Analysis of Physiochemical Characteristics of Angelica acutiloba Roots by Different Drying Methods

Dae Hui Jeong, Hong-Woo Park, Young-Ki Kim, Hae-Yun Kwon
{"title":"Analysis of Physiochemical Characteristics of Angelica acutiloba Roots by Different Drying Methods","authors":"Dae Hui Jeong, Hong-Woo Park, Young-Ki Kim, Hae-Yun Kwon","doi":"10.7783/kjmcs.2023.31.5.297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study was conducted to confirm the morphological and compositional changes in Angelica acutiloba (Siebold & Zucc.) Kitagawa roots by different drying methods and to provide basic data for post-harvest management.BRMethods and Results: Two types of root samples, fine roots that were originally removed and samples that were sliced, were prepared. They were dried by four methods (freeze-drying, hot airdrying, shade-drying, and direct solar-drying), and the drying characteristics were investigated. Drying time was the shortest in freeze-drying, and the longest in shade-drying. The hardness of the dried roots was relatively higher in hot air- and direct solar-dried samples, and the color varied according to each drying treatments. The (Z)-ligustilide content was relatively higher in the case of freeze-dried or shade-dried samples than in other samples.BRConclusions: These results provide insights into the optimal post-harvest drying technology for A. acutiloba.","PeriodicalId":22918,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Journal of Medicinal Crop Science","volume":"62 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Journal of Medicinal Crop Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7783/kjmcs.2023.31.5.297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study was conducted to confirm the morphological and compositional changes in Angelica acutiloba (Siebold & Zucc.) Kitagawa roots by different drying methods and to provide basic data for post-harvest management.BRMethods and Results: Two types of root samples, fine roots that were originally removed and samples that were sliced, were prepared. They were dried by four methods (freeze-drying, hot airdrying, shade-drying, and direct solar-drying), and the drying characteristics were investigated. Drying time was the shortest in freeze-drying, and the longest in shade-drying. The hardness of the dried roots was relatively higher in hot air- and direct solar-dried samples, and the color varied according to each drying treatments. The (Z)-ligustilide content was relatively higher in the case of freeze-dried or shade-dried samples than in other samples.BRConclusions: These results provide insights into the optimal post-harvest drying technology for A. acutiloba.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同干燥方法对当归根理化特性的分析
背景:本研究旨在证实当归(Angelica acutiloba, Siebold & Zucc.)的形态和成分变化。通过对北川根不同干燥方法的研究,为采收后的管理提供基础数据。方法与结果:制备了两种类型的根样品,一种是原始切除的细根,另一种是切片的根。采用冷冻干燥、热风干燥、遮荫干燥和日光直接干燥四种干燥方法对其进行干燥,并对其干燥特性进行了研究。干燥时间以冷冻干燥最短,阴凉干燥最长。热风干燥和日光直接干燥的根的硬度相对较高,不同干燥方式的根的颜色也不同。冻干和阴凉干燥样品的(Z)-藁本内酯含量相对高于其他样品。结论:研究结果为金针叶采收后最佳干燥工艺提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study on the Pharmacological Problems and Glycyrrhizin of Licorice Distributed in Korea Analysis of Physiochemical Characteristics of Angelica acutiloba Roots by Different Drying Methods Comparative Analysis of Morphological Characteristics and Effective Components of Domestic Codonopsis Plants Development of Genomic Simple Sequence Repeat Markers and Variety Discrimination in Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge Analysis of Wing Forms and Dominant of Thrips nigropilosus Uzel (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) Inflicting to Cnidium officinale Makino
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1