Organs or bodies? Toward an equitable, embodied, and animal-inclusive diversity, equity, and inclusion agenda

IF 1.9 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS Consumption Markets & Culture Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI:10.1080/10253866.2023.2276419
Jack Waverley
{"title":"Organs or bodies? Toward an equitable, embodied, and animal-inclusive diversity, equity, and inclusion agenda","authors":"Jack Waverley","doi":"10.1080/10253866.2023.2276419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper celebrates the turn toward embodiment. Drawing connections between embodiment and the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) agenda, this article notes that the axis of speciesism, or discrimination based on species membership, has not featured prominently thus far. The turn toward embodiment should not turn away from the billions of animal bodies, but nor should it include animals in less than equitable ways. The construct of speciesism is developed using the Žižekean concept of Organs without Bodies (OwBs) and its predecessor, Deleuze and Guattari’s Bodies without Organs (BwOs). It is argued that the exclusion of animals (unembodiment) is undesirable, but so too is the inclusion of animals as OwBs or BwOs, both of which are more inclusive but inequitable. This article advocates for fuller theorisations of animal embodiment, at similar levels of complexity and care to those given to human embodiments, theories of embodiment recognising animals as (dis)organised bodies.","PeriodicalId":47423,"journal":{"name":"Consumption Markets & Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consumption Markets & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2023.2276419","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper celebrates the turn toward embodiment. Drawing connections between embodiment and the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) agenda, this article notes that the axis of speciesism, or discrimination based on species membership, has not featured prominently thus far. The turn toward embodiment should not turn away from the billions of animal bodies, but nor should it include animals in less than equitable ways. The construct of speciesism is developed using the Žižekean concept of Organs without Bodies (OwBs) and its predecessor, Deleuze and Guattari’s Bodies without Organs (BwOs). It is argued that the exclusion of animals (unembodiment) is undesirable, but so too is the inclusion of animals as OwBs or BwOs, both of which are more inclusive but inequitable. This article advocates for fuller theorisations of animal embodiment, at similar levels of complexity and care to those given to human embodiments, theories of embodiment recognising animals as (dis)organised bodies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
器官还是身体?朝着一个公平的、具体化的、包容动物的多样性、公平和包容的议程迈进
这篇文章庆祝了向具体化的转变。这篇文章将体现与多样性、公平和包容(DEI)议程联系起来,指出物种主义的轴心,或基于物种成员的歧视,到目前为止还没有突出表现。向具体化的转变不应该远离数十亿的动物身体,但也不应该以不公平的方式包括动物。物种主义的概念是在Žižekean无器官(OwBs)概念及其前身德勒兹和瓜塔里的无器官(BwOs)概念的基础上发展起来的。有人认为,将动物排除在外(unembodiment)是不可取的,但将动物纳入owb或bwo也是不可取的,这两种情况都更具包容性,但不公平。这篇文章提倡更完整的动物化身理论,在类似于人类化身的复杂性和关怀水平上,将动物视为(无组织)身体的化身理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Critical discourse analysis of fast fashion companies' legitimation strategies on Instagram Architecting virtual storefronts: how in-game shops are designed to encourage consumption Re-classifying consumer research Legitimizing sustainable game meat consumption: a discursive-visual approach to legitimacy claims Reimagining the inevitable: how metaverse imaginaries construct understandings of privacy and surveillance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1