Can History be Not Political? The Phenomenon of Nina Aleksandrovna Khachaturyan

Susanna Tsaturova
{"title":"Can History be Not Political? The Phenomenon of Nina Aleksandrovna Khachaturyan","authors":"Susanna Tsaturova","doi":"10.18254/s207987840027478-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the process of transformation of the world historiography, including Russian one, in the field of the political history of the Middle Ages. The contribution of the Annales School is emphasized not only because of the appeal to man as an actor of historical processes, but also the methodological overcoming of the binary opposition of matter and spirit. Structuralism with its systematic analysis also played a positive role, as well as the appeal of historians to the study of phenomena of long duration, which began to be perceived as the history of states and, more broadly, the power. All these changes were reflected in the work of Professor N. A. Khachaturian (1931—2020). Thanks to her research on the representative regime of the West in the Middle Ages, on the social nature of the estate monarchy in France, on the forms of dialogue between power and society, as well as due to her creation of the Scientific Group “Power and Society” (holding conferences, publishing collective monographs), political history in Russian medieval studies took the place of the backbone of historical research.","PeriodicalId":51929,"journal":{"name":"Istoriya-Elektronnyi Nauchno-Obrazovatelnyi Zhurnal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Istoriya-Elektronnyi Nauchno-Obrazovatelnyi Zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18254/s207987840027478-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the process of transformation of the world historiography, including Russian one, in the field of the political history of the Middle Ages. The contribution of the Annales School is emphasized not only because of the appeal to man as an actor of historical processes, but also the methodological overcoming of the binary opposition of matter and spirit. Structuralism with its systematic analysis also played a positive role, as well as the appeal of historians to the study of phenomena of long duration, which began to be perceived as the history of states and, more broadly, the power. All these changes were reflected in the work of Professor N. A. Khachaturian (1931—2020). Thanks to her research on the representative regime of the West in the Middle Ages, on the social nature of the estate monarchy in France, on the forms of dialogue between power and society, as well as due to her creation of the Scientific Group “Power and Society” (holding conferences, publishing collective monographs), political history in Russian medieval studies took the place of the backbone of historical research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
历史可以不政治化吗?尼娜·哈查图良现象
本文考察了包括俄国在内的世界史学在中世纪政治史领域的转型过程。年鉴学派的贡献之所以被强调,不仅是因为它呼吁人作为历史进程的参与者,而且还因为它在方法论上克服了物质和精神的二元对立。结构主义及其系统的分析也发挥了积极的作用,历史学家对长期现象的研究也产生了吸引力,这些现象开始被视为国家的历史,更广泛地说,是权力的历史。所有这些变化都反映在N. A.哈恰图良教授(1931-2020)的著作中。由于她对中世纪西方代议制制度、法国地产君主制的社会性质、权力与社会对话形式的研究,以及她创建的“权力与社会”科学小组(召开会议、出版集体专著),俄罗斯中世纪研究中的政治史占据了历史研究的骨干地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
127
期刊最新文献
Constructing Energy: “Wood Supply” in Salt Works in the Russian North in the 17th Century The Republic of Korea and the Republic of Türkiye are “Blood Brothers” “Italia… Longe Ante Tempora Diluvii Habitata Creditur”: The Most Ancient Past of Italy in the Latin Treatise “De Origine Urbium Italie” (from the Late 14th Century) New European Historical Writing: Formation of a Research Paradigm Lex Regia in the Writings of Oldrado da Ponte: Pros and Cons for the Emperor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1