{"title":"Proficiency testing schemes in laboratory lessons: a useful and powerful educational tool in bioscience studies","authors":"Juan M. Sanchez","doi":"10.1080/00219266.2023.2271508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTBias assessment (systematic errors) is fundamental in industry and service laboratories, where reliable results must be obtained to give correct answers to specific problems. Therefore, knowledge and practice in quality methodologies is of fundamental importance for students. Unfortunately, laboratory lessons often focus on connecting theory and practice without developing the quality assurance skills that employers consider to be useful. Here, an external quality methodology based on proficiency testing schemes has been developed to introduce students to the methodologies and skills that are required to detect and find the source of biased results in the laboratory. It has been found that a large percentage of results obtained during laboratory lessons are in fact biased. The new methodology obliges students to practise how to detect biased results and, specially, the critical thinking skills that are needed to reveal the sources of bias in the laboratory. In the case study evaluated here, the application of the proposed methodology allowed students to detect the source of their biased result in 95% of the cases. Errors found were mainly due to personnel errors, as a consequence of deficits in basic hands-on skills and calculation errors.KEYWORDS: Quality controlproficiency testingsystematic errorslaboratorycritical thinking Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":54873,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biological Education","volume":"17 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biological Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2023.2271508","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACTBias assessment (systematic errors) is fundamental in industry and service laboratories, where reliable results must be obtained to give correct answers to specific problems. Therefore, knowledge and practice in quality methodologies is of fundamental importance for students. Unfortunately, laboratory lessons often focus on connecting theory and practice without developing the quality assurance skills that employers consider to be useful. Here, an external quality methodology based on proficiency testing schemes has been developed to introduce students to the methodologies and skills that are required to detect and find the source of biased results in the laboratory. It has been found that a large percentage of results obtained during laboratory lessons are in fact biased. The new methodology obliges students to practise how to detect biased results and, specially, the critical thinking skills that are needed to reveal the sources of bias in the laboratory. In the case study evaluated here, the application of the proposed methodology allowed students to detect the source of their biased result in 95% of the cases. Errors found were mainly due to personnel errors, as a consequence of deficits in basic hands-on skills and calculation errors.KEYWORDS: Quality controlproficiency testingsystematic errorslaboratorycritical thinking Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
期刊介绍:
Journal of Biological Education is firmly established as the authoritative voice in the world of biological education.
The journal aims to bridge the gap between research and practice, providing information, ideas and opinion, in addition to critical examinations of advances in biology research and teaching. Through the coverage of policy and curriculum developments, the latest results of research into the teaching, learning and assessment of biology are brought to the fore.
Special emphasis is placed on research relevant to educational practice, guided by educational realities in systems, schools, colleges and universities. Papers that are theoretically informed and methodologically rigorous are welcomed.