής ποικιλομορφίας στις ακαδημαϊκές εκδόσεις STEM με απώτερο σκοπό τη βελτίωση της παγκόσμιας επιστημονικής επικοινωνίας και τη βελτίωση της υπάρχουσας ανισότητας μεταξύ Αγγλόφωνης και μη-Αγγλόφωνης βιβλιογραφίας STEM.","PeriodicalId":257284,"journal":{"name":"Shaping the Future of Science Policy","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125934839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
While many of the original recommendations of Vannevar Bush’s Science—The Endless Frontier report were implemented with great success in the twentieth century, the benefits of scientific innovation have not been fully realized in all corners of the United States. In particular, rural America persistently lags behind other locales in terms of scientific investment and economic development. In the coming decades, more place-conscious science policy will be needed to provide equal opportunities—and equal benefits—to all. This article highlights some of the current challenges relevant to science policy that are faced by rural America, with a specific emphasis on educational policy. The author offers recommendations for a more geographically inclusive science policy agenda and contends that rural equity should be a key priority for science policymakers in the United States.
{"title":"Inclusive Science Policy and Economic Development in the 21st Century: The Case for Rural America","authors":"Andrew Crain","doi":"10.38126/jspg180302","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.38126/jspg180302","url":null,"abstract":"While many of the original recommendations of Vannevar Bush’s Science—The Endless Frontier report were implemented with great success in the twentieth century, the benefits of scientific innovation have not been fully realized in all corners of the United States. In particular, rural America persistently lags behind other locales in terms of scientific investment and economic development. In the coming decades, more place-conscious science policy will be needed to provide equal opportunities—and equal benefits—to all. This article highlights some of the current challenges relevant to science policy that are faced by rural America, with a specific emphasis on educational policy. The author offers recommendations for a more geographically inclusive science policy agenda and contends that rural equity should be a key priority for science policymakers in the United States.","PeriodicalId":257284,"journal":{"name":"Shaping the Future of Science Policy","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121265177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The leadership and advisory boards of American science agencies are largely organized according to the ideas set forth by an influential scientist, Dr. Vannevar Bush, after World War II. Although American science agencies are publicly funded, only experts control what research is funded and how each agency operates. Wielding his unique position of power after the war, Dr. Vannevar Bush suppressed the ideas of his adversary, Senator Harley Kilgore, resulting in the absence of public accountability and citizen input that defines American science agencies today. We argue that citizens must have a seat at the table in the leadership of science agencies to promote trust in science, reduce inequity, increase efficiency, embrace democratic principles, and address the needs of the American people. By providing a mechanism for non-expert citizens to influence the direction of American science agencies, Congress can now finally rectify the double-cross of Senator Harley Kilgore by Dr. Vannevar Bush.
{"title":"Undoing the Double-Cross: Promoting Public Accountability in American Science Agencies","authors":"P. Buckley, Kristen Ramsey","doi":"10.38126/jspg180301","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.38126/jspg180301","url":null,"abstract":"The leadership and advisory boards of American science agencies are largely organized according to the ideas set forth by an influential scientist, Dr. Vannevar Bush, after World War II. Although American science agencies are publicly funded, only experts control what research is funded and how each agency operates. Wielding his unique position of power after the war, Dr. Vannevar Bush suppressed the ideas of his adversary, Senator Harley Kilgore, resulting in the absence of public accountability and citizen input that defines American science agencies today. We argue that citizens must have a seat at the table in the leadership of science agencies to promote trust in science, reduce inequity, increase efficiency, embrace democratic principles, and address the needs of the American people. By providing a mechanism for non-expert citizens to influence the direction of American science agencies, Congress can now finally rectify the double-cross of Senator Harley Kilgore by Dr. Vannevar Bush.","PeriodicalId":257284,"journal":{"name":"Shaping the Future of Science Policy","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132396467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
الملخص التنفيذي: يفضّل التحيز الحالي في أكاديمية ستيم العلوم والتكنولوجيا والهندسة والرياضيات المنشورات البحثية باللغة الإنجليزية، مما يخلق حاجزًا بين الباحثين الناطقين باللغة الإنجليزية وغير الناطقين باللغة الإنجليزية مما يضر باستمرارية وتطور أبحاث.العلوم والتكنولوجيا والهندسة والرياضيات في هذه الورقة نضع السياسات التي تستخدم موارد الحكومة الأمريكية لإنشاء بنية تحتية تعمل على توحيد وتسهيل عملية ترجمة اللغة واستضافة المنشورات متعددة اللغات. يهدف هذا الاقتراح إلى زيادة التنوع اللغوي في منشورات العلوم والتكنولوجيا والهندسة والرياضيات الأكاديمية لتحقيق الهدف النهائي المتمثل في تحسين التواصل العلمي العالمي وتخفيف التفاوت الحالي بين أدب العلوم والتكنولوجيا والهندسة والرياضيات باللغة الإنجليزية وغير الإنجليزية.
{"title":"Lingua Franca دعوة لتنويع لغة لمجتمعات العلوم والتكنولوجيا والهندسة والرياضيات الأكاديمية","authors":"Kaylee Henry, Ranya Virk, L. DeMarchi, Huei Sears","doi":"10.38126/jspg180303ar","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.38126/jspg180303ar","url":null,"abstract":"الملخص التنفيذي: يفضّل التحيز الحالي في أكاديمية ستيم العلوم والتكنولوجيا والهندسة والرياضيات المنشورات البحثية باللغة الإنجليزية، مما يخلق حاجزًا بين الباحثين الناطقين باللغة الإنجليزية وغير الناطقين باللغة الإنجليزية مما يضر باستمرارية وتطور أبحاث.العلوم والتكنولوجيا والهندسة والرياضيات \u0000في هذه الورقة نضع السياسات التي تستخدم موارد الحكومة الأمريكية لإنشاء بنية تحتية تعمل على توحيد وتسهيل عملية ترجمة اللغة واستضافة المنشورات متعددة اللغات. يهدف هذا الاقتراح إلى زيادة التنوع اللغوي في منشورات العلوم والتكنولوجيا والهندسة والرياضيات الأكاديمية لتحقيق الهدف النهائي المتمثل في تحسين التواصل العلمي العالمي وتخفيف التفاوت الحالي بين أدب العلوم والتكنولوجيا والهندسة والرياضيات باللغة الإنجليزية وغير الإنجليزية.","PeriodicalId":257284,"journal":{"name":"Shaping the Future of Science Policy","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127422400","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Le parti pris actuel de l'académie STEM (science technologie ingénierie et mathématique) favorise les publications de recherche en anglais, créant une barrière entre les chercheurs anglophones et non anglophones qui nuit à la continuité et à l'évolution de la recherche STEM. Dans cet article, nous présentons des mesures politiques qui utilisent les ressources du gouvernement américain pour créer une infrastructure qui normalise et facilite le processus de traduction linguistique et l'hébergement de publications multilingues. Cette proposition vise à accroître la diversité linguistique dans les publications académiques STEM dans le but ultime d'améliorer la communication scientifique mondiale et d'améliorer la disparité existante entre la littérature STEM anglaise et non anglaise.
{"title":"Un appel à diversifier la lingua franca des communautés académiques STEM","authors":"Kaylee Henry, Ranya Virk, L. Demarchi, Huei Sears","doi":"10.38126/jspg180303fr","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.38126/jspg180303fr","url":null,"abstract":"Le parti pris actuel de l'académie STEM (science technologie ingénierie et mathématique) favorise les publications de recherche en anglais, créant une barrière entre les chercheurs anglophones et non anglophones qui nuit à la continuité et à l'évolution de la recherche STEM. Dans cet article, nous présentons des mesures politiques qui utilisent les ressources du gouvernement américain pour créer une infrastructure qui normalise et facilite le processus de traduction linguistique et l'hébergement de publications multilingues. Cette proposition vise à accroître la diversité linguistique dans les publications académiques STEM dans le but ultime d'améliorer la communication scientifique mondiale et d'améliorer la disparité existante entre la littérature STEM anglaise et non anglaise.","PeriodicalId":257284,"journal":{"name":"Shaping the Future of Science Policy","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133577377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
As the global scientific and engineering powerhouse, the United States has pioneered numerous inventions such as the telephone, alternating current, radio broadcasting, and controlled nuclear chain reactions. Some may be surprised to find that these were products of immigrants, who pushed the boundaries of science and technology. In the past years, however, the U.S. has been losing its competitive advantage in the global labor market. A key reason for this is that the U.S. is failing to attract and retain international graduate students in STEM fields. Historically, a large portion of these students stayed after graduation and drove innovations that fueled the nation’s trillion-dollar economy. That trend is changing, with many now opting to go elsewhere for their graduate education. Critical flaws in U.S. visa and immigration policy and a lack of federal funding mechanisms for international graduate students are exacerbating this trend. As a result, the U.S. is losing promising junior scientists to other countries with more aggressive foreign recruitment strategies. To counter this trend, we outline in detail the areas with room for growth and propose policy solutions to be implemented by the federal government. These solutions will help the U.S. excel in STEM research workforce diversity, equality, cultural competence, and ultimately, retain its global leadership.
{"title":"Investing in International Graduate Students for the Scientific Endeavour Keeps the United States Competitive","authors":"Nuri Jeong, Esra Sefik, F. Shiu, Thiago Arzua","doi":"10.38126/jspg180304","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.38126/jspg180304","url":null,"abstract":"As the global scientific and engineering powerhouse, the United States has pioneered numerous inventions such as the telephone, alternating current, radio broadcasting, and controlled nuclear chain reactions. Some may be surprised to find that these were products of immigrants, who pushed the boundaries of science and technology. In the past years, however, the U.S. has been losing its competitive advantage in the global labor market. A key reason for this is that the U.S. is failing to attract and retain international graduate students in STEM fields. Historically, a large portion of these students stayed after graduation and drove innovations that fueled the nation’s trillion-dollar economy. That trend is changing, with many now opting to go elsewhere for their graduate education. Critical flaws in U.S. visa and immigration policy and a lack of federal funding mechanisms for international graduate students are exacerbating this trend. As a result, the U.S. is losing promising junior scientists to other countries with more aggressive foreign recruitment strategies. To counter this trend, we outline in detail the areas with room for growth and propose policy solutions to be implemented by the federal government. These solutions will help the U.S. excel in STEM research workforce diversity, equality, cultural competence, and ultimately, retain its global leadership.","PeriodicalId":257284,"journal":{"name":"Shaping the Future of Science Policy","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134326781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The current bias in the STEM academy favors English-language research publications, creating a barrier between English-speaking and non-English speaking researchers that is detrimental to the continuity and evolution of STEM research. In this paper, we lay out policy measures that employ U.S. government resources to create infrastructure that standardizes and facilitates the language translation process and hosting of multilingual publications. This proposal aims to increase linguistic diversity in academic STEM publications for the ultimate goal of improving global scientific communication and ameliorating the existing disparity between English and non-English STEM literature.
{"title":"A Call to Diversify the Lingua Franca of Academic STEM Communities","authors":"Kaylee Henry, R. Virk, L. DeMarchi, Huei Sears","doi":"10.38126/jspg180303","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.38126/jspg180303","url":null,"abstract":"The current bias in the STEM academy favors English-language research publications, creating a barrier between English-speaking and non-English speaking researchers that is detrimental to the continuity and evolution of STEM research. In this paper, we lay out policy measures that employ U.S. government resources to create infrastructure that standardizes and facilitates the language translation process and hosting of multilingual publications. This proposal aims to increase linguistic diversity in academic STEM publications for the ultimate goal of improving global scientific communication and ameliorating the existing disparity between English and non-English STEM literature.","PeriodicalId":257284,"journal":{"name":"Shaping the Future of Science Policy","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125579498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
As extreme weather events become more common in the United States due to the worsening effects of climate change, access to utilities like electricity and water will be continually strained. Blackouts and intermittent utility interruptions impact low-income and communities of color most negatively. While renewable energy technologies promise alleviation of emissions and pollution, high cost and a lack of equitable energy infrastructure make it harder for low-income and communities of color to access renewable energy benefits. I propose a series of policies to address the cost barriers of renewable energy, improve reliability and access to power grids, and standardize household weatherization for people from all communities.
{"title":"Without Environmental Justice, the Renewable Energy Transition Will Leave Low-Income and BIPOC Communities Behind","authors":"C. Ramírez","doi":"10.38126/jspg180306","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.38126/jspg180306","url":null,"abstract":"As extreme weather events become more common in the United States due to the worsening effects of climate change, access to utilities like electricity and water will be continually strained. Blackouts and intermittent utility interruptions impact low-income and communities of color most negatively. While renewable energy technologies promise alleviation of emissions and pollution, high cost and a lack of equitable energy infrastructure make it harder for low-income and communities of color to access renewable energy benefits. I propose a series of policies to address the cost barriers of renewable energy, improve reliability and access to power grids, and standardize household weatherization for people from all communities.","PeriodicalId":257284,"journal":{"name":"Shaping the Future of Science Policy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129260761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Cover Memo: Volume 18, Issue 3, Special Issue on Shaping the Future of Science Policy","authors":"Sudip Parikh, Cynthia Friend","doi":"10.38126/jspg1803cm","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.38126/jspg1803cm","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":257284,"journal":{"name":"Shaping the Future of Science Policy","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128107787","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：