If the Genes Fit, Wear Them: A Proposal for Light-Handed Regulation of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests from the Federal Trade Commission as a Solution to a Regulatory Commons Problem

Craig C. Carpenter
{"title":"If the Genes Fit, Wear Them: A Proposal for Light-Handed Regulation of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Tests from the Federal Trade Commission as a Solution to a Regulatory Commons Problem","authors":"Craig C. Carpenter","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1962985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article suggests that increased, fragmented regulation of Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing, as proposed by many commentators and interest groups, will not benefit consumers and risks hampering American innovation. This article briefly discusses some of the problems that can occur with broad, multi-agency regulation and specifically why it is unwarranted and ill-advised for Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing. Rather than focusing on hypothetical consumer harms, this article takes a holistic approach, taking into consideration the welfare of consumers and our nation’s interest in promoting innovation. The article goes on to propose a solution that refreshingly simple yet will maximize the benefits of the innovation while minimizing risks to consumers. The article theorizes that by simplifying the regulation scheme and decreasing the number of agencies involved, the remaining agencies will take greater ownership over the regulation and consumers will benefit.","PeriodicalId":302242,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Regulation (Topic)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Regulation (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1962985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article suggests that increased, fragmented regulation of Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing, as proposed by many commentators and interest groups, will not benefit consumers and risks hampering American innovation. This article briefly discusses some of the problems that can occur with broad, multi-agency regulation and specifically why it is unwarranted and ill-advised for Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing. Rather than focusing on hypothetical consumer harms, this article takes a holistic approach, taking into consideration the welfare of consumers and our nation’s interest in promoting innovation. The article goes on to propose a solution that refreshingly simple yet will maximize the benefits of the innovation while minimizing risks to consumers. The article theorizes that by simplifying the regulation scheme and decreasing the number of agencies involved, the remaining agencies will take greater ownership over the regulation and consumers will benefit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如果基因适合,就戴上它们:联邦贸易委员会提出的对直接面向消费者的基因测试进行宽松监管的建议,以解决监管公地问题
这篇文章表明,正如许多评论家和利益集团所提议的那样,增加对直接面向消费者的基因检测的分散监管,将不会使消费者受益,而且有阻碍美国创新的风险。本文简要讨论了广泛的多机构监管可能出现的一些问题,特别是为什么直接面向消费者的基因检测是毫无根据和不明智的。这篇文章没有把重点放在假设的消费者伤害上,而是采取了一种整体的方法,考虑到消费者的福利和我们国家在促进创新方面的利益。文章继续提出了一个解决方案,令人耳目一新的简单,但将最大限度地提高创新的好处,同时最大限度地降低消费者的风险。本文从理论上认为,通过简化监管方案和减少所涉及的机构数量,剩余的机构将对监管拥有更大的所有权,消费者将受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Incentives and Communication Costs on Information Production and Use: Evidence from Bank Lending Reserves, Liquidity and Money: An Assessment of Balance Sheet Policies State Aid to Business in the European Union: A Focus on the Car Sector A Conceptual Framework for Efficient Design of Counter-Obligations in Government Contracts and Licenses Banks’ Reactions to Basel-III
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1