{"title":"A Reconsideration of Tax Shield Valuation","authors":"E. R. Arzac, L. Glosten","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.492603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"A quarter-century ago, Miles and Ezzell l1980r solved the valuation problem of a firm that follows a constant leverage ratio L e D/S. However, to this day, the proper discounting of free cash flows and the computation of WACC are often misunderstood by scholars and practitioners alike. For example, it is common for textbooks and fairness opinions to discount free cash flows at WACC with beta input β\" S e [1 p l1 - \"τ\"r\"L\"]\"β\" \"u\" , \"although the latter is not consistent with the assumption of constant leverage. This confusion extends to the valuation of tax shields and the proper implementation of adjusted present value procedures. In this paper, we derive a general result on the value of tax shields, obtain the correct value of tax shields for perpetuities, and state the correct valuation formulas for arbitrary cash flows under a constant leverage financial policy.\" Copyright Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2005.","PeriodicalId":275816,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: European Financial Management Journal","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"138","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: European Financial Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.492603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 138
Abstract
"A quarter-century ago, Miles and Ezzell l1980r solved the valuation problem of a firm that follows a constant leverage ratio L e D/S. However, to this day, the proper discounting of free cash flows and the computation of WACC are often misunderstood by scholars and practitioners alike. For example, it is common for textbooks and fairness opinions to discount free cash flows at WACC with beta input β" S e [1 p l1 - "τ"r"L"]"β" "u" , "although the latter is not consistent with the assumption of constant leverage. This confusion extends to the valuation of tax shields and the proper implementation of adjusted present value procedures. In this paper, we derive a general result on the value of tax shields, obtain the correct value of tax shields for perpetuities, and state the correct valuation formulas for arbitrary cash flows under a constant leverage financial policy." Copyright Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2005.