Effective Feature Prediction Models for Student Performance

IF 1.5 0 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Pub Date : 2023-10-13 DOI:10.48084/etasr.6345
Bashayer Alsubhi, Basma Alharbi, Nahla Aljojo, Ameen Banjar, Araek Tashkandi, Abdullah Alghoson, Anas Al-Tirawi
{"title":"Effective Feature Prediction Models for Student Performance","authors":"Bashayer Alsubhi, Basma Alharbi, Nahla Aljojo, Ameen Banjar, Araek Tashkandi, Abdullah Alghoson, Anas Al-Tirawi","doi":"10.48084/etasr.6345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ability to accurately predict how students will perform has a significant impact on the teaching and learning process, as it can inform the instructor to devote extra attention to a particular student or group of students, which in turn prevents those students from failing a certain course. When it comes to educational data mining, the accuracy and explainability of predictions are of equal importance. Accuracy refers to the degree to which the predicted value was accurate, and explainability refers to the degree to which the predicted value could be understood. This study used machine learning to predict the features that best contribute to the performance of a student, using a dataset collected from a public university in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Experimental analysis was carried out with Black-Box (BB) and White-Box (WB) machine-learning classification models. In BB classification models, a decision (or class) is often predicted with limited explainability on why this decision was made, while in WB classification models decisions made are fully interpretable to the stakeholders. The results showed that these BB models performed similarly in terms of accuracy and recall whether the classifiers attempted to predict an A or an F grade. When comparing the classifiers' accuracy in making predictions on B grade, the Support Vector Machine (SVM) was found to be superior to Naïve Bayes (NB). However, the recall results were quite similar except for the K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) classifier. When predicting grades C and D, RF had the best accuracy and NB the worst. RF had the best recall when predicting a C grade, while NB had the lowest. When predicting a D grade, SVM had the best recall performance, while NB had the lowest.","PeriodicalId":11826,"journal":{"name":"Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.6345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ability to accurately predict how students will perform has a significant impact on the teaching and learning process, as it can inform the instructor to devote extra attention to a particular student or group of students, which in turn prevents those students from failing a certain course. When it comes to educational data mining, the accuracy and explainability of predictions are of equal importance. Accuracy refers to the degree to which the predicted value was accurate, and explainability refers to the degree to which the predicted value could be understood. This study used machine learning to predict the features that best contribute to the performance of a student, using a dataset collected from a public university in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Experimental analysis was carried out with Black-Box (BB) and White-Box (WB) machine-learning classification models. In BB classification models, a decision (or class) is often predicted with limited explainability on why this decision was made, while in WB classification models decisions made are fully interpretable to the stakeholders. The results showed that these BB models performed similarly in terms of accuracy and recall whether the classifiers attempted to predict an A or an F grade. When comparing the classifiers' accuracy in making predictions on B grade, the Support Vector Machine (SVM) was found to be superior to Naïve Bayes (NB). However, the recall results were quite similar except for the K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) classifier. When predicting grades C and D, RF had the best accuracy and NB the worst. RF had the best recall when predicting a C grade, while NB had the lowest. When predicting a D grade, SVM had the best recall performance, while NB had the lowest.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生成绩的有效特征预测模型
准确预测学生表现的能力对教学过程有重大影响,因为它可以告知教师对特定学生或学生群体给予额外的关注,从而防止这些学生在某门课程中不及格。当涉及到教育数据挖掘时,预测的准确性和可解释性同样重要。准确性是指预测值准确的程度,可解释性是指预测值能够被理解的程度。这项研究使用机器学习来预测最有助于学生表现的特征,使用的数据集来自沙特阿拉伯吉达的一所公立大学。采用黑盒(BB)和白盒(WB)机器学习分类模型进行实验分析。在BB分类模型中,对决策(或类)的预测通常具有有限的可解释性,而在WB分类模型中,所做的决策对利益相关者是完全可解释的。结果表明,无论分类器试图预测A还是F,这些BB模型在准确性和召回率方面表现相似。在比较分类器对B级的预测准确率时,发现支持向量机(SVM)优于Naïve贝叶斯(NB)。然而,召回结果非常相似,除了k -最近邻(KNN)分类器。在预测C级和D级时,RF的准确度最好,NB的准确度最差。在预测C级时,RF的记忆力最好,而NB的记忆力最低。在预测D级时,SVM的召回率最好,NB的召回率最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research
Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
46.70%
发文量
222
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Malware Attack Detection in Large Scale Networks using the Ensemble Deep Restricted Boltzmann Machine Enhancement of Power System Security by the Intelligent Control of a Static Synchronous Series Compensator Mix Design of Fly Ash and GGBS based Geopolymer Concrete activated with Water Glass A New Approach on the Egyptian Black Sand Ilmenite Alteration Processes Boric Acid as a Safe Insecticide for Controlling the Mediterranean Fruit Fly Ceratitis Capitata Wiedemann (Diptera: Tephritidae)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1