Talaab in India: Multifunctional Landscapes as Laminates

Alpa Nawre
{"title":"Talaab in India: Multifunctional Landscapes as Laminates","authors":"Alpa Nawre","doi":"10.3368/lj.32.2.137-a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The talaab, or a ‘pond’, has been an integral part of the Indian life and landscape for centuries. Primarily for collecting rainwater, it acts as a rich venue for multiple activities, the complexity of which defies its simple design elements. While landscape architects are primarily concerned with understanding these design elements, a study limited to the physical design of a talaab will not enable a complete envisioning of its multiple roles. The concept of “frames,” put forth by the sociologist Erving Goffman as cultural definitions of reality, is used to address this gap and to examine, through a historical analysis, the change in ownership and management of water in India. Based on linguist Stef Slembrouck’s discussion of frames as spatial metaphors, this paper speculates that the talaab landscape acts simultaneously as a space for normative or expected/typical activities and as a situational/interactional entity. The paper further characterizes the land-water interface of a talaab as a “laminate” hosting normative activities and acting as a situational/interactional space determined by culturally governed temporal and ideological principles. The use of this model to interpret space as a physical and socio-cultural construct allows a better understanding of the possibilities for creating multifunctional landscapes embedded with social and spiritual meaning.","PeriodicalId":442323,"journal":{"name":"Landscape Journal: design, planning, and management of the land","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape Journal: design, planning, and management of the land","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.32.2.137-a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The talaab, or a ‘pond’, has been an integral part of the Indian life and landscape for centuries. Primarily for collecting rainwater, it acts as a rich venue for multiple activities, the complexity of which defies its simple design elements. While landscape architects are primarily concerned with understanding these design elements, a study limited to the physical design of a talaab will not enable a complete envisioning of its multiple roles. The concept of “frames,” put forth by the sociologist Erving Goffman as cultural definitions of reality, is used to address this gap and to examine, through a historical analysis, the change in ownership and management of water in India. Based on linguist Stef Slembrouck’s discussion of frames as spatial metaphors, this paper speculates that the talaab landscape acts simultaneously as a space for normative or expected/typical activities and as a situational/interactional entity. The paper further characterizes the land-water interface of a talaab as a “laminate” hosting normative activities and acting as a situational/interactional space determined by culturally governed temporal and ideological principles. The use of this model to interpret space as a physical and socio-cultural construct allows a better understanding of the possibilities for creating multifunctional landscapes embedded with social and spiritual meaning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度塔拉布:作为层压板的多功能景观
几个世纪以来,talaab(即“池塘”)一直是印度人生活和景观中不可或缺的一部分。它主要用于收集雨水,作为多种活动的丰富场所,其复杂性违背了其简单的设计元素。虽然景观设计师主要关心的是理解这些设计元素,但仅限于talaab的物理设计的研究将无法完整地设想其多种作用。社会学家欧文·戈夫曼(Erving Goffman)提出的“框架”概念是对现实的文化定义,用来解决这一差距,并通过历史分析来审视印度水资源所有权和管理的变化。基于语言学家Stef Slembrouck关于框架作为空间隐喻的讨论,本文推测talaab景观同时作为规范性或预期/典型活动的空间和情境/互动实体。论文进一步将talaab的陆水界面描述为承载规范性活动的“层压板”,并作为由文化支配的时间和意识形态原则决定的情境/互动空间。使用这种模型将空间解释为物理和社会文化结构,可以更好地理解创造嵌入社会和精神意义的多功能景观的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editors’ Introduction Talaab in India: Multifunctional Landscapes as Laminates Little White Houses: How the Postwar Home Constructed Race in America by Dianne Harris (review) Editor’s Introduction Editor’s Introduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1