Effect of Geometry and Number of Seismic Stations on Micro-Earthquake (MEQ) Hypocenters in Geothermal Fields

Widya Utama, Sherly Ardhya Garini, Merry C. Hutapea, Dhea Pratama Novian Putra, Dwa Desa Warnana, Wien Lestari
{"title":"Effect of Geometry and Number of Seismic Stations on Micro-Earthquake (MEQ) Hypocenters in Geothermal Fields","authors":"Widya Utama, Sherly Ardhya Garini, Merry C. Hutapea, Dhea Pratama Novian Putra, Dwa Desa Warnana, Wien Lestari","doi":"10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.3742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Micro-earthquake (MEQ) distribution describes subsurface conditions that can contribute to monitoring the dynamics of geothermal reservoirs. Thus, the distribution of MEQ hypocenter locations with high accuracy becomes extremely important. Experiments were conducted with 3 variations of geometry and number of seismic stations, while Geiger and Coupled Velocity-Hypocenter methods were used to determine the location of MEQ. Experimental results show that in determining the location of the MEQ, the geometry and number of seismic stations played an important role. Increasing the number of stations with relatively long distances can result in less accurate locations of MEQ, error and bias in determining the location of MEQ will be greater when the azimuth gap value is greater. This is shown by the distribution of MEQ that are more spread out in variations 4A and 4B (4 seismic stations) compared to the distribution of MEQ hypocenters using data from 8 seismic stations. The azimuth gap variations of stations 4A and 4B are 283° and 267°, and 8 stations have a value of 222°. The large value of the azimuth gap is due to the distribution of stations only on one side so that there are horizontal angles that are not covered by seismic stations.","PeriodicalId":490812,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i10.3742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Micro-earthquake (MEQ) distribution describes subsurface conditions that can contribute to monitoring the dynamics of geothermal reservoirs. Thus, the distribution of MEQ hypocenter locations with high accuracy becomes extremely important. Experiments were conducted with 3 variations of geometry and number of seismic stations, while Geiger and Coupled Velocity-Hypocenter methods were used to determine the location of MEQ. Experimental results show that in determining the location of the MEQ, the geometry and number of seismic stations played an important role. Increasing the number of stations with relatively long distances can result in less accurate locations of MEQ, error and bias in determining the location of MEQ will be greater when the azimuth gap value is greater. This is shown by the distribution of MEQ that are more spread out in variations 4A and 4B (4 seismic stations) compared to the distribution of MEQ hypocenters using data from 8 seismic stations. The azimuth gap variations of stations 4A and 4B are 283° and 267°, and 8 stations have a value of 222°. The large value of the azimuth gap is due to the distribution of stations only on one side so that there are horizontal angles that are not covered by seismic stations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地震台站几何形状和台站数量对地热田微震震源的影响
微地震(MEQ)分布描述了地下条件,有助于监测地热储层的动态。因此,高精度的MEQ震源位置分布就显得尤为重要。实验采用3种几何形状和地震台站数量的变化,采用盖革法和速度-震源耦合法确定MEQ的位置。实验结果表明,在确定MEQ的位置时,地震台站的几何形状和台站数量起着重要的作用。距离较远的台站数量增加会导致MEQ定位精度降低,方位角间隙值越大,MEQ定位的误差和偏差越大。与使用8个地震台站数据的MEQ震源分布相比,4A和4B变化区(4个地震台站)的MEQ分布更为分散。4A和4B台站的方位角变化分别为283°和267°,8个台站的方位角变化值为222°。方位角差的大值是由于台站只分布在一侧,因此存在水平角度,而这些角度没有被地震台站覆盖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of Scientific Approach-Based Learning Assisted by Question Cards and Ladder Snake Media for Evaluating Learning Outcomes Way of Biology Teachers to Train HOTS to the Students in Online Learning Process Literature Review of Online Learning Technology in Chemistry Lab Activities Effect of Geometry and Number of Seismic Stations on Micro-Earthquake (MEQ) Hypocenters in Geothermal Fields Effect of Organophosphate Insecticides in Cattle Farming Feed on FSH and LH Hormone Levels in Dairy Cows in Kediri and Pujon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1