Misconceptions and Consequences of the ‘Other’ in the Sinhala Buddhist-Muslim Relationship in Sri Lanka

Sithy Rifa Mahroof, Ahamed Sarjoon Razick
{"title":"Misconceptions and Consequences of the ‘Other’ in the Sinhala Buddhist-Muslim Relationship in Sri Lanka","authors":"Sithy Rifa Mahroof, Ahamed Sarjoon Razick","doi":"10.14421/esensia.v23i2.3142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sri Lanka’s plurality is reflected in its religious and ethnic diversity. In recent times, there has been polarization between the majority Sinhala Buddhists and the minority Muslim groups. The objective of this study is to identify the reasons for blaming the “other” in the relationship between the two groups and propose remedies. The study adopted a descriptive and interpretive paradigm within the qualitative approach. Secondary sources were used to examine the phenomenon under study. The theoretical framework was drawn from Said’s concepts of “self” and “other”. The dominance of the Sinhala language and the utmost position given to Buddhism has made the extremist Buddhists take supremacy over the Muslims who are perceived as a threat to their “self”. The Buddhists need to be open to accepting the “otherness” of the Muslims. The consequences of the misconceptions targeted against the Muslims act as barriers to the Buddhist- Muslim relationship in Sri Lanka. The shift in attitudes of the Buddhists is not due to their own judgment but one constructed by social media. The Muslims’ ethnoreligious identity is questioned for radicalization. Inter-religious education and inter-faith dialogue between followers of Buddhism and Islam need to be promoted as both religions command engagement with the “other” on the basis of peace, tolerance, and non-violence, regardless of the differences that may exist. Understanding the fundamental unity of humankind and their ethnoreligious plurality as the two sides of the same coin, they need to engage with and understand one another as a “Sri Lankan”.","PeriodicalId":33284,"journal":{"name":"Esensia Jurnal IlmuIlmu Ushuluddin","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Esensia Jurnal IlmuIlmu Ushuluddin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14421/esensia.v23i2.3142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sri Lanka’s plurality is reflected in its religious and ethnic diversity. In recent times, there has been polarization between the majority Sinhala Buddhists and the minority Muslim groups. The objective of this study is to identify the reasons for blaming the “other” in the relationship between the two groups and propose remedies. The study adopted a descriptive and interpretive paradigm within the qualitative approach. Secondary sources were used to examine the phenomenon under study. The theoretical framework was drawn from Said’s concepts of “self” and “other”. The dominance of the Sinhala language and the utmost position given to Buddhism has made the extremist Buddhists take supremacy over the Muslims who are perceived as a threat to their “self”. The Buddhists need to be open to accepting the “otherness” of the Muslims. The consequences of the misconceptions targeted against the Muslims act as barriers to the Buddhist- Muslim relationship in Sri Lanka. The shift in attitudes of the Buddhists is not due to their own judgment but one constructed by social media. The Muslims’ ethnoreligious identity is questioned for radicalization. Inter-religious education and inter-faith dialogue between followers of Buddhism and Islam need to be promoted as both religions command engagement with the “other” on the basis of peace, tolerance, and non-violence, regardless of the differences that may exist. Understanding the fundamental unity of humankind and their ethnoreligious plurality as the two sides of the same coin, they need to engage with and understand one another as a “Sri Lankan”.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯里兰卡僧伽罗佛教-穆斯林关系中“他者”的误解与后果
斯里兰卡的多元性反映在其宗教和种族的多样性上。近年来,占多数的僧伽罗佛教徒和占少数的穆斯林群体之间出现了两极分化。本研究的目的是找出在两组关系中指责“他者”的原因,并提出补救措施。本研究采用定性研究方法中的描述性和解释性范式。二手资料被用来检验所研究的现象。其理论框架来源于赛义德的“自我”和“他者”概念。僧伽罗语的主导地位和给予佛教的最高地位使得极端的佛教徒凌驾于穆斯林之上,后者被视为对他们“自我”的威胁。佛教徒需要开放地接受穆斯林的“差异性”。针对穆斯林的误解所造成的后果,成为斯里兰卡佛教与穆斯林关系的障碍。佛教徒态度的转变不是由于他们自己的判断,而是由社交媒体构建的。穆斯林的民族宗教身份因激进化而受到质疑。佛教和伊斯兰教信徒之间的宗教间教育和宗教间对话需要得到促进,因为两种宗教都要求在和平、宽容和非暴力的基础上与“对方”接触,而不管可能存在的差异。他们把人类的基本统一和民族宗教多元性视为同一枚硬币的两面,需要以“斯里兰卡人”的身份相互接触和理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Mempertimbangkan Waktu Kemunculan Hadis dalam Penggunaannya sebagai Bayan Al-Quran untuk Istimbath Hukum Integrasi Islam dan Politik dalam Perspektif Hamka Western Materialism and Modernism's Philosophical Sources Konstruksi Penemuan Hukum Islam dari Perilaku Kemanusian Nabi Ditinjau dari Maqashid Syariah Relevansi antara Ilmu Kedokteran dengan Struktur Kulit Manusia dalam Al-Qur’an
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1