{"title":"Constitutional Morality Vis-À-Vis Cultural Relativism in India","authors":"Anuja Shivraj Rane, Deepashri Sidharaj Choudhari","doi":"10.55908/sdgs.v11i10.1279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of the instant paper is to examine and potentially support the claim that fundamental rights guaranteed by the Indian Constitution, such as freedom of religion, despite reservations from cultural relativists, can be seen as emerging elements of constitutional morality. This examination will be based on a comprehensive analysis of judicial decisions, scholarly publications, and juristic opinions. Methodology of the Study: The study will analyse relevant judicial decisions, including landmark cases related to fundamental rights, especially freedom of religion, to understand how the Indian judiciary has interpreted and applied these rights. This will involve examining how the courts have balanced cultural relativism concerns with the principles of constitutional morality. Conclusion: The paper emphasizes the importance of universal human rights and argues against dismissing them due to their Western origin. It advocates for the acceptance of human rights across all cultures. The text acknowledges the complex interaction between law and religious culture, with an emphasis on individual morality. It highlights the value of human dignity within the Indian Constitution, aiming to balance individual rights with the state's duty to ensure equality. The paper also prioritizes women's rights and opposes customs that infringe upon them. It mentions Article 25 of the Indian Constitution, which secures freedom of religion with some limitations. In summary, the passage supports universal human rights, addresses the challenges at the intersection of law and religious culture, and stresses the importance of individual rights and dignity within constitutional morality. Result: The findings of this paper will aim to provide a nuanced understanding of the relationship between fundamental rights, cultural relativism, and constitutional morality in the Indian context. It will shed light on whether fundamental rights, especially freedom of religion, can be considered as emerging elements of constitutional morality despite reservations from cultural relativists. The study will present an analysis of judicial dicta, scholarly publications, and juristic opinions to support its conclusions and contribute to the ongoing discourse on these complex and significant issues within Indian constitutional law.","PeriodicalId":41277,"journal":{"name":"McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i10.1279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The objective of the instant paper is to examine and potentially support the claim that fundamental rights guaranteed by the Indian Constitution, such as freedom of religion, despite reservations from cultural relativists, can be seen as emerging elements of constitutional morality. This examination will be based on a comprehensive analysis of judicial decisions, scholarly publications, and juristic opinions. Methodology of the Study: The study will analyse relevant judicial decisions, including landmark cases related to fundamental rights, especially freedom of religion, to understand how the Indian judiciary has interpreted and applied these rights. This will involve examining how the courts have balanced cultural relativism concerns with the principles of constitutional morality. Conclusion: The paper emphasizes the importance of universal human rights and argues against dismissing them due to their Western origin. It advocates for the acceptance of human rights across all cultures. The text acknowledges the complex interaction between law and religious culture, with an emphasis on individual morality. It highlights the value of human dignity within the Indian Constitution, aiming to balance individual rights with the state's duty to ensure equality. The paper also prioritizes women's rights and opposes customs that infringe upon them. It mentions Article 25 of the Indian Constitution, which secures freedom of religion with some limitations. In summary, the passage supports universal human rights, addresses the challenges at the intersection of law and religious culture, and stresses the importance of individual rights and dignity within constitutional morality. Result: The findings of this paper will aim to provide a nuanced understanding of the relationship between fundamental rights, cultural relativism, and constitutional morality in the Indian context. It will shed light on whether fundamental rights, especially freedom of religion, can be considered as emerging elements of constitutional morality despite reservations from cultural relativists. The study will present an analysis of judicial dicta, scholarly publications, and juristic opinions to support its conclusions and contribute to the ongoing discourse on these complex and significant issues within Indian constitutional law.