How Does the Jumping Performance Differs between Acrobatic and Rhythmic Gymnasts?

Isaura Leite, Márcio Goethel, Filipe Conceição, Lurdes Ávila-Carvalho
{"title":"How Does the Jumping Performance Differs between Acrobatic and Rhythmic Gymnasts?","authors":"Isaura Leite, Márcio Goethel, Filipe Conceição, Lurdes Ávila-Carvalho","doi":"10.3390/biomechanics3040037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An increased jumping performance is key for gymnastics competition routines. Rhythmic gymnasts (RGs) use the jump as one of the main body elements. In Acrobatic Gymnastics (ACRO), top gymnasts must coordinate their jumps with the impulse provided by base gymnast(s). It is expected that the gymnasts’ discipline and role played impact their jumping skill. This work aims to investigate how the jumping performance differs between ACRO gymnasts and RGs, focusing on the Force–Velocity (F-V) profile mechanical variables. Gymnasts were divided in three groups: ACRO tops (n = 10, 13.89 (3.62) median (interquartile interval) years old), ACRO bases (n = 18, 18.24 (4.41) years old) and RGs (n = 15, 12.00 (3.00) years old). The F-V profile during countermovement jump and its mechanical variables were evaluated using MyJump2. A training background survey and anthropometric assessments were conducted. The significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05. Group comparisons showed that ACRO bases jump higher than ACRO tops and RGs, present a higher maximal force than RGs and a more balanced F-V profile, while RGs present high force deficits. Coaches can use this data to develop interventions that optimize the training stimulus to different gymnastics disciplines considering the individual characteristics and adaptability of each gymnast.","PeriodicalId":72381,"journal":{"name":"Biomechanics (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomechanics (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomechanics3040037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An increased jumping performance is key for gymnastics competition routines. Rhythmic gymnasts (RGs) use the jump as one of the main body elements. In Acrobatic Gymnastics (ACRO), top gymnasts must coordinate their jumps with the impulse provided by base gymnast(s). It is expected that the gymnasts’ discipline and role played impact their jumping skill. This work aims to investigate how the jumping performance differs between ACRO gymnasts and RGs, focusing on the Force–Velocity (F-V) profile mechanical variables. Gymnasts were divided in three groups: ACRO tops (n = 10, 13.89 (3.62) median (interquartile interval) years old), ACRO bases (n = 18, 18.24 (4.41) years old) and RGs (n = 15, 12.00 (3.00) years old). The F-V profile during countermovement jump and its mechanical variables were evaluated using MyJump2. A training background survey and anthropometric assessments were conducted. The significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05. Group comparisons showed that ACRO bases jump higher than ACRO tops and RGs, present a higher maximal force than RGs and a more balanced F-V profile, while RGs present high force deficits. Coaches can use this data to develop interventions that optimize the training stimulus to different gymnastics disciplines considering the individual characteristics and adaptability of each gymnast.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
杂技和艺术体操运动员的跳跃表演有何不同?
提高跳高水平是体操比赛常规动作的关键。艺术体操运动员(RGs)使用跳跃作为主要的身体元素之一。在杂技体操(ACRO)项目中,顶尖运动员必须配合基础运动员提供的冲力。预计体操运动员的纪律和角色会影响他们的跳跃技术。这项工作旨在研究ACRO体操运动员和RGs之间的跳跃表现差异,重点关注力-速度(F-V)剖面力学变量。将体操运动员分为3组:ACRO最高组(n = 10、13.89(3.62)岁)、ACRO最低组(n = 18、18.24(4.41)岁)和rg组(n = 15、12.00(3.00)岁)。利用MyJump2对反动作跳跃过程中的F-V曲线及其力学变量进行了评估。进行了培训背景调查和人体测量评估。显著性水平设为p≤0.05。组间比较结果显示,ACRO基部跳高高于ACRO顶部和rg,最大力高于rg, F-V剖面更平衡,而rg则存在较大的力亏。教练员可以利用这些数据,根据每个体操运动员的个体特点和适应性,制定针对不同体操学科的训练刺激优化的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of Aging on Patellofemoral Joint Stress during Stair Negotiation on Challenging Surfaces. Definition of a Global Coordinate System in the Foot for the Surgical Planning of Forefoot Corrections Postural Control Behavior in a Virtual Moving Room Paradigm Patient-Specific 3D Virtual Surgical Planning Using Simulated Fluoroscopic Images to Improve Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Optimization of a Cost-Constrained, Hydraulic Knee Prosthesis Using a Kinematic Analysis Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1