Learning through perplexities in inquiry-based learning settings in teacher education

IF 1.9 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Teachers and Teaching Pub Date : 2023-10-05 DOI:10.1080/13540602.2023.2266379
Angelika Paseka, Jan-Hendrik Hinzke, Vanessa-Patricia Boldt
{"title":"Learning through perplexities in inquiry-based learning settings in teacher education","authors":"Angelika Paseka, Jan-Hendrik Hinzke, Vanessa-Patricia Boldt","doi":"10.1080/13540602.2023.2266379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe concept of inquiry-based learning has become widespread in teacher education in Europe and beyond. Inquiry-based learning courses aim to raise the research competence of (preservice) teachers and to increase their ability for reflection, uncertainties occur that have to be learned to cope with. Uncertainties can be disorienting and may cause perplexities, doubts and crises. However, they can be the starting point for learning processes. This paper addresses whether preservice teachers experience such uncertainties in research courses and how they discuss them. To obtain data, 10 group discussions were carried out with 35 preservice teachers enrolled in research courses at a German university. The discussions were analysed using the documentary method. Preservice teachers experience a range of perplexities as expression of underlying uncertainties within and through the research process (concerning data collection and data analysis) and the course design. Results also show two different ways of dealing with such perplexities: While in some group discussions the preservice teachers accept the perplexities as challenges and starting points for learning, others distance from them. The paper discusses how the experienced perplexities and uncertainties focus on central aspects and tensions of teaching. Implications for teacher education at university level are presented.KEYWORDS: Inquiry-based learningteacher educationuncertaintyperplexitiesdocumentary methodgroup discussions Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Evidence can also be found in publications that focus on several programs of undergraduate education other than teacher education (Brew & Mantai, Citation2017), for Australia (Spronken-Smith et al., Citation2012), for New Zealand (Levy & Petrulis, Citation2012), for UK.2. According to Koller (Citation2017), the German term ‘Bildung’ can be described as ‘an experience that the subject comes out of changed; a change which not only affects one’s thinking, but rather the subject’s relation to the world, to others, and to itself’ (Koller, Citation2017, p. 33).3. Teacher education in Germany is usually two-phased, consisting of a Bachelor degree (after six semesters) and a Master degree (after further four semesters). To become a full teacher, an additional supervised pedagogical training in schools (probationary teaching), lasting at a minimum one year, is obligatory.4. Two authors of this paper were instructors in a course and as researchers responsible for data collection and data analysis of the whole study.5. It is a characteristic of documentary method that it goes beyond the analysis of single cases by formulating more abstract results based on using case-external comparisons (e.g. Bohnsack, Citation2018). That is why the documentary method uses cases (e.g. group discussions), but is not seen as a ‚case study‘.6. We used the following transcription signs:/= abruption of an utterance, a word or a sentence;//= overlapping speech; […] = omission.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the Kompetenzzentrum Nachhaltige Universität der Universität Hamburg (Competence Center for a Sustainable University, University of Hamburg).","PeriodicalId":47914,"journal":{"name":"Teachers and Teaching","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teachers and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2023.2266379","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe concept of inquiry-based learning has become widespread in teacher education in Europe and beyond. Inquiry-based learning courses aim to raise the research competence of (preservice) teachers and to increase their ability for reflection, uncertainties occur that have to be learned to cope with. Uncertainties can be disorienting and may cause perplexities, doubts and crises. However, they can be the starting point for learning processes. This paper addresses whether preservice teachers experience such uncertainties in research courses and how they discuss them. To obtain data, 10 group discussions were carried out with 35 preservice teachers enrolled in research courses at a German university. The discussions were analysed using the documentary method. Preservice teachers experience a range of perplexities as expression of underlying uncertainties within and through the research process (concerning data collection and data analysis) and the course design. Results also show two different ways of dealing with such perplexities: While in some group discussions the preservice teachers accept the perplexities as challenges and starting points for learning, others distance from them. The paper discusses how the experienced perplexities and uncertainties focus on central aspects and tensions of teaching. Implications for teacher education at university level are presented.KEYWORDS: Inquiry-based learningteacher educationuncertaintyperplexitiesdocumentary methodgroup discussions Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Evidence can also be found in publications that focus on several programs of undergraduate education other than teacher education (Brew & Mantai, Citation2017), for Australia (Spronken-Smith et al., Citation2012), for New Zealand (Levy & Petrulis, Citation2012), for UK.2. According to Koller (Citation2017), the German term ‘Bildung’ can be described as ‘an experience that the subject comes out of changed; a change which not only affects one’s thinking, but rather the subject’s relation to the world, to others, and to itself’ (Koller, Citation2017, p. 33).3. Teacher education in Germany is usually two-phased, consisting of a Bachelor degree (after six semesters) and a Master degree (after further four semesters). To become a full teacher, an additional supervised pedagogical training in schools (probationary teaching), lasting at a minimum one year, is obligatory.4. Two authors of this paper were instructors in a course and as researchers responsible for data collection and data analysis of the whole study.5. It is a characteristic of documentary method that it goes beyond the analysis of single cases by formulating more abstract results based on using case-external comparisons (e.g. Bohnsack, Citation2018). That is why the documentary method uses cases (e.g. group discussions), but is not seen as a ‚case study‘.6. We used the following transcription signs:/= abruption of an utterance, a word or a sentence;//= overlapping speech; […] = omission.Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the Kompetenzzentrum Nachhaltige Universität der Universität Hamburg (Competence Center for a Sustainable University, University of Hamburg).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师教育探究性学习情境下的困惑学习
摘要探究性学习的理念在欧洲及其他地区的教师教育中得到了广泛的应用。探究性学习课程旨在提高(职前)教师的研究能力,并提高他们对发生的不确定因素的反思能力,这些不确定因素必须通过学习来应对。不确定性会使人迷失方向,并可能导致困惑、怀疑和危机。然而,它们可以成为学习过程的起点。本文讨论了职前教师在研究性课程中是否会经历这种不确定性,以及他们如何讨论这种不确定性。为了获得数据,对35名在德国一所大学参加研究课程的职前教师进行了10次小组讨论。采用文献法对讨论进行了分析。职前教师在研究过程(涉及数据收集和数据分析)和课程设计中,会经历一系列的困惑,这些困惑表达了潜在的不确定性。结果还显示了两种不同的处理这种困惑的方式:在一些小组讨论中,职前教师接受困惑作为学习的挑战和起点,而其他人则远离它们。本文论述了所经历的困惑和不确定性如何集中在教学的中心方面和紧张关系上。提出了对大学教师教育的启示。关键词:探究式学习;教师教育;不确定性;在关注教师教育以外的几个本科教育项目(Brew & Mantai, Citation2017)、澳大利亚(Spronken-Smith等人,Citation2012)、新西兰(Levy & Petrulis, Citation2012)、英国(2)的出版物中也可以找到证据。根据Koller (Citation2017)的说法,德语术语“塑造”可以被描述为“主体从变化中产生的一种体验;这种变化不仅会影响一个人的思维,还会影响主体与世界、与他人、与自身的关系”(Koller, Citation2017,第33页)。德国的教师教育通常分为两个阶段,包括学士学位(六个学期)和硕士学位(再经过四个学期)。要成为一名正式教师,必须在学校接受至少一年的有监督的额外教学培训(见习教学)。本文的两位作者是一门课程的讲师,同时也是研究人员,负责整个研究的数据收集和数据分析。文献法的一个特点是,它超越了对单个案例的分析,通过使用案例外部比较来制定更抽象的结果(例如Bohnsack, Citation2018)。这就是为什么文献法使用案例(如小组讨论),但不被视为“案例研究”。我们使用了以下转录符号:/=一个话语、一个单词或一个句子的断续;//=重叠的话语;=省略。本研究得到了汉堡大学可持续发展大学能力中心Universität der Universität的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Teachers and Teaching
Teachers and Teaching EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice provides an international focal point for the publication of research on teachers and teaching, in particular on teacher thinking. It offers a means of communication and dissemination of completed research and research in progress, whilst also providing a forum for debate between researchers. This unique journal draws together qualitative and quantitative research from different countries and cultures which focus on the social, political and historical contexts of teaching as work. It includes theoretical reflections on the connections between theory and practice in teachers" work and other research of professional interest.
期刊最新文献
A psychosocial reading of teacher agency Empowering emerging teacher leaders: insights from a self-study community of practice Racial microaggressions on the initial teacher education programmes: implications for minority ethnic teacher retention ‘Not elsewhere specified’: a case study of preservice teachers’ perceptions and practices of outdoor learning Looking back to move forward: re-examining “alternative” certification as a site for teacher learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1