METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING THE INCLUSIVENESS OF AGRARIAN BUSINESS STRUCTURES

Serhii Stepanenko
{"title":"METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING THE INCLUSIVENESS OF AGRARIAN BUSINESS STRUCTURES","authors":"Serhii Stepanenko","doi":"10.32782/2304-0920/3-97-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Achieving the sustainable development goals is closely linked to increasing the inclusiveness of agriculture and rural areas. The urgent need to implement global and national plans to improve the well-being of people requires transformational change in terms of sustainability, inclusiveness and an appropriate assessment of the progress achieved. The article is devoted to the study and systematisation of methodological principles for assessing the level of inclusiveness of social development, particularly in agriculture. The variety of existing methods currently needs to provide a complete scientific and methodological basis for determining the multifaceted processes of sustainability and inclusiveness. The actual set of indicators for assessing the level of inclusiveness at different levels of management of inclusive transformations was examined on the basis of the results of a scientific search. The UN, World Bank, IMF and OECD methodologies were the most widely used. The analysis of Ukraine's economy's inclusiveness level, based on the inclusive development index in the global ranking, revealed a negative trend towards declining inclusive processes. This article outlines the link between sustainable development goals and the objective of achieving agro-inclusion in domestic practice. Sustainable development goals 1, 5, 8, 10, and 13 display the highest correlation with agro-inclusion. It has been suggested that a system of key indicators be established and analysed across three tiers of economic management. The results of the study were used to organise a comprehensive set of indicators aimed at assessing the extent of inclusive change within society. Agricultural and rural area inclusive growth were given particular focus. A set of criteria and indicators for assessing the achieved level of agro-inclusion for the micro-level of management (the status of a separate agricultural unit) was proposed as the main result of the study. The system of criteria and indicators for the assessment of the micro-level of inclusiveness of development was presented in the complementarity of economic, social, political and ecological components of agro-inclusion.","PeriodicalId":485344,"journal":{"name":"Vìsnik Odesʹkogo nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu","volume":"138 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vìsnik Odesʹkogo nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32782/2304-0920/3-97-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Achieving the sustainable development goals is closely linked to increasing the inclusiveness of agriculture and rural areas. The urgent need to implement global and national plans to improve the well-being of people requires transformational change in terms of sustainability, inclusiveness and an appropriate assessment of the progress achieved. The article is devoted to the study and systematisation of methodological principles for assessing the level of inclusiveness of social development, particularly in agriculture. The variety of existing methods currently needs to provide a complete scientific and methodological basis for determining the multifaceted processes of sustainability and inclusiveness. The actual set of indicators for assessing the level of inclusiveness at different levels of management of inclusive transformations was examined on the basis of the results of a scientific search. The UN, World Bank, IMF and OECD methodologies were the most widely used. The analysis of Ukraine's economy's inclusiveness level, based on the inclusive development index in the global ranking, revealed a negative trend towards declining inclusive processes. This article outlines the link between sustainable development goals and the objective of achieving agro-inclusion in domestic practice. Sustainable development goals 1, 5, 8, 10, and 13 display the highest correlation with agro-inclusion. It has been suggested that a system of key indicators be established and analysed across three tiers of economic management. The results of the study were used to organise a comprehensive set of indicators aimed at assessing the extent of inclusive change within society. Agricultural and rural area inclusive growth were given particular focus. A set of criteria and indicators for assessing the achieved level of agro-inclusion for the micro-level of management (the status of a separate agricultural unit) was proposed as the main result of the study. The system of criteria and indicators for the assessment of the micro-level of inclusiveness of development was presented in the complementarity of economic, social, political and ecological components of agro-inclusion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估农业企业结构包容性的方法框架
实现可持续发展目标与提高农业和农村地区的包容性密切相关。迫切需要执行改善人民福祉的全球和国家计划,需要在可持续性、包容性和对所取得进展的适当评估方面进行转型变革。本文致力于研究和系统化评估社会发展,特别是农业发展的包容性水平的方法学原则。现有的各种方法目前需要为确定可持续性和包容性的多方面进程提供一个完整的科学和方法基础。根据一项科学研究的结果,对评估包容性转型管理不同层面的包容性水平的实际指标集进行了审查。联合国、世界银行、国际货币基金组织和经合组织的方法是使用最广泛的。根据全球排名中的包容性发展指数对乌克兰经济的包容性水平进行分析,显示出包容性进程下降的负面趋势。本文概述了可持续发展目标与在国内实践中实现农业包容性目标之间的联系。可持续发展目标1、5、8、10和13与农业包容性相关度最高。有人建议在三个经济管理层面建立和分析一套关键指标系统。这项研究的结果被用来编制一套全面的指标,旨在评估社会包容性变化的程度。农业和农村地区的包容性增长受到特别关注。作为研究的主要成果,提出了一套评估微观管理层面(独立农业单位的地位)实现的农业包容性水平的标准和指标。在农业包容性的经济、社会、政治和生态组成部分的互补性方面,提出了微观层面发展包容性的评估标准和指标体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING THE INCLUSIVENESS OF AGRARIAN BUSINESS STRUCTURES FORMATION OF INSTITUTIONS FOR DECENTRALISATION OF ECONOMIC POWER GLOBAL EXPERIENCE IN FINANCIAL MONITORING OF CRYPTOCURRENCY TRANSACTIONS (ON THE EXAMPLE OF JAPAN, THE US AND THE EU) ORGANISATIONAL, SOCIAL AND INFORMATIONAL SUBSYSTEM IN ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF LAND MANAGEMENT IN AMALGAMATED HROMADAS CRISIS AS A CATALYST FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A BUSINESS ORGANISATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1