{"title":"Modern Trends in Research Assessment: A Case of the Netherlands","authors":"D. M. Kochetkov","doi":"10.22394/2410-132x-2023-9-3-76-88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the departure of commercial scientific information databases such as Scopus and Web of Science from Russia, the problem of building a new system for research assessment is more relevant than ever. At the same time, the new system does not have to copy the previous one with other data sources. The purpose of the article is to analyze global trends in the field of research evaluation. The authors have examined key supranational documents and practices in introducing a responsible approach to research assessment in the Netherlands. All the reviewed sources agree on one point: research activities should not be assessed based solely on quantitative indicators, especially on the basis of surrogate measures of quality such as impact factor. In the Netherlands, all the key stakeholders in the research sphere adhere to responsible research evaluation. An important role is played by the concept of valorization, which involves the use of scientific research results in the economy and for the benefit of society as a whole. The experience of the Netherlands can be used in Russia to build an advanced system for assessing research activities, which will contribute to achieving the development goals of our country and the implementation of priorities in the scientific, technical, and socio-economic spheres.","PeriodicalId":32161,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomika Nauki","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomika Nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132x-2023-9-3-76-88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
After the departure of commercial scientific information databases such as Scopus and Web of Science from Russia, the problem of building a new system for research assessment is more relevant than ever. At the same time, the new system does not have to copy the previous one with other data sources. The purpose of the article is to analyze global trends in the field of research evaluation. The authors have examined key supranational documents and practices in introducing a responsible approach to research assessment in the Netherlands. All the reviewed sources agree on one point: research activities should not be assessed based solely on quantitative indicators, especially on the basis of surrogate measures of quality such as impact factor. In the Netherlands, all the key stakeholders in the research sphere adhere to responsible research evaluation. An important role is played by the concept of valorization, which involves the use of scientific research results in the economy and for the benefit of society as a whole. The experience of the Netherlands can be used in Russia to build an advanced system for assessing research activities, which will contribute to achieving the development goals of our country and the implementation of priorities in the scientific, technical, and socio-economic spheres.
在Scopus和Web of Science等商业科学信息数据库离开俄罗斯之后,建立一个新的研究评估系统的问题比以往任何时候都更加重要。同时,新系统不需要用其他数据源复制旧系统。本文的目的是分析研究评价领域的全球趋势。作者审查了在荷兰引入负责任的研究评估方法的关键超国家文件和实践。所有审查过的资料来源都同意一点:不应仅根据数量指标评价研究活动,特别是不应根据影响因子等质量替代措施评价研究活动。在荷兰,研究领域的所有关键利益相关者都坚持负责任的研究评估。价值增值的概念发挥了重要作用,它涉及将科学研究成果用于经济和整个社会的利益。俄罗斯可以利用荷兰的经验来建立一个评估研究活动的先进系统,这将有助于实现我国的发展目标和执行科学、技术和社会经济领域的优先事项。