Constitutional Morality Vis-À-Vis Cultural Relativism in India

Anuja Shivraj Rane, Deepashri Sidharaj Choudhari
{"title":"Constitutional Morality Vis-À-Vis Cultural Relativism in India","authors":"Anuja Shivraj Rane, Deepashri Sidharaj Choudhari","doi":"10.55908/sdgs.v11i10.1279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of the instant paper is to examine and potentially support the claim that fundamental rights guaranteed by the Indian Constitution, such as freedom of religion, despite reservations from cultural relativists, can be seen as emerging elements of constitutional morality. This examination will be based on a comprehensive analysis of judicial decisions, scholarly publications, and juristic opinions. Methodology of the Study: The study will analyse relevant judicial decisions, including landmark cases related to fundamental rights, especially freedom of religion, to understand how the Indian judiciary has interpreted and applied these rights. This will involve examining how the courts have balanced cultural relativism concerns with the principles of constitutional morality. Conclusion: The paper emphasizes the importance of universal human rights and argues against dismissing them due to their Western origin. It advocates for the acceptance of human rights across all cultures. The text acknowledges the complex interaction between law and religious culture, with an emphasis on individual morality. It highlights the value of human dignity within the Indian Constitution, aiming to balance individual rights with the state's duty to ensure equality. The paper also prioritizes women's rights and opposes customs that infringe upon them. It mentions Article 25 of the Indian Constitution, which secures freedom of religion with some limitations. In summary, the passage supports universal human rights, addresses the challenges at the intersection of law and religious culture, and stresses the importance of individual rights and dignity within constitutional morality. Result: The findings of this paper will aim to provide a nuanced understanding of the relationship between fundamental rights, cultural relativism, and constitutional morality in the Indian context. It will shed light on whether fundamental rights, especially freedom of religion, can be considered as emerging elements of constitutional morality despite reservations from cultural relativists. The study will present an analysis of judicial dicta, scholarly publications, and juristic opinions to support its conclusions and contribute to the ongoing discourse on these complex and significant issues within Indian constitutional law.","PeriodicalId":41277,"journal":{"name":"McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i10.1279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the instant paper is to examine and potentially support the claim that fundamental rights guaranteed by the Indian Constitution, such as freedom of religion, despite reservations from cultural relativists, can be seen as emerging elements of constitutional morality. This examination will be based on a comprehensive analysis of judicial decisions, scholarly publications, and juristic opinions. Methodology of the Study: The study will analyse relevant judicial decisions, including landmark cases related to fundamental rights, especially freedom of religion, to understand how the Indian judiciary has interpreted and applied these rights. This will involve examining how the courts have balanced cultural relativism concerns with the principles of constitutional morality. Conclusion: The paper emphasizes the importance of universal human rights and argues against dismissing them due to their Western origin. It advocates for the acceptance of human rights across all cultures. The text acknowledges the complex interaction between law and religious culture, with an emphasis on individual morality. It highlights the value of human dignity within the Indian Constitution, aiming to balance individual rights with the state's duty to ensure equality. The paper also prioritizes women's rights and opposes customs that infringe upon them. It mentions Article 25 of the Indian Constitution, which secures freedom of religion with some limitations. In summary, the passage supports universal human rights, addresses the challenges at the intersection of law and religious culture, and stresses the importance of individual rights and dignity within constitutional morality. Result: The findings of this paper will aim to provide a nuanced understanding of the relationship between fundamental rights, cultural relativism, and constitutional morality in the Indian context. It will shed light on whether fundamental rights, especially freedom of religion, can be considered as emerging elements of constitutional morality despite reservations from cultural relativists. The study will present an analysis of judicial dicta, scholarly publications, and juristic opinions to support its conclusions and contribute to the ongoing discourse on these complex and significant issues within Indian constitutional law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宪法道德观-À-Vis印度的文化相对主义
目的:即时论文的目的是检查并潜在地支持这样一种主张,即印度宪法保障的基本权利,如宗教自由,尽管文化相对主义者有所保留,可被视为宪法道德的新兴要素。该考试将基于对司法判决、学术出版物和法律意见的综合分析。研究方法:该研究将分析相关的司法判决,包括与基本权利有关的具有里程碑意义的案件,特别是宗教自由,以了解印度司法机构如何解释和应用这些权利。这将涉及审查法院如何平衡文化相对主义与宪法道德原则之间的关系。结束语:本文强调普遍人权的重要性,反对因为人权的西方起源而忽视它。它倡导在所有文化中接受人权。文本承认法律和宗教文化之间复杂的相互作用,强调个人道德。它强调了印度宪法中人类尊严的价值,旨在平衡个人权利与国家确保平等的义务。该文件还优先考虑妇女的权利,反对侵犯妇女权利的习俗。它提到了印度宪法第25条,该条保障宗教自由,但有一些限制。总之,这段话支持普遍人权,解决了法律与宗教文化交叉的挑战,并强调了宪法道德中个人权利和尊严的重要性。结果:本文的研究结果旨在对印度背景下的基本权利、文化相对主义和宪法道德之间的关系提供细致入微的理解。它将阐明,尽管文化相对论者持保留态度,但基本权利,尤其是宗教自由,是否可以被视为宪法道德的新兴要素。本研究将对司法裁断、学术出版物和法律意见进行分析,以支持其结论,并为印度宪法中这些复杂而重要的问题的持续讨论做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Community Participation Forms in Indonesian Villages to Support the Sustainable Development Goals Program Challenges, Practice and Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Sustainable Development of Environment and Society Gobernanza de Movilidad Humana. Un Aporte a las Políticas Públicas con Enfoque de Desarrollo Sostenible Local Synergity in the Implementation of Government Agencies Performance Accountability System El Marketing Político en las Elecciones Municipales: Una Mirada Desde Los Andes Del Perú: Abancay - Apurímac 2018
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1