Assessing the performances and transferability of graph neural network metamodels for water distribution systems

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Journal of Hydroinformatics Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI:10.2166/hydro.2023.031
Bulat Kerimov, Roberto Bentivoglio, Alexander Garzón, Elvin Isufi, Franz Tscheikner-Gratl, David Bernhard Steffelbauer, Riccardo Taormina
{"title":"Assessing the performances and transferability of graph neural network metamodels for water distribution systems","authors":"Bulat Kerimov, Roberto Bentivoglio, Alexander Garzón, Elvin Isufi, Franz Tscheikner-Gratl, David Bernhard Steffelbauer, Riccardo Taormina","doi":"10.2166/hydro.2023.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Metamodels accurately reproduce the output of physics-based hydraulic models with a significant reduction in simulation times. They are widely employed in water distribution system (WDS) analysis since they enable computationally expensive applications in the design, control, and optimisation of water networks. Recent machine-learning-based metamodels grant improved fidelity and speed; however, they are only applicable to the water network they were trained on. To address this issue, we investigate graph neural networks (GNNs) as metamodels for WDSs. GNNs leverage the networked structure of WDS by learning shared coefficients and thus offering the potential of transferability. This work evaluates the suitability of GNNs as metamodels for estimating nodal pressures in steady-state EPANET simulations. We first compare the effectiveness of GNN metamodels against multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs) on several benchmark WDSs. Then, we explore the transferability of GNNs by training them concurrently on multiple WDSs. For each configuration, we calculate model accuracy and speedups with respect to the original numerical model. GNNs perform similarly to MLPs in terms of accuracy and take longer to execute but may still provide substantial speedup. Our preliminary results indicate that GNNs can learn shared representations across networks, although assessing the feasibility of truly general metamodels requires further work.","PeriodicalId":54801,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydroinformatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydroinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2023.031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Metamodels accurately reproduce the output of physics-based hydraulic models with a significant reduction in simulation times. They are widely employed in water distribution system (WDS) analysis since they enable computationally expensive applications in the design, control, and optimisation of water networks. Recent machine-learning-based metamodels grant improved fidelity and speed; however, they are only applicable to the water network they were trained on. To address this issue, we investigate graph neural networks (GNNs) as metamodels for WDSs. GNNs leverage the networked structure of WDS by learning shared coefficients and thus offering the potential of transferability. This work evaluates the suitability of GNNs as metamodels for estimating nodal pressures in steady-state EPANET simulations. We first compare the effectiveness of GNN metamodels against multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs) on several benchmark WDSs. Then, we explore the transferability of GNNs by training them concurrently on multiple WDSs. For each configuration, we calculate model accuracy and speedups with respect to the original numerical model. GNNs perform similarly to MLPs in terms of accuracy and take longer to execute but may still provide substantial speedup. Our preliminary results indicate that GNNs can learn shared representations across networks, although assessing the feasibility of truly general metamodels requires further work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
配水系统图神经网络元模型的性能和可移植性评估
元模型精确地再现了基于物理的水力模型的输出,大大减少了仿真时间。它们被广泛应用于供水系统(WDS)分析,因为它们在供水网络的设计、控制和优化中实现了计算昂贵的应用。最近基于机器学习的元模型提高了保真度和速度;然而,他们只适用于他们接受培训的供水网络。为了解决这个问题,我们研究了图神经网络(gnn)作为wds的元模型。gnn通过学习共享系数来利用WDS的网络结构,从而提供可转移性的潜力。这项工作评估了gnn作为估计稳态EPANET模拟中节点压力的元模型的适用性。我们首先在几个基准wds上比较了GNN元模型与多层感知器(mlp)的有效性。然后,我们通过在多个wds上同时训练gnn来探索它们的可转移性。对于每种配置,我们计算模型的精度和速度相对于原来的数值模型。gnn在准确性方面的表现与mlp相似,执行时间更长,但仍然可以提供实质性的加速。我们的初步结果表明,gnn可以跨网络学习共享表示,尽管评估真正通用元模型的可行性需要进一步的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydroinformatics
Journal of Hydroinformatics 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
59
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Hydroinformatics is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to the application of information technology in the widest sense to problems of the aquatic environment. It promotes Hydroinformatics as a cross-disciplinary field of study, combining technological, human-sociological and more general environmental interests, including an ethical perspective.
期刊最新文献
Sensitivity of model-based leakage localisation in water distribution networks to water demand sampling rates and spatio-temporal data gaps Efficient functioning of a sewer system: application of novel hybrid machine learning methods for the prediction of particle Froude number Quantile mapping technique for enhancing satellite-derived precipitation data in hydrological modelling: a case study of the Lam River Basin, Vietnam Development and application of a hybrid artificial neural network model for simulating future stream flows in catchments with limited in situ observed data Formation of meandering streams in a young floodplain within the Yarlung Tsangpo Grand Canyon in the Tibetan Plateau
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1