Performing without a script: a dramaturgical analysis of the first cohort of Senior High School teachers in the history of Philippine education

IF 1.9 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Teachers and Teaching Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.1080/13540602.2023.2265829
Manuel R. Enverga, Elizabeth R. Enverga
{"title":"Performing without a script: a dramaturgical analysis of the first cohort of Senior High School teachers in the history of Philippine education","authors":"Manuel R. Enverga, Elizabeth R. Enverga","doi":"10.1080/13540602.2023.2265829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTIn 2013, the Philippines shifted from a ten to a thirteen year basic education curriculum. Expanding the number of years of schooling necessitated the addition of new grade levels, including Grades 11 and 12, collectively referred to as ‘Senior High School’. The teachers who first taught in these levels were in a situation in which they had to carry out their work without a prescribed modus operandi. There was no precedent for how one dealt with students, administrators, or parents. Nevertheless, these teachers had to carry on with their work. Using data gathered from 19 FGD participants, this paper examined the experiences of the pioneer batch of instructors to handle Grade 11 and 12 students. Goffman’s (1956) dramaturgical approach was a useful heuristic for understanding the data. It is underpinned by the assumption that social interactions resemble stage performances, with individuals performing roles for audiences. The pioneering batch of teachers could, thus, be understood as actors having to play the role of competent educator to audiences of students and parents without a fully-written script, in the form of existing modus operandi. The difficulties of their role are compounded by bureaucratic uncertainty among administrators, their backstage support staff.Keywords: Dramaturgysenior high school teachersPhilippinesK-12 transition Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).","PeriodicalId":47914,"journal":{"name":"Teachers and Teaching","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teachers and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2023.2265829","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTIn 2013, the Philippines shifted from a ten to a thirteen year basic education curriculum. Expanding the number of years of schooling necessitated the addition of new grade levels, including Grades 11 and 12, collectively referred to as ‘Senior High School’. The teachers who first taught in these levels were in a situation in which they had to carry out their work without a prescribed modus operandi. There was no precedent for how one dealt with students, administrators, or parents. Nevertheless, these teachers had to carry on with their work. Using data gathered from 19 FGD participants, this paper examined the experiences of the pioneer batch of instructors to handle Grade 11 and 12 students. Goffman’s (1956) dramaturgical approach was a useful heuristic for understanding the data. It is underpinned by the assumption that social interactions resemble stage performances, with individuals performing roles for audiences. The pioneering batch of teachers could, thus, be understood as actors having to play the role of competent educator to audiences of students and parents without a fully-written script, in the form of existing modus operandi. The difficulties of their role are compounded by bureaucratic uncertainty among administrators, their backstage support staff.Keywords: Dramaturgysenior high school teachersPhilippinesK-12 transition Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无剧本表演:菲律宾教育史上第一批高中教师的戏剧分析
2013年,菲律宾将基础教育课程从10年改为13年。扩大受教育年限需要增加新的年级,包括11年级和12年级,统称为“高中”。最初在这些级别教学的教师处于这样一种情况,即他们必须在没有规定的操作方法的情况下开展工作。在如何对待学生、管理人员或家长方面,还没有先例。然而,这些教师必须继续他们的工作。本文利用19位FGD参与者的数据,考察了首批指导教师处理11年级和12年级学生的经验。Goffman(1956)的戏剧方法是理解数据的有用启发式方法。社会互动类似于舞台表演,个人为观众扮演角色,这一假设支持了这一观点。因此,这批先锋教师可以被理解为演员,他们必须在没有完整的剧本的情况下,以现有的手法,在学生和家长的观众面前扮演称职的教育者的角色。管理人员和后台支持人员之间官僚主义的不确定性,加剧了他们扮演角色的困难。关键词:戏剧;高中教师;菲律宾高中-12年级过渡披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Teachers and Teaching
Teachers and Teaching EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
7.40%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice provides an international focal point for the publication of research on teachers and teaching, in particular on teacher thinking. It offers a means of communication and dissemination of completed research and research in progress, whilst also providing a forum for debate between researchers. This unique journal draws together qualitative and quantitative research from different countries and cultures which focus on the social, political and historical contexts of teaching as work. It includes theoretical reflections on the connections between theory and practice in teachers" work and other research of professional interest.
期刊最新文献
A psychosocial reading of teacher agency Empowering emerging teacher leaders: insights from a self-study community of practice Racial microaggressions on the initial teacher education programmes: implications for minority ethnic teacher retention ‘Not elsewhere specified’: a case study of preservice teachers’ perceptions and practices of outdoor learning Looking back to move forward: re-examining “alternative” certification as a site for teacher learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1