{"title":"Joint Collaboration of the Local Government (Regency, City, and Province) for the Successful Development in East Java Of Indonesia","authors":"Muhammad Rozikin, Ahmad Sofwani","doi":"10.55908/sdgs.v11i11.1354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aims to analyze and describe the Joint collaboration between Local Governments (Regency, City, and Province) in the context of regional development in East Java Indonesia, and evaluate the extent to which the effectiveness of this collaboration is compared to the goals and objectives that have been set. Theoretical framework: Development is defined as an effort or series of planned growth and change efforts carried out consciously by a nation, state, and government, towards modernity in the context of nation development (Siagian, 2005. Conceptual problems of regional development have been answered through a Collaborative Governance approach which involves the participation of stakeholder interests, which have recently been developed by experts who are members of the new paradigm of public government (Osborne, 2010). According to the view of Ansell & Gash (2008), Collaborative Governance is \"a governance arrangement in which one or more public institutions collectively directly involve non-state stakeholders in formal collective decision-making processes. Phillips et al. (2000), suggest defining collaboration broadly to cover a wide range of activities and relationships. Following Bardach (1998) who builds on Braun et al. (1996), collaboration is defined as a joint activity, by two or more organizations, that is intended to create public value by working together rather than separately. Method: This type of research is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. This approach was chosen to present data in a systematic, factual, and accurate manner regarding the facts in the field. The qualitative approach itself emphasizes the human element as a research instrument. By emphasizing the human element as a research instrument, it will make it easier to adapt research to the realities that occur in the field. Sugiyono in Pasolong (2020) says that qualitative methods are research methods used to examine natural object conditions, as opposed to experiments, where researchers are key instruments, data collection techniques are carried out in triangulation (combined), data analysis is inductive and the results of qualitative research emphasize meaning rather than generalization. The research location taken was in East Java Province and the research site was the Office of the Regional Planning and Development Agency in East Java Province. Results and Conclusions: The results of the study show that the Regional Development of East Java Province is basically to improve people's welfare based on social justice and is carried out sustainably. Development in an integrated and sustainable manner is oriented toward improving people's welfare. But until now, disparity and poverty are still problems in regional development. Sustainable inclusive infrastructure and economy are a priority for local government policies to reduce regional and socio-economic disparities by increasing inter-regional connectivity. Implications of the research: This study presents policy implications that can be used by local, provincial, and national governments to encourage successful collaboration between regions. The consequences of this strategy could help develop stronger methods for enhancing regional cooperation. Originality/value: This research presents an analysis of the paradigm shift from traditional bureaucracy to post-bureaucracy and how this change affects inter-regional cooperation. The study of bureaucratic paradigm changes in the context of inter-regional cooperation is a new contribution because it can provide a deeper understanding of the evolution of government governance in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":41277,"journal":{"name":"McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy","volume":"10 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"McGill International Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i11.1354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to analyze and describe the Joint collaboration between Local Governments (Regency, City, and Province) in the context of regional development in East Java Indonesia, and evaluate the extent to which the effectiveness of this collaboration is compared to the goals and objectives that have been set. Theoretical framework: Development is defined as an effort or series of planned growth and change efforts carried out consciously by a nation, state, and government, towards modernity in the context of nation development (Siagian, 2005. Conceptual problems of regional development have been answered through a Collaborative Governance approach which involves the participation of stakeholder interests, which have recently been developed by experts who are members of the new paradigm of public government (Osborne, 2010). According to the view of Ansell & Gash (2008), Collaborative Governance is "a governance arrangement in which one or more public institutions collectively directly involve non-state stakeholders in formal collective decision-making processes. Phillips et al. (2000), suggest defining collaboration broadly to cover a wide range of activities and relationships. Following Bardach (1998) who builds on Braun et al. (1996), collaboration is defined as a joint activity, by two or more organizations, that is intended to create public value by working together rather than separately. Method: This type of research is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. This approach was chosen to present data in a systematic, factual, and accurate manner regarding the facts in the field. The qualitative approach itself emphasizes the human element as a research instrument. By emphasizing the human element as a research instrument, it will make it easier to adapt research to the realities that occur in the field. Sugiyono in Pasolong (2020) says that qualitative methods are research methods used to examine natural object conditions, as opposed to experiments, where researchers are key instruments, data collection techniques are carried out in triangulation (combined), data analysis is inductive and the results of qualitative research emphasize meaning rather than generalization. The research location taken was in East Java Province and the research site was the Office of the Regional Planning and Development Agency in East Java Province. Results and Conclusions: The results of the study show that the Regional Development of East Java Province is basically to improve people's welfare based on social justice and is carried out sustainably. Development in an integrated and sustainable manner is oriented toward improving people's welfare. But until now, disparity and poverty are still problems in regional development. Sustainable inclusive infrastructure and economy are a priority for local government policies to reduce regional and socio-economic disparities by increasing inter-regional connectivity. Implications of the research: This study presents policy implications that can be used by local, provincial, and national governments to encourage successful collaboration between regions. The consequences of this strategy could help develop stronger methods for enhancing regional cooperation. Originality/value: This research presents an analysis of the paradigm shift from traditional bureaucracy to post-bureaucracy and how this change affects inter-regional cooperation. The study of bureaucratic paradigm changes in the context of inter-regional cooperation is a new contribution because it can provide a deeper understanding of the evolution of government governance in Indonesia.
目的:本研究旨在分析和描述印度尼西亚东爪哇地区发展背景下地方政府(县、市和省)之间的联合合作,并评估这种合作的有效性与既定目标的比较程度。理论框架:发展被定义为在国家发展的背景下,由民族、国家和政府有意识地为实现现代化而进行的一系列有计划的增长和变革努力(Siagian, 2005)。区域发展的概念问题已经通过涉及利益相关者利益参与的协作治理方法得到了回答,这是最近由公共政府新范式成员的专家开发的(Osborne, 2010)。根据安塞尔的观点;Gash(2008)认为,协同治理是“一个或多个公共机构集体直接让非国家利益相关者参与正式集体决策过程的治理安排”。Phillips等人(2000)建议广泛地定义协作,以涵盖广泛的活动和关系。Bardach(1998)以Braun et al.(1996)为基础,将协作定义为两个或多个组织的联合活动,旨在通过合作而不是单独工作来创造公共价值。方法:这种类型的研究是定性方法的描述性研究。选择这种方法是为了以系统、事实和准确的方式呈现有关该领域事实的数据。定性方法本身强调人的因素作为一种研究工具。通过强调人的因素是一种研究工具,它将使研究更容易适应该领域发生的现实情况。Sugiyono在Pasolong(2020)中表示,定性方法是用于检查自然对象条件的研究方法,而不是实验,研究人员是关键工具,数据收集技术在三角测量(组合)中进行,数据分析是归纳的,定性研究的结果强调意义而不是泛化。研究地点在东爪哇省,研究地点是东爪哇省区域规划和开发署办公室。结果与结论:研究结果表明,东爪哇省区域发展基本上是以社会公正为基础,以提高人民福利为目标,并具有可持续性。全面可持续发展的宗旨是增进人民福祉。但到目前为止,差距和贫困仍然是区域发展中的问题。可持续的包容性基础设施和经济是地方政府政策的优先事项,通过加强区域间的连通性来减少区域和社会经济差距。研究启示:本研究提出了地方、省和国家政府可用于鼓励地区间成功合作的政策启示。这一战略的结果可能有助于制定加强区域合作的更强有力的方法。原创性/价值:本研究分析了从传统科层制到后科层制的范式转变,以及这种转变对区域间合作的影响。对区域间合作背景下官僚主义范式变化的研究是一项新的贡献,因为它可以更深入地了解印度尼西亚政府治理的演变。