Reading Material-Based Content Analysis in Senior High School English Textbooks in Indonesia

Cicih Nuraeni, Didi Sukyadi, Fazri Nur Yusuf
{"title":"Reading Material-Based Content Analysis in Senior High School English Textbooks in Indonesia","authors":"Cicih Nuraeni, Didi Sukyadi, Fazri Nur Yusuf","doi":"10.31002/metathesis.v7i1.480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"English textbooks play a vital role in providing students with language learning input in class activities. Unfortunately, the selection and evaluation of English textbooks has often received insufficient attention and thought. Content such as reading material receives less attention than layout analysis, design, and cultural understanding. The purpose of this study is to investigate the extent to which reading material cover the genres and skills presented in senior high school English textbooks in Indonesia. The qualitative-based content analysis method was used in this study. There were three English textbooks observed, namely those for grades 10, 11, and 12 published by Ministry of Education and Culture in Indonesia. The aspects observed in reading materials include reading genres and skills based on Brown's theory. The study discovered textbooks are dominated by personal reading with 17 reading material and 14 academic materials. Meanwhile, job-related reading is limited to class 10 textbooks. When it comes to reading skills, macroskills take precedence over microskills. Furthermore, based on these findings it can be concluded that the textbooks need to be developed to provide a balanced portion of reading genres and skills in each chapter. The limitations and suggestions are further discussed.","PeriodicalId":34019,"journal":{"name":"Metathesis Journal of English Language Literature and Teaching","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metathesis Journal of English Language Literature and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v7i1.480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

English textbooks play a vital role in providing students with language learning input in class activities. Unfortunately, the selection and evaluation of English textbooks has often received insufficient attention and thought. Content such as reading material receives less attention than layout analysis, design, and cultural understanding. The purpose of this study is to investigate the extent to which reading material cover the genres and skills presented in senior high school English textbooks in Indonesia. The qualitative-based content analysis method was used in this study. There were three English textbooks observed, namely those for grades 10, 11, and 12 published by Ministry of Education and Culture in Indonesia. The aspects observed in reading materials include reading genres and skills based on Brown's theory. The study discovered textbooks are dominated by personal reading with 17 reading material and 14 academic materials. Meanwhile, job-related reading is limited to class 10 textbooks. When it comes to reading skills, macroskills take precedence over microskills. Furthermore, based on these findings it can be concluded that the textbooks need to be developed to provide a balanced portion of reading genres and skills in each chapter. The limitations and suggestions are further discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于阅读材料的印尼高中英语教材内容分析
英语教材在课堂活动中为学生提供语言学习输入起着至关重要的作用。遗憾的是,英语教材的选择和评价往往没有得到足够的重视和思考。阅读材料等内容受到的关注不如布局分析、设计和文化理解。本研究的目的是调查印尼高中英语教科书中阅读材料涵盖体裁和技巧的程度。本研究采用定性含量分析方法。考察了印尼教育和文化部出版的10年级、11年级和12年级英语教材三本。根据布朗的理论,在阅读材料中观察到的方面包括阅读类型和阅读技巧。研究发现,教科书以个人阅读为主,有17种阅读材料和14种学术材料。与此同时,与工作相关的阅读仅限于10级教材。当涉及到阅读技能时,宏观技能优先于微观技能。此外,基于这些发现,我们可以得出结论,教科书需要在每章中提供平衡的阅读类型和技巧。进一步讨论了其局限性和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Teachers’ Competence Among the Student Teachers: An Analysis of Self-Reflective Feedback in Microteaching Class Students’ Difficulties in Speaking English as a Foreign Language: Undergraduate Students’ Voices Reading Material-Based Content Analysis in Senior High School English Textbooks in Indonesia The Effect of Using Classcraft on EFL Students’ Reading Comprehension Students' Perceptions of Kahoot as an Online Quiz Tool in Intensive English Class
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1