Evaluation of the effect of kefir supplementation on inflammatory markers and clinical and hematological indices in COVID-19 patients; a randomized double-blined clinical trial

IF 1.7 Q2 Medicine Advances in integrative medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.aimed.2023.10.006
Ramin Gooruee , Naseh Pahlavani , Vahid Hadi , Saeid Hadi
{"title":"Evaluation of the effect of kefir supplementation on inflammatory markers and clinical and hematological indices in COVID-19 patients; a randomized double-blined clinical trial","authors":"Ramin Gooruee ,&nbsp;Naseh Pahlavani ,&nbsp;Vahid Hadi ,&nbsp;Saeid Hadi","doi":"10.1016/j.aimed.2023.10.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p><span>The aim of the present study was to evaluation the impacts of kefir intake, as a popular traditional </span>probiotic product on the immune response and the recovery process of COVID-19 patients admitted to the hospital.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a double-blind randomized controlled trial<span> on 100 COVID-19 patients selected from Emam Reza Hospital between February 9, 2022, and March 9, 2022. In the intervention group, participants received kefir grains (2–10 %) to milk twice a day (250 ccs each time) for two weeks. Clinical outcomes such as fever, pain, gastrointestinal symptoms, and dyspnea were collected at the beginning and end of the study using a checklist prepared by the research team. Also, each group measured inflammatory indices (ESR &amp; CRP) and hematological factors before and after the intervention.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean age of participants was 47.06 ± 8.90 years. WBC before (p = 0.001), neutrophil<span> before (p = 0.001), lymphocyte before (p = 0.000) and after (p = 0.001) the intervention, hemoglobin before (p = 0.001) and after (p = 0.001) the intervention, CRP before (0.001), ESR after (p = 0.011), and oxygen saturation after (p = 0.001) the intervention had statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups (p &lt; 0.05).</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Overall, two weeks of kefir intakes in COVID-19 patients had beneficial effects on ESR, WBC count, and Oxygen saturation levels. However, this probiotic product did not influence other evaluated indices including CRP and Hemoglobin in COVID-19 patients. More studies are required to clarify this topic.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7343,"journal":{"name":"Advances in integrative medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in integrative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212958823000873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The aim of the present study was to evaluation the impacts of kefir intake, as a popular traditional probiotic product on the immune response and the recovery process of COVID-19 patients admitted to the hospital.

Methods

We conducted a double-blind randomized controlled trial on 100 COVID-19 patients selected from Emam Reza Hospital between February 9, 2022, and March 9, 2022. In the intervention group, participants received kefir grains (2–10 %) to milk twice a day (250 ccs each time) for two weeks. Clinical outcomes such as fever, pain, gastrointestinal symptoms, and dyspnea were collected at the beginning and end of the study using a checklist prepared by the research team. Also, each group measured inflammatory indices (ESR & CRP) and hematological factors before and after the intervention.

Results

The mean age of participants was 47.06 ± 8.90 years. WBC before (p = 0.001), neutrophil before (p = 0.001), lymphocyte before (p = 0.000) and after (p = 0.001) the intervention, hemoglobin before (p = 0.001) and after (p = 0.001) the intervention, CRP before (0.001), ESR after (p = 0.011), and oxygen saturation after (p = 0.001) the intervention had statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Overall, two weeks of kefir intakes in COVID-19 patients had beneficial effects on ESR, WBC count, and Oxygen saturation levels. However, this probiotic product did not influence other evaluated indices including CRP and Hemoglobin in COVID-19 patients. More studies are required to clarify this topic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估克菲尔补充剂对 COVID-19 患者炎症指标以及临床和血液学指标的影响;随机双盲临床试验
背景 本研究的目的是评估摄入克菲尔这种流行的传统益生菌产品对入院的 COVID-19 患者的免疫反应和恢复过程的影响。方法 我们在 2022 年 2 月 9 日至 2022 年 3 月 9 日期间对 Emam Reza 医院选取的 100 名 COVID-19 患者进行了双盲随机对照试验。在干预组中,参与者在牛奶中加入克菲尔颗粒(2-10%),每天两次(每次 250 毫升),持续两周。在研究开始和结束时,使用研究小组准备的检查表收集发烧、疼痛、胃肠道症状和呼吸困难等临床结果。此外,各组还在干预前后测量了炎症指数(ESR & CRP)和血液学因子。干预前的白细胞(p = 0.001)、干预前的中性粒细胞(p = 0.001)、干预前的淋巴细胞(p = 0.000)和干预后的淋巴细胞(p = 0.001)、干预前的血红蛋白(p = 0.001)和干预后的血红蛋白(p = 0.001)、干预前的 CRP(0.001)、干预后的血沉(p = 0.011)和干预后的血氧饱和度(p = 0.001)干预组和对照组之间有统计学意义的差异(p <0.05)。结论总的来说,COVID-19 患者摄入两周的开菲尔对血沉、白细胞计数和血氧饱和度水平有好处。然而,这种益生菌产品并不影响 COVID-19 患者的其他评估指标,包括 CRP 和血红蛋白。要弄清这个问题,还需要更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in integrative medicine
Advances in integrative medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Integrative Medicine (AIMED) is an international peer-reviewed, evidence-based research and review journal that is multi-disciplinary within the fields of Integrative and Complementary Medicine. The journal focuses on rigorous quantitative and qualitative research including systematic reviews, clinical trials and surveys, whilst also welcoming medical hypotheses and clinically-relevant articles and case studies disclosing practical learning tools for the consulting practitioner. By promoting research and practice excellence in the field, and cross collaboration between relevant practitioner groups and associations, the journal aims to advance the practice of IM, identify areas for future research, and improve patient health outcomes. International networking is encouraged through clinical innovation, the establishment of best practice and by providing opportunities for cooperation between organisations and communities.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The reasons for the use of traditional and complementary medicine by cancer patients in Morocco A hot-water extract of Sargassum hemiphyllum as the sole treatment for allergic contact dermatitis – A case report The safety and tolerability of Annona muricata leaf product in people living with cancer: Study protocol Effect of DU meridian long snake moxibustion on intestinal flora of people with yang deficiency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1