Looking at the posterior: accuracy and uncertainty of neural-network predictions

IF 6.3 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Machine Learning Science and Technology Pub Date : 2023-11-08 DOI:10.1088/2632-2153/ad0ab4
Hampus Linander, Oleksandr Balabanov, Henry Yang, Bernhard Mehlig
{"title":"Looking at the posterior: accuracy and uncertainty of neural-network predictions","authors":"Hampus Linander, Oleksandr Balabanov, Henry Yang, Bernhard Mehlig","doi":"10.1088/2632-2153/ad0ab4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Bayesian inference can quantify uncertainty in the predictions of neural networks using posterior distributions for model parameters and network output. By looking at these posterior distributions, one can separate the origin of uncertainty into aleatoric and epistemic contributions. One goal of uncertainty quantification is to inform on prediction accuracy.
Here we show that prediction accuracy depends on both epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty in an intricate fashion that cannot be understood in terms of marginalized uncertainty distributions alone. How the accuracy relates to epistemic and aleatoric uncertainties depends not only on the model architecture, but also on the properties of the dataset.
We discuss the significance of these results for active learning and introduce a novel acquisition function that outperforms common uncertainty-based methods. 
To arrive at our results, we approximated the posteriors using deep ensembles, for fully-connected, convolutional and attention-based neural networks.","PeriodicalId":33757,"journal":{"name":"Machine Learning Science and Technology","volume":" 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Machine Learning Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ad0ab4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Bayesian inference can quantify uncertainty in the predictions of neural networks using posterior distributions for model parameters and network output. By looking at these posterior distributions, one can separate the origin of uncertainty into aleatoric and epistemic contributions. One goal of uncertainty quantification is to inform on prediction accuracy.
Here we show that prediction accuracy depends on both epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty in an intricate fashion that cannot be understood in terms of marginalized uncertainty distributions alone. How the accuracy relates to epistemic and aleatoric uncertainties depends not only on the model architecture, but also on the properties of the dataset.
We discuss the significance of these results for active learning and introduce a novel acquisition function that outperforms common uncertainty-based methods. 
To arrive at our results, we approximated the posteriors using deep ensembles, for fully-connected, convolutional and attention-based neural networks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后验分析:神经网络预测的准确性和不确定性
摘要贝叶斯推理可以利用模型参数和网络输出的后验分布来量化神经网络预测中的不确定性。通过观察这些后验分布,人们可以将不确定性的起源分为任意贡献和认知贡献。不确定性量化的一个目标是告知预测准确性。在这里,我们表明预测准确性以一种复杂的方式依赖于认知不确定性和任意不确定性,这种不确定性不能仅根据边缘不确定性分布来理解。准确性与认知不确定性和任意不确定性的关系不仅取决于模型架构,还取决于数据集的属性。我们讨论了这些结果对主动学习的意义,并引入了一种优于普通基于不确定性方法的新型获取函数。为了得到我们的结果,我们使用深度集成来近似后置,用于完全连接的、卷积的和基于注意力的神经网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Machine Learning Science and Technology
Machine Learning Science and Technology Computer Science-Artificial Intelligence
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
86
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Machine Learning Science and Technology is a multidisciplinary open access journal that bridges the application of machine learning across the sciences with advances in machine learning methods and theory as motivated by physical insights. Specifically, articles must fall into one of the following categories: advance the state of machine learning-driven applications in the sciences or make conceptual, methodological or theoretical advances in machine learning with applications to, inspiration from, or motivated by scientific problems.
期刊最新文献
Quality assurance for online adaptive radiotherapy: a secondary dose verification model with geometry-encoded U-Net. Optimizing ZX-diagrams with deep reinforcement learning DiffLense: a conditional diffusion model for super-resolution of gravitational lensing data Equivariant tensor network potentials Masked particle modeling on sets: towards self-supervised high energy physics foundation models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1