Framing and decoupling in global markets: a theoretical framework for the analysis of multiple markets

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI:10.1080/10253866.2023.2261378
Glaucia Peres da Silva
{"title":"Framing and decoupling in global markets: a theoretical framework for the analysis of multiple markets","authors":"Glaucia Peres da Silva","doi":"10.1080/10253866.2023.2261378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTGlobal markets are making the issue of multiple markets especially evident. In light of this, the present paper proposes a theoretical framework for the study of multiple markets based on combining Michel Callon’s concept of framing with Harrison White’s concept of decoupling. Following a review of the literature on global markets in economic sociology and social studies of markets, the proposed theoretical framework is discussed in detail. The focus is on the processes of creating complex calculative frames, which help reduce uncertainties in the operational environment as well as sociocultural contexts. Through these processes, it is possible to analyse how actors form alliances and maintain global markets. The case of the global market for World Music is presented to illustrate the advantages of this theoretical framework.KEYWORDS: Global marketsmultiple marketscalculative framesdecoupling AcknowledgementsI would like to thank the editors and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable and insightful comments on an earlier draft, and Carla Hammes-Welch for editing the paper. All opinions, omissions, and errors remain my own.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 It is important to stress that the calculation of the trade-off between contingency, ambage, and ambiguity is an analytical approach to understand the process of boundary-making in markets. It does not imply that the actors are consciously trading off between these factors in their actions to define, extinguish, and redefine market boundaries.Additional informationNotes on contributorsGlaucia Peres da SilvaGlaucia Peres da Silva is sociologist, specialized in globalization and cross-border processes. Her PhD in economic sociology focused on the formation of global markets, analyzing the case of the world music market. At the University of Tübingen, she is responsible for the development of the Global Awareness Education with focus on the Humanities and Social Sciences. The focus of her work is the inter- and transdisciplinary teaching on globalization, international networking and development of transfer projects.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2023.2261378","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTGlobal markets are making the issue of multiple markets especially evident. In light of this, the present paper proposes a theoretical framework for the study of multiple markets based on combining Michel Callon’s concept of framing with Harrison White’s concept of decoupling. Following a review of the literature on global markets in economic sociology and social studies of markets, the proposed theoretical framework is discussed in detail. The focus is on the processes of creating complex calculative frames, which help reduce uncertainties in the operational environment as well as sociocultural contexts. Through these processes, it is possible to analyse how actors form alliances and maintain global markets. The case of the global market for World Music is presented to illustrate the advantages of this theoretical framework.KEYWORDS: Global marketsmultiple marketscalculative framesdecoupling AcknowledgementsI would like to thank the editors and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable and insightful comments on an earlier draft, and Carla Hammes-Welch for editing the paper. All opinions, omissions, and errors remain my own.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 It is important to stress that the calculation of the trade-off between contingency, ambage, and ambiguity is an analytical approach to understand the process of boundary-making in markets. It does not imply that the actors are consciously trading off between these factors in their actions to define, extinguish, and redefine market boundaries.Additional informationNotes on contributorsGlaucia Peres da SilvaGlaucia Peres da Silva is sociologist, specialized in globalization and cross-border processes. Her PhD in economic sociology focused on the formation of global markets, analyzing the case of the world music market. At the University of Tübingen, she is responsible for the development of the Global Awareness Education with focus on the Humanities and Social Sciences. The focus of her work is the inter- and transdisciplinary teaching on globalization, international networking and development of transfer projects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球市场的框架与脱钩:一个分析多重市场的理论框架
摘要全球化市场使得多元市场的问题显得尤为明显。鉴于此,本文在将米歇尔·卡伦的框架概念与哈里森·怀特的脱钩概念相结合的基础上,提出了多元市场研究的理论框架。在回顾了经济社会学和市场社会研究中关于全球市场的文献之后,本文详细讨论了所提出的理论框架。重点是创建复杂计算框架的过程,这有助于减少操作环境和社会文化背景中的不确定性。通过这些过程,有可能分析参与者如何形成联盟并维持全球市场。世界音乐的全球市场的情况下,提出了说明这一理论框架的优势。关键词:全球市场,多重市场,计算框架,解耦感谢编辑和匿名审稿人对初稿提出的宝贵而深刻的意见,感谢Carla Hammes-Welch对本文的编辑。所有的意见、遗漏和错误都是我自己的。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1必须强调的是,计算偶然性、模糊性和模糊性之间的权衡是理解市场边界形成过程的一种分析方法。这并不意味着参与者在他们的行为中有意识地在这些因素之间进行权衡,以定义、消除和重新定义市场边界。作者简介格劳西亚·佩雷斯·达席尔瓦是一位社会学家,专门研究全球化和跨境进程。她的经济社会学博士学位主要研究全球市场的形成,分析了世界音乐市场的案例。在宾根大学,她负责全球意识教育的发展,重点是人文和社会科学。她的工作重点是全球化,国际网络和转移项目发展的跨学科教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1