The Teacher-Centered and the Student-Centered: A Comparison of Two Approaches

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing-A Journal of Digital Humanities Pub Date : 2023-08-12 DOI:10.61424/ijah.v1i1.7
Zanyar Nathir Ghafar
{"title":"The Teacher-Centered and the Student-Centered: A Comparison of Two Approaches","authors":"Zanyar Nathir Ghafar","doi":"10.61424/ijah.v1i1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been much discussion in the field of education concerning the differences between teaching based on the educator and teaching centered on the student. One of the main points of contention is that teaching should be student-centered. The claim that more student-centered instruction and less focus on the teacher is one of the most contentious aspects of the debate. Every tactic has unique advantages and disadvantages that cannot be had with any other approach. \"Teacher-centered instruction\" is a term that describes the educational approach that is sometimes referred to as \"traditional education\" by itself. The stage of learning in which the instructor acts as both the principal figure of authority and the primary source of information for the students enrolled in a particular class. On the other hand, learning focused on the student stimulates students to take an active part in the independent research that they perform by pushing them to concentrate on their requirements. This is because learning centered on the student encourages students to learn about themselves. In this investigation, comparison and contrast of these two approaches have been examined, and an attempt has been made to enumerate the advantages of each potential choice.","PeriodicalId":43506,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing-A Journal of Digital Humanities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing-A Journal of Digital Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61424/ijah.v1i1.7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There has been much discussion in the field of education concerning the differences between teaching based on the educator and teaching centered on the student. One of the main points of contention is that teaching should be student-centered. The claim that more student-centered instruction and less focus on the teacher is one of the most contentious aspects of the debate. Every tactic has unique advantages and disadvantages that cannot be had with any other approach. "Teacher-centered instruction" is a term that describes the educational approach that is sometimes referred to as "traditional education" by itself. The stage of learning in which the instructor acts as both the principal figure of authority and the primary source of information for the students enrolled in a particular class. On the other hand, learning focused on the student stimulates students to take an active part in the independent research that they perform by pushing them to concentrate on their requirements. This is because learning centered on the student encourages students to learn about themselves. In this investigation, comparison and contrast of these two approaches have been examined, and an attempt has been made to enumerate the advantages of each potential choice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以教师为中心与以学生为中心:两种教学方式的比较
关于以教育者为中心的教学与以学生为中心的教学的区别,在教育界一直有很多讨论。争论的主要观点之一是教学应该以学生为中心。更多以学生为中心的教学和更少关注教师的说法是这场辩论中最具争议的方面之一。每一种战术都有独特的优势和劣势,这是其他任何方法都无法比拟的。“以教师为中心的教学”是一个术语,用来描述有时被称为“传统教育”的教育方法。在学习的阶段,教师既是主要的权威人物,又是某一特定班级的学生的主要信息来源。另一方面,以学生为中心的学习通过推动学生专注于自己的要求来激励他们积极参与独立研究。这是因为以学生为中心的学习鼓励学生了解自己。在这项调查中,比较和对比这两种方法已经检查,并试图列举每个潜在选择的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
The Influence of the Native Quota in the Organization of Local and Regional Indigenous Political Movements The Impact of Critical Thinking on Learners to Increase their Self regulate in the Education Process: An Overview Graffiti and new media: Levearaging technology to advance creativity and learning in Nigeria From a Crisis Response to Feminist Talking Circles: Reconsidering Collaborative Feedback Practices in the Digital Humanities The Crisis of Artificial Intelligence: A New Digital Humanities Curriculum for Human-Centred AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1