A joint numerical study of multi-regime turbulent combustion

Benoît Fiorina , Tan Phong Luu , Samuel Dillon , Renaud Mercier , Ping Wang , Lorenzo Angelilli , Pietro Paolo Ciottoli , Francisco E. Hernández–Pérez , Mauro Valorani , Hong G. Im , James C. Massey , Zhiyi Li , Zhi X. Chen , Nedunchezhian Swaminathan , Sebastian Popp , Sandra Hartl , Hendrik Nicolai , Christian Hasse , Andreas Dreizler , David Butz , Robert S. Barlow
{"title":"A joint numerical study of multi-regime turbulent combustion","authors":"Benoît Fiorina ,&nbsp;Tan Phong Luu ,&nbsp;Samuel Dillon ,&nbsp;Renaud Mercier ,&nbsp;Ping Wang ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Angelilli ,&nbsp;Pietro Paolo Ciottoli ,&nbsp;Francisco E. Hernández–Pérez ,&nbsp;Mauro Valorani ,&nbsp;Hong G. Im ,&nbsp;James C. Massey ,&nbsp;Zhiyi Li ,&nbsp;Zhi X. Chen ,&nbsp;Nedunchezhian Swaminathan ,&nbsp;Sebastian Popp ,&nbsp;Sandra Hartl ,&nbsp;Hendrik Nicolai ,&nbsp;Christian Hasse ,&nbsp;Andreas Dreizler ,&nbsp;David Butz ,&nbsp;Robert S. Barlow","doi":"10.1016/j.jaecs.2023.100221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article presents a joint numerical study on the Multi Regime Burner configuration. The burner design consists of three concentric inlet streams, which can be operated independently with different equivalence ratios, allowing the operation of stratified flames characterized by different combustion regimes, including premixed, non-premixed, and multi-regime flame zones. Simulations were performed on three LES solvers based on different numerical methods. Combustion kinetics were simplified by using tabulated or reduced chemistry methods. Finally, different turbulent combustion modeling strategies were employed, covering geometrical, statistical, and reactor based approaches. Due to this significant scattering of simulation parameters, a conclusion on specific combustion model performance is impossible. However, with ten numerical groups involved in the numerical simulations, a rough statistical analysis is conducted: the average and the standard deviation of the numerical simulation are computed and compared against experiments. This joint numerical study is therefore a partial illustration of the community’s ability to model turbulent combustion. This exercise gives the average performance of current simulations and identifies physical phenomena not well captured today by most modeling strategies. Detailed comparisons between experimental and numerical data along radial profiles taken at different axial positions showed that the temperature field is fairly well captured up to 60 mm from the burner exit. The comparison reveals, however, significant discrepancies regarding CO mass fraction prediction. Three causes may explain this phenomenon. The first reason is the higher sensitivity of carbon monoxide to the simplification of detailed chemistry, especially when multiple combustion regimes are encountered. The second is the bias introduced by artificial thickening, which overestimates the species’ mass production rate. This behavior has been illustrated by manufacturing mean thickened turbulent flame brush from a random displacement of 1-D laminar flame solutions. The last one is the influence of the subgrid-scale flame wrinkling on the filtered chemical flame structure, which may be challenging to model.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100104,"journal":{"name":"Applications in Energy and Combustion Science","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100221"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666352X23001103/pdfft?md5=f7868fdb7a292389b78ee7a733e45436&pid=1-s2.0-S2666352X23001103-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applications in Energy and Combustion Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666352X23001103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents a joint numerical study on the Multi Regime Burner configuration. The burner design consists of three concentric inlet streams, which can be operated independently with different equivalence ratios, allowing the operation of stratified flames characterized by different combustion regimes, including premixed, non-premixed, and multi-regime flame zones. Simulations were performed on three LES solvers based on different numerical methods. Combustion kinetics were simplified by using tabulated or reduced chemistry methods. Finally, different turbulent combustion modeling strategies were employed, covering geometrical, statistical, and reactor based approaches. Due to this significant scattering of simulation parameters, a conclusion on specific combustion model performance is impossible. However, with ten numerical groups involved in the numerical simulations, a rough statistical analysis is conducted: the average and the standard deviation of the numerical simulation are computed and compared against experiments. This joint numerical study is therefore a partial illustration of the community’s ability to model turbulent combustion. This exercise gives the average performance of current simulations and identifies physical phenomena not well captured today by most modeling strategies. Detailed comparisons between experimental and numerical data along radial profiles taken at different axial positions showed that the temperature field is fairly well captured up to 60 mm from the burner exit. The comparison reveals, however, significant discrepancies regarding CO mass fraction prediction. Three causes may explain this phenomenon. The first reason is the higher sensitivity of carbon monoxide to the simplification of detailed chemistry, especially when multiple combustion regimes are encountered. The second is the bias introduced by artificial thickening, which overestimates the species’ mass production rate. This behavior has been illustrated by manufacturing mean thickened turbulent flame brush from a random displacement of 1-D laminar flame solutions. The last one is the influence of the subgrid-scale flame wrinkling on the filtered chemical flame structure, which may be challenging to model.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多工况湍流燃烧联合数值研究
这篇文章介绍了对多级燃烧器配置的联合数值研究。该燃烧器设计由三个同心进气流组成,可按不同的等效比独立运行,允许运行以不同燃烧机制为特征的分层火焰,包括预混、非预混和多机制火焰区。模拟在三种基于不同数值方法的 LES 仿真器上进行。燃烧动力学通过使用制表或还原化学方法进行了简化。最后,采用了不同的湍流燃烧建模策略,包括几何、统计和基于反应器的方法。由于模拟参数非常分散,因此无法就具体的燃烧模型性能得出结论。不过,由于有十个数值小组参与了数值模拟,因此进行了粗略的统计分析:计算了数值模拟的平均值和标准偏差,并与实验进行了比较。因此,这项联合数值研究可以部分说明社会各界建立湍流燃烧模型的能力。这项工作提供了当前模拟的平均性能,并确定了目前大多数建模策略无法很好捕捉的物理现象。对不同轴向位置的径向剖面的实验数据和数值数据进行详细比较后发现,在距离燃烧器出口 60 毫米的范围内,温度场的捕捉相当准确。但是,比较结果显示,在 CO 质量分数预测方面存在显著差异。造成这种现象的原因有三个。第一个原因是一氧化碳对简化详细化学过程的敏感性较高,尤其是在遇到多种燃烧状态时。第二个原因是人工增稠带来的偏差,它高估了该物种的质量产生率。从一维层流火焰溶液的随机位移中制造平均加厚湍流火焰刷就可以说明这种行为。最后一个问题是亚网格尺度火焰皱褶对过滤化学火焰结构的影响,这对建模可能具有挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards detailed combustion characteristics and linear stability analysis of premixed ammonia‒hydrogen‒air mixtures bio-FLASHCHAIN® theory for rapid devolatilization of biomass. 10. Validations for agricultural residues Influence of surface cooling on the deposition behavior of combusting Iron particles Observing simultaneous low temperature heat release and deflagration in a spark ignition engine using formaldehyde planar laser induced fluorescence Comprehensive reevaluation of acetaldehyde chemistry - part I: Assessment of important kinetic parameters and the underlying uncertainties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1