The comparison of students’ long jump study programs

Andrii Yefremenko, Svitlana Рiatysotska, Viktor Pavlenko
{"title":"The comparison of students’ long jump study programs","authors":"Andrii Yefremenko, Svitlana Рiatysotska, Viktor Pavlenko","doi":"10.15391/snsv.2023-3.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Study Aim: The modern educational process in physical education needs to form educational competencies for a limited time. It is necessary to use modern approaches. Purpose – to determine the effectiveness of holistic and differentiated methods of study the technique of long jumps by combat sports students. Material and methods: Objects. 20 healthy first-year students of bachelor of different sports qualification, who are engaged in single combats (n = 20). Following the results of the stating experiment, the participants were divided into two groups: group A (n = 10) – students with a satisfactory level of physical fitness; group B (n = 10) – students with a high level of physical fitness. Methods: testing of physical fitness using specific field tests for long jumpers for to determine the physical fitness of combat sports students and their ranking by test groups (30 m running (s); standing long jump (cm) 5-fold jump on the take-off leg (cm); triple standing jump (cm); long Jump (cm)); record video and video analysis of the elements technique of the long jump (long jump (cm); speed of the last 5 m of running start (m/s); speed of the last 10 m running start (m/s); take-off time (m/s); tempo of the last six steps (step/s)) – in order to determine the technique of the long jump from a run; the statistics made it possible to determine the effectiveness of programs of study the technique of the long jump by comparing the indicators of the initial and repeated video analysis of the records. Approach. The impact of two study programs on long jumps with a running start of students was investigated. They learn to become coaches and are engaged in types of single combats. Programs are developed considering two approaches: 1) holistic execution of different jumps (holistic approach); 2) performing special exercises and long jump parts (differentiated approach). To form study programs, the main exercises for studying long jump techniques were chosen. Results: At the beginning of the study, the indicators of physical fitness were stated. The objects were ranked into two different groups A (satisfactory level of physical fitness) and B (high level of physical fitness) (p<0.05): 30 m running – [4,53 s (Group A); 4,39 s (Group B)]; standing long jump – [235,63 cm (Group A); 273,38 cm (Group B)]; 5-fold jump on the take-off leg – [1223.50 cm (Group A); 1270.88 cm (Group B)]; triple standing jump – [635,88 cm (Group A); 667,38 cm (Group B)]; long jump – [451,75 cm (Group A); 472,63 cm (Group B)]. After used approach, it was found that as a result of study the long jump technique using different programs, the test results significantly improved (p<0.05): long jumps – for the athletes of Group A [451,75 cm; 478,50 cm], for the athletes of Group B [472,63 ; 491,88 cm]; speed of the last 5 m of running start – for the athletes of Group A [6,41; 6,47 m/s], for the athletes of Group B [6,79 ; 6,87 m/s]; speed of the last 10 m running start – for the athletes of Group A [6,42; 6,48 m/s]; take-off time – for athletes of Group A [0,23 ; 0,21 m/s], for the athletes of Group B [0,22; 0,20 m/s]; tempo of the last six steps – for the athletes of Group A [3,01 ; 3,13 steps/s], for the athletes of Group B [3,24 ; 3,41 steps/s]. The positive impact of the developed programs on speed indicators of running start and take-off in both test groups was found. All indicators as a result of intra-group and inter-group comparison significantly differed from the beginning to the end of the research (p<0,05). The exception was indicators of take-offs, which didn’t differ significantly in groups A and B (p>0,05). Conclusion: The effectiveness of the influence of both developed training programs on the long jump technique was discovered. Despite the previous motor experience and nonspecialized sports activity, it is possible to introduce different ways of studying motor actions, which are provided by the educational program. This allows you to maximize the individual opportunities of students. The presented long jump approaches allow using the level of physical fitness of trained individuals as a basis for the formation of educational programs. This allows you to increase the motivation, curiosity, and effectiveness of training a modern specialist in physical education. The development of flexible programs for students to study in other types of track and field is necessary.","PeriodicalId":30613,"journal":{"name":"Slobozhans''kii naukovosportivnii visnik","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Slobozhans''kii naukovosportivnii visnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15391/snsv.2023-3.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Study Aim: The modern educational process in physical education needs to form educational competencies for a limited time. It is necessary to use modern approaches. Purpose – to determine the effectiveness of holistic and differentiated methods of study the technique of long jumps by combat sports students. Material and methods: Objects. 20 healthy first-year students of bachelor of different sports qualification, who are engaged in single combats (n = 20). Following the results of the stating experiment, the participants were divided into two groups: group A (n = 10) – students with a satisfactory level of physical fitness; group B (n = 10) – students with a high level of physical fitness. Methods: testing of physical fitness using specific field tests for long jumpers for to determine the physical fitness of combat sports students and their ranking by test groups (30 m running (s); standing long jump (cm) 5-fold jump on the take-off leg (cm); triple standing jump (cm); long Jump (cm)); record video and video analysis of the elements technique of the long jump (long jump (cm); speed of the last 5 m of running start (m/s); speed of the last 10 m running start (m/s); take-off time (m/s); tempo of the last six steps (step/s)) – in order to determine the technique of the long jump from a run; the statistics made it possible to determine the effectiveness of programs of study the technique of the long jump by comparing the indicators of the initial and repeated video analysis of the records. Approach. The impact of two study programs on long jumps with a running start of students was investigated. They learn to become coaches and are engaged in types of single combats. Programs are developed considering two approaches: 1) holistic execution of different jumps (holistic approach); 2) performing special exercises and long jump parts (differentiated approach). To form study programs, the main exercises for studying long jump techniques were chosen. Results: At the beginning of the study, the indicators of physical fitness were stated. The objects were ranked into two different groups A (satisfactory level of physical fitness) and B (high level of physical fitness) (p<0.05): 30 m running – [4,53 s (Group A); 4,39 s (Group B)]; standing long jump – [235,63 cm (Group A); 273,38 cm (Group B)]; 5-fold jump on the take-off leg – [1223.50 cm (Group A); 1270.88 cm (Group B)]; triple standing jump – [635,88 cm (Group A); 667,38 cm (Group B)]; long jump – [451,75 cm (Group A); 472,63 cm (Group B)]. After used approach, it was found that as a result of study the long jump technique using different programs, the test results significantly improved (p<0.05): long jumps – for the athletes of Group A [451,75 cm; 478,50 cm], for the athletes of Group B [472,63 ; 491,88 cm]; speed of the last 5 m of running start – for the athletes of Group A [6,41; 6,47 m/s], for the athletes of Group B [6,79 ; 6,87 m/s]; speed of the last 10 m running start – for the athletes of Group A [6,42; 6,48 m/s]; take-off time – for athletes of Group A [0,23 ; 0,21 m/s], for the athletes of Group B [0,22; 0,20 m/s]; tempo of the last six steps – for the athletes of Group A [3,01 ; 3,13 steps/s], for the athletes of Group B [3,24 ; 3,41 steps/s]. The positive impact of the developed programs on speed indicators of running start and take-off in both test groups was found. All indicators as a result of intra-group and inter-group comparison significantly differed from the beginning to the end of the research (p<0,05). The exception was indicators of take-offs, which didn’t differ significantly in groups A and B (p>0,05). Conclusion: The effectiveness of the influence of both developed training programs on the long jump technique was discovered. Despite the previous motor experience and nonspecialized sports activity, it is possible to introduce different ways of studying motor actions, which are provided by the educational program. This allows you to maximize the individual opportunities of students. The presented long jump approaches allow using the level of physical fitness of trained individuals as a basis for the formation of educational programs. This allows you to increase the motivation, curiosity, and effectiveness of training a modern specialist in physical education. The development of flexible programs for students to study in other types of track and field is necessary.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生跳远学习方案的比较
背景与研究目的:现代体育教育过程需要在有限的时间内形成教育能力。有必要采用现代方法。目的:探讨综合差别化搏击体育学生跳远技术学习方法的有效性。材料与方法:研究对象:20名健康的不同体育专业本科一年级学生进行单打(n = 20)。根据陈述实验的结果,将参与者分为两组:A组(n = 10) -身体健康水平满意的学生;B组(n = 10)——身体健康水平较高的学生。方法:采用跳远专项体能测试,确定搏击体育专业学生的体能水平,并按测试组(30米跑)进行排名;立定跳远(厘米)起跳腿5次起跳(厘米);三级立定跳远(厘米);跳远(厘米);对跳远(跳远(厘米))的基本技术进行录像和录像分析;跑起最后5米的速度(m/s);最后10米起跑速度(m/s);起飞时间(m/s);最后六步的速度(步/秒)——以确定从跑步开始跳远的技术;通过对记录的初次录像分析和重复录像分析的指标进行比较,统计数据使确定跳远技术学习计划的有效性成为可能。的方法。研究了两种学习方案对学生起跑跳远的影响。他们学习成为教练,并参与各种类型的单打。程序的开发考虑了两种方法:1)不同跳跃的整体执行(整体方法);2)进行特殊练习和跳远部分(差异化方法)。选择学习跳远技术的主要练习,形成学习计划。结果:在研究开始时,对体质指标进行了说明。将实验对象分为两个不同的组:A组(体质良好)和B组(体质良好)(p<0.05): 30米跑- [4,53 s] (A组);4,39 s (B组)];立定跳远[235,63厘米](A组);273,38 cm (B组)];起跳腿5次起跳[1223.50 cm] (A组);1270.88 cm (B组)];三级立定跳远[635,88厘米](A组);667,38 cm (B组)];跳远- 451,75厘米(A组);472、63 cm (B组)]。采用方法后发现,采用不同方案对跳远技术进行研究,测试结果有显著提高(p<0.05): a组运动员跳远[451,75 cm];B组运动员[472,63];491年,88厘米);A组运动员起跑最后5米速度[6,41];6,47 m/s], B组运动员[6,79];6, 87 m / s);A组运动员最后10米起跑速度[6,42];6, 48 m / s);起飞时间- A组运动员[0,23;0,21 m/s], B组运动员[0,22;0, 20米/秒);A组运动员后六步速度[3,01];[3,13步/秒],B组运动员[3,24;3, 41个步骤/ s)。开发的程序对两组的起跑和起飞速度指标都有积极的影响。组内和组间比较的各项指标从研究开始到结束均有显著差异(p< 0.05)。例外的是起飞指标,A组和B组差异不显著(p> 0.05)。结论:发现了两种训练方案对跳远技术影响的有效性。尽管以前的运动经验和非专业的体育活动,有可能引入不同的方法来研究运动动作,这是由教育计划提供的。这可以让你最大限度地提高学生的个人机会。提出的跳远方法允许使用训练个体的身体健康水平作为形成教育计划的基础。这可以让你增加动力,好奇心和训练一个现代体育专家的有效性。为学生在其他类型的田径项目中学习制定灵活的课程是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative analysis of physical development and body composition of kickboxing athletes with different training experience Development of speed-strength abilities of 11-12 year old rugby players using a set of special exercises The comparison of students’ long jump study programs Assessment of the functional state of the cardiovascular system of students during a mountain hiking trip Analysis and generalization of the manifestation of different types of force in competitive exercises of the leaders of the world armwrestling weighing over 100 kg
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1