The specificity of teacher reflectivity in early education teachers – a study report

Joanna Szymczak, Adam Mroczkowski
{"title":"The specificity of teacher reflectivity in early education teachers – a study report","authors":"Joanna Szymczak, Adam Mroczkowski","doi":"10.26881/pwe.2023.56.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents selected results of a preliminary research of teacher reflectivity. The empirical material was collected through the original Early Education Teacher Reflectivity Questionnaire on (pre)School Daily Life. It was answered by early education teachers and graduate students of early childhood pedagogy. The article also describes the understanding of reflectivity adopted here, along with its importance for building awareness of what it means to be a teacher with regard to reflection. Furthermore, careful consideration was given to the presented results followed by reflections on the results of the study. The analysis indicated that teachers in the study group did have a problem with identifying criteria for selecting situations to which they assigned a critical dimension. They seemed to lack insight into themselves. In their analyses, they evaluated individual aspects of a given event, but did not pose questions that might motivate in-depth reflection. Moreover, they equated anticipating the position of other persons about a given incident with experiencing a variety of perspectives. They avoided involving other people in the process of analyzing a situation, thus depriving themselves of an opportunity to develop transformative learning abilities. At their current stage of professional education, they showed a need for support, which may be aided by the assumptions of the humanistic concept of teacher education and the emancipatory rationality.","PeriodicalId":500355,"journal":{"name":"Problemy Wczesnej Edukacji","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problemy Wczesnej Edukacji","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26881/pwe.2023.56.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents selected results of a preliminary research of teacher reflectivity. The empirical material was collected through the original Early Education Teacher Reflectivity Questionnaire on (pre)School Daily Life. It was answered by early education teachers and graduate students of early childhood pedagogy. The article also describes the understanding of reflectivity adopted here, along with its importance for building awareness of what it means to be a teacher with regard to reflection. Furthermore, careful consideration was given to the presented results followed by reflections on the results of the study. The analysis indicated that teachers in the study group did have a problem with identifying criteria for selecting situations to which they assigned a critical dimension. They seemed to lack insight into themselves. In their analyses, they evaluated individual aspects of a given event, but did not pose questions that might motivate in-depth reflection. Moreover, they equated anticipating the position of other persons about a given incident with experiencing a variety of perspectives. They avoided involving other people in the process of analyzing a situation, thus depriving themselves of an opportunity to develop transformative learning abilities. At their current stage of professional education, they showed a need for support, which may be aided by the assumptions of the humanistic concept of teacher education and the emancipatory rationality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师反思性在早教教师中的特殊性——一项研究报告
本文介绍了教师反思性初步研究的部分结果。实证资料是通过原版《早教教师(学前)学校日常生活反思性问卷》收集的。这个问题得到了早教教师和幼儿教育学研究生的回答。文章还描述了这里所采用的反射率的理解,以及它对建立教师对反射率的认识的重要性。此外,对提出的结果进行了仔细考虑,然后对研究结果进行了反思。分析表明,研究小组的教师在确定选择情境的标准方面确实存在问题,他们为这些情境分配了一个关键维度。他们似乎对自己缺乏洞察力。在他们的分析中,他们评估了一个给定事件的各个方面,但没有提出可能引发深入思考的问题。此外,他们将预测他人对某一特定事件的看法等同于体验不同的视角。他们避免让其他人参与分析情况的过程,从而剥夺了自己发展变革性学习能力的机会。在他们目前的专业教育阶段,他们表现出对支持的需要,这可能与教师教育的人本主义观念和解放理性的假设有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Projekt międzynarodowy „Digitally Improving Social and Emotional Skills of Primary School Teachers (DigiSEL)” dla nauczycieli edukacji wczesnoszkolnej Edukacja przyrodnicza w klasach początkowych w koncepcjach studentów pedagogiki wczesnej edukacji. W ślepej uliczce faktografii Rola nauczyciela w zintegrowanym nauczaniu przedmiotowo-językowym (CLIL) na I etapie edukacji wczesnoszkolnej z perspektywy dzieci Nauczyciel wczesnej edukacji z krótkim stażem w zawodzie – praca w stanie wyjątkowym Promoting sustainability training in future teachers through research workshops in the University Ecological Garden
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1