Metaphor of Nation and Nationalism

Seong-Woo Choi
{"title":"Metaphor of Nation and Nationalism","authors":"Seong-Woo Choi","doi":"10.19116/theory.2023.28.3.167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study extends prior theoretical discussions on metaphor as a rhetorical topos, a discourse statement, and a cognitive tool, with a particular focus on the metaphor of nation due to its enduring relevance in contemporary discourse. It explores the intricate role of metaphor in shaping, perpetuating, and challenging nationalist discourse, recognizing that metaphors possess a dual capacity to both wield power and constrain truths. The metaphors of the nation, contextualized within the CONTAINMENT metaphor framework, play a pivotal role in the construction and reinforcement of nationalist discourse. From a feminist perspective, nationalist discourse and its associated metaphors are deeply rooted in patriarchal ideals, leading to the marginalization of women and the portrayal of the nation as a patriarchal family or brotherhood. When viewed through colonial and postcolonial lenses, these metaphors reveal concepts of hierarchy and equality between nations. For instance, Rabindranath Tagore metaphorically characterizes the nation as a soulless monster, emphasizing the imperative to reject this notion in favor of fostering a more balanced community that harmonizes both body and spirit. In contrast, Thomas Hobbes employs the metaphor of the commonwealth as a Leviathan, firmly establishing a hierarchical structure that underscores the significance of obedience in the relationship between the soul and the body of the commonwealth, with the soul positioned as superior to its constituent elements. Tagore’s perspective aligns with notions of equality, anti-nationalism, and postcolonialism, whereas Hobbes’ hierarchical view could potentially justify the legitimacy of colonialism.","PeriodicalId":488777,"journal":{"name":"Bi'pyeong gwa i'lon","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bi'pyeong gwa i'lon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19116/theory.2023.28.3.167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study extends prior theoretical discussions on metaphor as a rhetorical topos, a discourse statement, and a cognitive tool, with a particular focus on the metaphor of nation due to its enduring relevance in contemporary discourse. It explores the intricate role of metaphor in shaping, perpetuating, and challenging nationalist discourse, recognizing that metaphors possess a dual capacity to both wield power and constrain truths. The metaphors of the nation, contextualized within the CONTAINMENT metaphor framework, play a pivotal role in the construction and reinforcement of nationalist discourse. From a feminist perspective, nationalist discourse and its associated metaphors are deeply rooted in patriarchal ideals, leading to the marginalization of women and the portrayal of the nation as a patriarchal family or brotherhood. When viewed through colonial and postcolonial lenses, these metaphors reveal concepts of hierarchy and equality between nations. For instance, Rabindranath Tagore metaphorically characterizes the nation as a soulless monster, emphasizing the imperative to reject this notion in favor of fostering a more balanced community that harmonizes both body and spirit. In contrast, Thomas Hobbes employs the metaphor of the commonwealth as a Leviathan, firmly establishing a hierarchical structure that underscores the significance of obedience in the relationship between the soul and the body of the commonwealth, with the soul positioned as superior to its constituent elements. Tagore’s perspective aligns with notions of equality, anti-nationalism, and postcolonialism, whereas Hobbes’ hierarchical view could potentially justify the legitimacy of colonialism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民族隐喻与民族主义
本研究扩展了先前关于隐喻作为修辞主题、话语陈述和认知工具的理论讨论,特别关注民族隐喻,因为它在当代话语中具有持久的相关性。它探讨了隐喻在塑造、延续和挑战民族主义话语中的复杂作用,认识到隐喻具有双重能力,既可以行使权力,又可以约束真理。在遏制隐喻框架下语境化的民族隐喻,在民族主义话语的建构和强化中起着举足轻重的作用。从女权主义的角度来看,民族主义话语及其相关隐喻深深植根于父权理想,导致女性被边缘化,并将国家描绘为父权家庭或兄弟情谊。从殖民和后殖民的角度来看,这些隐喻揭示了国家之间的等级和平等概念。例如,泰戈尔(Rabindranath Tagore)将国家比喻成一个没有灵魂的怪物,强调必须拒绝这种观念,以培养一个更平衡的社会,使身体和精神和谐一致。相比之下,托马斯·霍布斯将联邦比喻为利维坦,牢固地建立了一个等级结构,强调了在联邦的灵魂和身体之间的关系中服从的重要性,灵魂被定位为优于其组成元素。泰戈尔的观点与平等、反民族主义和后殖民主义的概念一致,而霍布斯的等级观点则可能为殖民主义的合法性辩护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lacan and Badiou: Philosophy and Antiphilosophy Zora Neale Hurston’s Trans-Corporeal Imagination: A Reading of Their Eyes Were Watching God Rethinking Rancière’s Film Theory: Focusing on the Concepts of Fiction and Image Literature as a Global Theory Wordsworth’s Affective Materialism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1