From a Crisis Response to Feminist Talking Circles: Reconsidering Collaborative Feedback Practices in the Digital Humanities

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing-A Journal of Digital Humanities Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.3366/ijhac.2023.0308
Jacquelyne Thoni Howard, Rachel Tabor
{"title":"From a Crisis Response to Feminist Talking Circles: Reconsidering Collaborative Feedback Practices in the Digital Humanities","authors":"Jacquelyne Thoni Howard, Rachel Tabor","doi":"10.3366/ijhac.2023.0308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital humanities (DH) scholars have examined how feminist methodologies promote inclusive practices to value all stages of the development process. DH scholars can learn from feminist educators, however, about how to extend ‘cultures of care’ in DH learning spaces around feedback processes. Centring these feminist tenets, the Technology and Digital Humanities Lab at Newcomb Institute models strategies for how mentors in DH labs and classrooms can use digital tools to adapt during and beyond crises to intentionally build cultures of care and set up supportive spaces for giving and receiving feedback. During the COVID-19 pandemic interns use Zoom to conduct their weekly meetings. While others had a negative connotation with Zoom meetings, we found that the intentional use of the platform’s sharing features created opportunities to unify our community, permitting more discussion across peers when showing their work. Over time we tailored our Zoom use to create a hybrid feminist solidarity circle to meet DH students’ learning needs. We argue through adapting our use of digital tools like Zoom, primarily introduced as a crisis response, we better entrenched our feminist tenets of equitable collaboration by creating a process that encouraged students to seek feedback more openly and on their terms.","PeriodicalId":43506,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing-A Journal of Digital Humanities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing-A Journal of Digital Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/ijhac.2023.0308","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital humanities (DH) scholars have examined how feminist methodologies promote inclusive practices to value all stages of the development process. DH scholars can learn from feminist educators, however, about how to extend ‘cultures of care’ in DH learning spaces around feedback processes. Centring these feminist tenets, the Technology and Digital Humanities Lab at Newcomb Institute models strategies for how mentors in DH labs and classrooms can use digital tools to adapt during and beyond crises to intentionally build cultures of care and set up supportive spaces for giving and receiving feedback. During the COVID-19 pandemic interns use Zoom to conduct their weekly meetings. While others had a negative connotation with Zoom meetings, we found that the intentional use of the platform’s sharing features created opportunities to unify our community, permitting more discussion across peers when showing their work. Over time we tailored our Zoom use to create a hybrid feminist solidarity circle to meet DH students’ learning needs. We argue through adapting our use of digital tools like Zoom, primarily introduced as a crisis response, we better entrenched our feminist tenets of equitable collaboration by creating a process that encouraged students to seek feedback more openly and on their terms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从危机回应到女权主义讨论圈:重新考虑数字人文学科中的协作反馈实践
数字人文(DH)学者研究了女权主义方法如何促进包容性实践,以重视发展过程的各个阶段。然而,卫生保健学者可以向女权主义教育家学习如何在卫生保健学习空间中围绕反馈过程扩展“关怀文化”。以这些女权主义原则为中心,纽科姆研究所的技术和数字人文实验室为DH实验室和教室的导师如何在危机期间和危机之后使用数字工具进行调整,有意地建立关怀文化,并为给予和接受反馈建立支持性空间。在COVID-19大流行期间,实习生使用Zoom召开每周会议。虽然其他人对Zoom会议有负面的含义,但我们发现故意使用平台的共享功能创造了统一我们社区的机会,在展示他们的作品时允许同龄人之间进行更多的讨论。随着时间的推移,我们调整了Zoom的用途,创建了一个混合女权主义团结圈,以满足DH学生的学习需求。我们认为,通过调整我们对Zoom等数字工具的使用,我们创建了一个鼓励学生更公开地、按自己的条件寻求反馈的过程,从而更好地巩固了平等合作的女权主义原则。Zoom主要是作为危机应对措施引入的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
The Influence of the Native Quota in the Organization of Local and Regional Indigenous Political Movements The Impact of Critical Thinking on Learners to Increase their Self regulate in the Education Process: An Overview Graffiti and new media: Levearaging technology to advance creativity and learning in Nigeria From a Crisis Response to Feminist Talking Circles: Reconsidering Collaborative Feedback Practices in the Digital Humanities The Crisis of Artificial Intelligence: A New Digital Humanities Curriculum for Human-Centred AI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1