‘Shadowy objects in test tubes’: A biopolitical critique of Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Technoetic Arts Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1386/tear_00101_1
Dona George
{"title":"‘Shadowy objects in test tubes’: A biopolitical critique of Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go","authors":"Dona George","doi":"10.1386/tear_00101_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to explore Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go within the Foucauldian theoretical framework in order to analyse the manifold biopolitical issues, namely cloning, by stretching the discourse to a speculative, dystopian posthuman scenario wherein the dominant, privileged, affluent human society replenishes them by incorporating bio-matter from the clones. The article also proposes to unfold the myriad ways the institutions, namely Hailsham and recovery centres in the novel, exercise power and execute power relations with the clones. It describes the way these institutions turn out to be what Foucault calls the regimes of truth and how the clones choose to remain docile to the institutional power, and consequently, they turn out to be rich sites for both medical gaze and disciplinary gaze. Nevertheless, the article also details the procedures by which the bizarre truth of organ donation of the clones is buried under the technical discourse of good work.","PeriodicalId":41263,"journal":{"name":"Technoetic Arts","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technoetic Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/tear_00101_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article aims to explore Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go within the Foucauldian theoretical framework in order to analyse the manifold biopolitical issues, namely cloning, by stretching the discourse to a speculative, dystopian posthuman scenario wherein the dominant, privileged, affluent human society replenishes them by incorporating bio-matter from the clones. The article also proposes to unfold the myriad ways the institutions, namely Hailsham and recovery centres in the novel, exercise power and execute power relations with the clones. It describes the way these institutions turn out to be what Foucault calls the regimes of truth and how the clones choose to remain docile to the institutional power, and consequently, they turn out to be rich sites for both medical gaze and disciplinary gaze. Nevertheless, the article also details the procedures by which the bizarre truth of organ donation of the clones is buried under the technical discourse of good work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“试管里模糊的物体”:石黑一雄《别让我走》的生物政治批判
本文旨在在福柯理论框架内探讨石黑一雄的《别让我走》,通过将话语延伸到一个思考性的、反乌托邦的后人类场景,分析克隆等多种生物政治问题,在这个场景中,占统治地位的、享有特权的、富裕的人类社会通过从克隆中获取生物物质来补充它们。文章还试图揭示小说中的海尔舍姆和康复中心等机构与克隆人行使权力和执行权力关系的种种方式。它描述了这些机构如何成为福柯所说的真理政权,以及克隆人如何选择对制度权力保持温顺,因此,它们成为医学凝视和学科凝视的丰富场所。尽管如此,这篇文章还详细介绍了克隆人器官捐赠的奇异真相被掩盖在良好工作的技术话语之下的程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Technoetic Arts
Technoetic Arts HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
More than human: Analysing Edward Weyland as a post-human self-humanizing vehicle in Suzy McKee Charnas’s The Vampire Tapestry ‘Shadowy objects in test tubes’: A biopolitical critique of Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go Re-conceptualizing the villain: Todd Phillips’s Joker through the lens of Vedic hermeneutics The Last Recreational Land VR experience: A non-naturalistic artistic visualization practice with emerging technologies Beyond markets: The DADA case for NFTs in art
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1