A Study on the Relationship Between Academic Ostracism and Organizational Power Sources in Higher Education

Engin Karadağ
{"title":"A Study on the Relationship Between Academic Ostracism and Organizational Power Sources in Higher Education","authors":"Engin Karadağ","doi":"10.5961/jhes.2021.455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to examine the predictive level of organizational power resources in higher education institutions in academicians’ perceptions of academic ostracism. In the study designed with a correlational design, data was obtained from 725 academicians using the “Workplace Ostracism Scale” (Ferris, Brown, Berry, & Lian, 2008) and the “Organizational Power Scale” (Altınkurt & Yılmaz, 2013). The obtained data were analysed by correlation and regression analysis. In the study, it was found that the academicians were exposed to legal force the most, and to the coercive force the least; It was found that they experienced a low level of academic ostracism. Again, multiple regression results showed that organizational power sources significantly predicted the academicians’ perceptions of ostracism. Among the power sources, “coercive power” explains 16% of the variance of academic ostracism perceptions. Based on the findings, it can be said that especially coercive power is the main source of academic ostracism.","PeriodicalId":119364,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Higher Education and Science","volume":"172 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Higher Education and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2021.455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the predictive level of organizational power resources in higher education institutions in academicians’ perceptions of academic ostracism. In the study designed with a correlational design, data was obtained from 725 academicians using the “Workplace Ostracism Scale” (Ferris, Brown, Berry, & Lian, 2008) and the “Organizational Power Scale” (Altınkurt & Yılmaz, 2013). The obtained data were analysed by correlation and regression analysis. In the study, it was found that the academicians were exposed to legal force the most, and to the coercive force the least; It was found that they experienced a low level of academic ostracism. Again, multiple regression results showed that organizational power sources significantly predicted the academicians’ perceptions of ostracism. Among the power sources, “coercive power” explains 16% of the variance of academic ostracism perceptions. Based on the findings, it can be said that especially coercive power is the main source of academic ostracism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高等教育中学术排斥与组织权力来源关系研究
摘要本研究旨在探讨高等院校组织权力资源对院士学术排斥认知的预测作用。在采用相关设计设计的研究中,使用“工作场所排斥量表”(Ferris, Brown, Berry, & Lian, 2008)和“组织权力量表”(Altınkurt & Yılmaz, 2013)从725名院士中获得数据。对所得数据进行相关分析和回归分析。研究发现,院士受到的法律压力最大,受到的强制压力最小;研究发现,他们经历了较低程度的学术排斥。多元回归结果再次显示,组织权力来源显著预测了院士的排斥感。在权力来源中,“强制权力”解释了16%的学术排斥观念差异。根据研究结果,可以说,特别是强制性权力是学术排斥的主要来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correlation between Mental Health Literacy Levels and Attitudes of Seeking Psychological Help of Health Services Vocational School Students: Descriptive Cross-sectional Research Investigation of Perceived Stress and Methods of Collecting Stress in Nursing Students Entering Hospital Period During the COVID-19 Pandemic Period Determination of Cyberloafing Levels and Reasons of Higher Education Students in the Distance Education Process QR Code Applications in Designing Mathematics Learning Activities Methodological Discussions on the Use of Tricky Topics Technique for the Focus Group Discussions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1