A Reconsideration of Tax Shield Valuation

E. R. Arzac, L. Glosten
{"title":"A Reconsideration of Tax Shield Valuation","authors":"E. R. Arzac, L. Glosten","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.492603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"A quarter-century ago, Miles and Ezzell l1980r solved the valuation problem of a firm that follows a constant leverage ratio L e D/S. However, to this day, the proper discounting of free cash flows and the computation of WACC are often misunderstood by scholars and practitioners alike. For example, it is common for textbooks and fairness opinions to discount free cash flows at WACC with beta input β\" S e [1 p l1 - \"τ\"r\"L\"]\"β\" \"u\" , \"although the latter is not consistent with the assumption of constant leverage. This confusion extends to the valuation of tax shields and the proper implementation of adjusted present value procedures. In this paper, we derive a general result on the value of tax shields, obtain the correct value of tax shields for perpetuities, and state the correct valuation formulas for arbitrary cash flows under a constant leverage financial policy.\" Copyright Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2005.","PeriodicalId":275816,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: European Financial Management Journal","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"138","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: European Financial Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.492603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 138

Abstract

"A quarter-century ago, Miles and Ezzell l1980r solved the valuation problem of a firm that follows a constant leverage ratio L e D/S. However, to this day, the proper discounting of free cash flows and the computation of WACC are often misunderstood by scholars and practitioners alike. For example, it is common for textbooks and fairness opinions to discount free cash flows at WACC with beta input β" S e [1 p l1 - "τ"r"L"]"β" "u" , "although the latter is not consistent with the assumption of constant leverage. This confusion extends to the valuation of tax shields and the proper implementation of adjusted present value procedures. In this paper, we derive a general result on the value of tax shields, obtain the correct value of tax shields for perpetuities, and state the correct valuation formulas for arbitrary cash flows under a constant leverage financial policy." Copyright Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2005.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对税盾估值的再思考
25年前,Miles和Ezzell在1980年解决了一家公司的估值问题,该公司遵循恒定的杠杆比率(L / D/S)。然而,直到今天,自由现金流的适当折现和WACC的计算经常被学者和从业者所误解。例如,教科书和公平意见通常用β输入β“S”e [1 p l1 -“τ”r“L”]“β”“u”来贴现WACC的自由现金流,尽管后者与恒定杠杆的假设不一致。这种混淆延伸到税盾的估值和调整后现值程序的适当实施。在本文中,我们得到了关于税盾价值的一般结果,得到了永续投资税盾的正确价值,并给出了恒定杠杆金融政策下任意现金流量的正确估值公式。版权所有布莱克威尔出版有限公司,2005。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivity Caused by Agency Costs or Asymmetric Information? Evidence from the UK A Reconsideration of Tax Shield Valuation Paying People to Lie: The Truth About the Budgeting Process A Conditional Assessment of the Relationships between the Major World Bond Markets Who Controls Us?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1