{"title":"SUPERVENIENCE AND MORAL REALISM","authors":"Alison Hills","doi":"10.1515/9783110328875.163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Blackburn has argued that moral properties supervene on natural properties and that this is a problem for moral realists, because they cannot adequately explain why this relationship holds. In this paper, I clarify the supervenience objection to moral realism and evaluate recent responses to it from moral realists.","PeriodicalId":317292,"journal":{"name":"From ontos verlag: Publications of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society - New Series","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"From ontos verlag: Publications of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society - New Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110328875.163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Blackburn has argued that moral properties supervene on natural properties and that this is a problem for moral realists, because they cannot adequately explain why this relationship holds. In this paper, I clarify the supervenience objection to moral realism and evaluate recent responses to it from moral realists.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直觉和道德现实主义
布莱克本认为,道德属性凌驾于自然属性之上,这对道德现实主义者来说是一个问题,因为他们无法充分解释为什么这种关系成立。在本文中,我澄清了对道德现实主义的监督性反对,并评价了道德现实主义者最近对它的回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
'The Mind's Eye': Visualizing the Non-visual and the 'Epistemology of the Line' Substantial Motion and Perpetual Creation Anlass, Begriff und Aufgabe interkultureller Philosophie Intercultural Polylogues in Philosophy Substances, Attributes, and Modes – Substantial Structures in Descartes, Spinoza and Leibniz
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1