Cognitive complexity measures for educational texts: Empirical validation of linguistic parameters

IF 1.5 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Russian Journal of Linguistics Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.22363/2687-0088-35817
Roman V. Kupriyanov, Olga V. Bukach, Oksana I. Aleksandrova
{"title":"Cognitive complexity measures for educational texts: Empirical validation of linguistic parameters","authors":"Roman V. Kupriyanov, Olga V. Bukach, Oksana I. Aleksandrova","doi":"10.22363/2687-0088-35817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents a study conducted within the framework of discourse complexology - an integral scientific domain that has united linguists, cognitive scientists, psychologists and programmers dealing with the problems of discourse complexity. The issue of cognitive complexity of texts is one of the central issues in discourse complexology. The paper presents the results of the study aimed to identify and empirically validate a list of educational texts’ complexity predictors. The study aims to identify discriminant linguistic parameters sufficient to assess cognitive complexity of educational texts. We view text cognitive complexity as a construct, based on the amount of presented information and the success of reader-text interactions. The idea behind the research is that text cognitive complexity notably increases across middle and high schools. The research dataset comprises eight biology textbooks with the total size of 219,319 tokens. Metrics of text linguistic features were estimated with the help of automatic analyzer RuLingva (rulingva.kpfu.ru). Linguistic and statistical analysis confirmed the hypothesis that text syntactic and lexical parameters are discriminative enough to classify different levels of cognitive complexity of educational texts used in middle and high schools. Text parameters that manifest variance in cognitive complexity include lexical diversity (TTR); local argument overlap; abstractness index; number of polysyllabic words, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level; number of nouns and number of adjectives per sentence. Empirical evidence indicates that the proposed approach outperforms existing methods of text complexity assessment. The research results can be implemented in the system of scientific and educational content expertise for Russian school textbooks. They can also be of some use in the development of educational resources and further research in the field of text complexity.","PeriodicalId":53426,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Linguistics","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-35817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents a study conducted within the framework of discourse complexology - an integral scientific domain that has united linguists, cognitive scientists, psychologists and programmers dealing with the problems of discourse complexity. The issue of cognitive complexity of texts is one of the central issues in discourse complexology. The paper presents the results of the study aimed to identify and empirically validate a list of educational texts’ complexity predictors. The study aims to identify discriminant linguistic parameters sufficient to assess cognitive complexity of educational texts. We view text cognitive complexity as a construct, based on the amount of presented information and the success of reader-text interactions. The idea behind the research is that text cognitive complexity notably increases across middle and high schools. The research dataset comprises eight biology textbooks with the total size of 219,319 tokens. Metrics of text linguistic features were estimated with the help of automatic analyzer RuLingva (rulingva.kpfu.ru). Linguistic and statistical analysis confirmed the hypothesis that text syntactic and lexical parameters are discriminative enough to classify different levels of cognitive complexity of educational texts used in middle and high schools. Text parameters that manifest variance in cognitive complexity include lexical diversity (TTR); local argument overlap; abstractness index; number of polysyllabic words, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level; number of nouns and number of adjectives per sentence. Empirical evidence indicates that the proposed approach outperforms existing methods of text complexity assessment. The research results can be implemented in the system of scientific and educational content expertise for Russian school textbooks. They can also be of some use in the development of educational resources and further research in the field of text complexity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育文本的认知复杂性测量:语言参数的实证验证
语篇复杂性是语言学家、认知科学家、心理学家和程序员共同研究语篇复杂性问题的科学领域。语篇认知复杂性问题是语篇复杂性学的核心问题之一。本文提出了一项研究的结果,旨在确定并实证验证一系列教育文本的复杂性预测因子。本研究旨在找出足以评估教育文本认知复杂性的判别语言参数。我们将文本认知复杂性视为一种结构,基于呈现信息的数量和读者-文本互动的成功。这项研究背后的想法是,在初中和高中,文本认知的复杂性显著增加。研究数据集包括8本生物学教科书,总规模为219319个token。使用自动分析器RuLingva (RuLingva .kpfu.ru)对文本语言特征度量进行估计。语言学和统计学分析证实了这一假设,即文本句法和词汇参数具有足够的辨别力,足以区分初高中教育文本的不同认知复杂性水平。在认知复杂性方面表现出差异的文本参数包括词汇多样性(TTR);局部参数重叠;抽象性指数;多音节单词数,flesch - kinkaid等级水平;每句话中名词和形容词的数量。经验证据表明,本文提出的方法优于现有的文本复杂性评估方法。研究成果可应用于俄罗斯学校教科书的科教内容专业知识体系。对教育资源的开发和文本复杂性领域的进一步研究也有一定的借鉴意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Russian Journal of Linguistics
Russian Journal of Linguistics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
33.30%
发文量
43
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Linguistic pluricentrism and the Russian language Picture naming test: Linguistic challenges of the method and ways to solve them Cognitive complexity measures for educational texts: Empirical validation of linguistic parameters The image of Russia through animal metaphors: A diachronic case study of American media discourse The gentle craft of saying “No” in Persian and English: A cross-cultural and cross-linguistic slant
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1