ON COGNITIVE MODELS OF VIRTUAL SPACE AND REAL SPACE IN MULTICULTURAL FICTION

S.S. GRETSKAYA
{"title":"ON COGNITIVE MODELS OF VIRTUAL SPACE AND REAL SPACE IN MULTICULTURAL FICTION","authors":"S.S. GRETSKAYA","doi":"10.55959/msu-2074-1588-19-26-1-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper focuses on the cognitive modelling of literary text space. The aim of the research was to conduct a comparative study of the cognitive proxemic models of the subconcepts “virtual space” and “real space”, as represented in the multicultural novel «Walking in Two Worlds» by W. Kinew. In accordance with E.A. Ogneva’s research, a cognitive model of literary text space is defined as a construct which demonstrates the correlation between various constituents of the nominative field of the literary concept “space”, which is perceived and comprehended by the reader. The term “proxeme” is used to denote a word or a word combination that is semantically related to parameters of space. The article presents data on the quantitative relation between the types of thematic proxemic models which comprise the nominative field of the literary subconcepts “virtual space” and “real space”, namely, models of personalised anthropocentrically marked literary text space, models of non-personalised anthropocentrically marked literary text space, as well as those of non-personalised anthropocentrically unmarked literary text space. For each of the abovementioned categories of proxemic models the most common types of proxemes are identified. In addition to this, the representation of dynamic literary text space and the spatial axes is examined. The results obtained highlight the qualitative differences between the significance of the virtual literary text space and the real literary text space, as conceived by the author of the novel. Despite the fact that the characters perceive real life as less salient and important than their performance in the virtual space, the real literary text space turns out to be more intense in terms of human activity than the virtual literary text space and, therefore, not less meaningful, whereas the virtual text space is represented as an environment conducive to creativity alongside revival and/or preservation of traditional culture.","PeriodicalId":487101,"journal":{"name":"Moscow University Bulletin Series 19 Linguistics and Intercultural Communication","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Moscow University Bulletin Series 19 Linguistics and Intercultural Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55959/msu-2074-1588-19-26-1-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present paper focuses on the cognitive modelling of literary text space. The aim of the research was to conduct a comparative study of the cognitive proxemic models of the subconcepts “virtual space” and “real space”, as represented in the multicultural novel «Walking in Two Worlds» by W. Kinew. In accordance with E.A. Ogneva’s research, a cognitive model of literary text space is defined as a construct which demonstrates the correlation between various constituents of the nominative field of the literary concept “space”, which is perceived and comprehended by the reader. The term “proxeme” is used to denote a word or a word combination that is semantically related to parameters of space. The article presents data on the quantitative relation between the types of thematic proxemic models which comprise the nominative field of the literary subconcepts “virtual space” and “real space”, namely, models of personalised anthropocentrically marked literary text space, models of non-personalised anthropocentrically marked literary text space, as well as those of non-personalised anthropocentrically unmarked literary text space. For each of the abovementioned categories of proxemic models the most common types of proxemes are identified. In addition to this, the representation of dynamic literary text space and the spatial axes is examined. The results obtained highlight the qualitative differences between the significance of the virtual literary text space and the real literary text space, as conceived by the author of the novel. Despite the fact that the characters perceive real life as less salient and important than their performance in the virtual space, the real literary text space turns out to be more intense in terms of human activity than the virtual literary text space and, therefore, not less meaningful, whereas the virtual text space is represented as an environment conducive to creativity alongside revival and/or preservation of traditional culture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论多元文化小说中虚拟空间与现实空间的认知模式
本文主要研究文学文本空间的认知建模。本研究的目的是对W. Kinew的多元文化小说《行走在两个世界》中所代表的子概念“虚拟空间”和“真实空间”的认知邻近模型进行比较研究。根据E.A. Ogneva的研究,文学文本空间的认知模型被定义为一种结构,它展示了文学概念“空间”的主谓场的各个组成部分之间的相互关系,并被读者感知和理解。“近义词”一词用于表示与空间参数在语义上相关的单词或单词组合。本文提供了构成文学子概念“虚拟空间”和“现实空间”的主谓场的主题邻近模型类型之间的数量关系数据,即个性化的人类中心标记的文学文本空间模型、非个性化的人类中心标记的文学文本空间模型以及非个性化的人类中心无标记的文学文本空间模型。对于上述每一类邻域模型,确定了最常见的邻域类型。除此之外,动态文学文本空间和空间轴的表示进行了检查。所获得的结果突出了小说作者所设想的虚拟文学文本空间与真实文学文本空间意义的质的差异。尽管角色认为现实生活不如他们在虚拟空间中的表现突出和重要,但事实证明,就人类活动而言,真实的文学文本空间比虚拟文学文本空间更加强烈,因此,意义并不亚于虚拟文本空间,而虚拟文本空间则表现为有利于创造力以及复兴和/或保护传统文化的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
REFRACTION OF THE IDEA OF IMAGINARY SPACES AND SUPRA-INDIVIDUAL MYTHS OF P.A. FLORENSKY IN THE WORKS OF THE WRITERS AT THE TURN OF THE 20TH CENTURY METHODOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES AND STRATEGIES OF THE TEXT-BOOK “ENGLISH FOR NATURAL SCIENCES (A2-B1)” IN THE SYSTEM OF PREPARING STUDENTS FOR THE FINAL EXAM IN A FOREIGN LANGUAGE ANALYSIS OF THE USE OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PROCESS OF TEACHING CHINESE TROUGH THE EXAMPLE OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION OF THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA SPATIAL ARCHETYPES IN THE ARTISTIC WORLD OF V.E. SAVKIN AND YU.D. DEEV A CASE FOR EMPHATIC PARTICLES IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1