The Effect of Inflammatory Markers in the Hemogram Parameters of Pregnant Women with Thyroid Disease on Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes

Q4 Medicine Duzce Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-10-04 DOI:10.18678/dtfd.1251833
Funda DEMİREL, Ünal TURKAY
{"title":"The Effect of Inflammatory Markers in the Hemogram Parameters of Pregnant Women with Thyroid Disease on Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes","authors":"Funda DEMİREL, Ünal TURKAY","doi":"10.18678/dtfd.1251833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aimed to determine the differences in hemogram parameters, especially in inflammatory markers and perinatal and neonatal outcomes of pregnant women with thyroid disease, and to examine the effects of these differences on pregnancy outcomes. Material and Methods: The data of 80 pregnant women diagnosed with thyroid disease according to the American Thyroid Association (ATA) criteria at the first admission between 2016 and 2019 and 100 pregnant women whose thyroid hormone levels were within the normal reference range were retrospectively analyzed. Obstetric outcomes such as type and time of delivery, and the presence of additional disease during pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes such as weight, gender, and Apgar score at birth were compared. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), white blood cell (WBC) count, and hemoglobin (Hb) and mean platelet volume (MPV) values, which are accepted as inflammation markers, were also compared between groups. Results: There was no significant difference between hypothyroid and hyperthyroid pregnant women in terms of Hb (p=0.319) and PLR (p=0.341) values. Third-trimester WBC (p=0.015) values were higher and MPV (p=0.007) values were lower in the hypothyroid pregnant women compared to the control group. The highest NLR (p=0.005) value was observed in the hypothyroid group. Comorbidities were found to be 27.4% (n=20) in the hypothyroid group, 14.3% (n=1) in the hyperthyroid group, and 1.0% (n=1) in the control group (p<0.001). Conclusion: Pregnant women with thyroid disease may have differences in hemogram parameters, especially in inflammatory markers, and these differences may affect pregnancy outcomes.","PeriodicalId":53622,"journal":{"name":"Duzce Medical Journal","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Duzce Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18678/dtfd.1251833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to determine the differences in hemogram parameters, especially in inflammatory markers and perinatal and neonatal outcomes of pregnant women with thyroid disease, and to examine the effects of these differences on pregnancy outcomes. Material and Methods: The data of 80 pregnant women diagnosed with thyroid disease according to the American Thyroid Association (ATA) criteria at the first admission between 2016 and 2019 and 100 pregnant women whose thyroid hormone levels were within the normal reference range were retrospectively analyzed. Obstetric outcomes such as type and time of delivery, and the presence of additional disease during pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes such as weight, gender, and Apgar score at birth were compared. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), white blood cell (WBC) count, and hemoglobin (Hb) and mean platelet volume (MPV) values, which are accepted as inflammation markers, were also compared between groups. Results: There was no significant difference between hypothyroid and hyperthyroid pregnant women in terms of Hb (p=0.319) and PLR (p=0.341) values. Third-trimester WBC (p=0.015) values were higher and MPV (p=0.007) values were lower in the hypothyroid pregnant women compared to the control group. The highest NLR (p=0.005) value was observed in the hypothyroid group. Comorbidities were found to be 27.4% (n=20) in the hypothyroid group, 14.3% (n=1) in the hyperthyroid group, and 1.0% (n=1) in the control group (p<0.001). Conclusion: Pregnant women with thyroid disease may have differences in hemogram parameters, especially in inflammatory markers, and these differences may affect pregnancy outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲状腺疾病孕妇血象参数中炎症标志物对产科和新生儿结局的影响
目的:本研究旨在确定甲状腺疾病孕妇血象参数的差异,特别是炎症标志物和围产期及新生儿结局,并探讨这些差异对妊娠结局的影响。材料与方法:回顾性分析2016 - 2019年首次入院按美国甲状腺协会(ATA)标准诊断为甲状腺疾病的80例孕妇和甲状腺激素水平在正常参考范围内的100例孕妇的资料。比较了分娩类型和时间、妊娠期间是否存在其他疾病等产科结局,以及出生时体重、性别和Apgar评分等新生儿结局。比较两组间中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)、白细胞(WBC)计数、血红蛋白(Hb)和平均血小板体积(MPV)等炎症指标。结果:甲状腺功能低下与甲状腺功能亢进孕妇Hb (p=0.319)、PLR (p=0.341)值差异无统计学意义。甲状腺功能减退孕妇妊娠晚期WBC值(p=0.015)高于对照组,MPV值(p=0.007)低于对照组。甲状腺功能减退组NLR最高(p=0.005)。甲状腺功能减退组合并症发生率为27.4% (n=20),甲状腺功能亢进组为14.3% (n=1),对照组为1.0% (n=1) (p = amp;lt;0.001)。结论:甲状腺疾病孕妇在血象参数,尤其是炎症标志物方面可能存在差异,这些差异可能影响妊娠结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Duzce Medical Journal
Duzce Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Karotis Stenozu Tedavisinde Karotis Arter Stentleme ve Karotis Endarterektomi Yöntemlerinin Kısa Dönem Sonuçları: Randomize Kontrollü Çalışmaların Güncel Bir Meta-Analizi The Effect of Treatment on Weight Gain in Iron Deficiency Anemia and Its Association with Ghrelin and Hepcidin Levels The Effect of Inflammatory Markers in the Hemogram Parameters of Pregnant Women with Thyroid Disease on Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes A Rare Manifestation of Leptospirosis: Long-Term Elevation in Liver Enzymes Muscarinic Receptors as Targets for Metronomic Therapy in Ovarian Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1