Acquired brain injury (ABI) survivors' experience of occupation and activity during their inpatient stay: a scoping review.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-20 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2023.2281601
Katy Cottrell, Hazel M Chapman
{"title":"Acquired brain injury (ABI) survivors' experience of occupation and activity during their inpatient stay: a scoping review.","authors":"Katy Cottrell, Hazel M Chapman","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2023.2281601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This review aimed to characterise and map: (1) what type of evidence and what dominant study characteristics are available regarding acquired brain injury (ABI) survivors' experience of occupation and activity in hospital? (2) How are occupation and activity conceptualised in the literature? (3) How are ABI survivors experiencing occupation and activity while in hospital? (4) What factors create barriers or opportunities for engagement in occupations or activity in hospital? (5) Are there any knowledge gaps identified?</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted examining literature published between 2017 and 2022. Relevant studies were systematically retrieved from electronic databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four publications were included. There were more quantitative studies (<i>n</i> = 18). Much of the research has been conducted outside of the UK. The populations studied were principally stroke (<i>n</i> = 22). The concept of activity rather than occupation predominates. Patients spend their time alone and inactive. Structural and contextual barriers for engaging in activity are identified. Qualitative study designs exclude ABI survivors with communication or cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a paucity of research with ABI survivors in hospitals in the UK. Alternative methodological approaches such as ethnography would ensure those with communication or cognitive impairment are not excluded from research. Implications for rehabilitationRehabilitation professionals, especially occupational therapists, need to lead acquired brain injury (ABI) research in acute hospital settings in the UK.Conceptualisation of meaningful activity and occupation needs a clearer focus in ABI research.Qualitative studies frequently exclude participants with cognitive or communication impairments so methodologies that are more inclusive and representative of brain injury survivors are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2023.2281601","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This review aimed to characterise and map: (1) what type of evidence and what dominant study characteristics are available regarding acquired brain injury (ABI) survivors' experience of occupation and activity in hospital? (2) How are occupation and activity conceptualised in the literature? (3) How are ABI survivors experiencing occupation and activity while in hospital? (4) What factors create barriers or opportunities for engagement in occupations or activity in hospital? (5) Are there any knowledge gaps identified?

Materials and methods: A scoping review was conducted examining literature published between 2017 and 2022. Relevant studies were systematically retrieved from electronic databases.

Results: Thirty-four publications were included. There were more quantitative studies (n = 18). Much of the research has been conducted outside of the UK. The populations studied were principally stroke (n = 22). The concept of activity rather than occupation predominates. Patients spend their time alone and inactive. Structural and contextual barriers for engaging in activity are identified. Qualitative study designs exclude ABI survivors with communication or cognitive impairment.

Conclusions: There is a paucity of research with ABI survivors in hospitals in the UK. Alternative methodological approaches such as ethnography would ensure those with communication or cognitive impairment are not excluded from research. Implications for rehabilitationRehabilitation professionals, especially occupational therapists, need to lead acquired brain injury (ABI) research in acute hospital settings in the UK.Conceptualisation of meaningful activity and occupation needs a clearer focus in ABI research.Qualitative studies frequently exclude participants with cognitive or communication impairments so methodologies that are more inclusive and representative of brain injury survivors are needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
获得性脑损伤(ABI)幸存者在其住院期间的职业和活动经验:范围审查。
目的:本综述旨在描述和绘制:(1)关于获得性脑损伤(ABI)幸存者在医院的职业和活动经历,现有的证据类型和主要研究特征是什么?(2)在文献中,职业和活动是如何概念化的?(3) ABI幸存者在住院期间如何经历职业和活动?(4)哪些因素造成了从事医院职业或活动的障碍或机会?(5)是否发现了知识缺口?材料和方法:对2017年至2022年发表的文献进行了范围审查。系统地从电子数据库中检索了相关研究。结果:共纳入34篇文献。定量研究较多(n = 18)。大部分研究都是在英国以外进行的。研究人群主要是中风患者(n = 22)。活动而不是职业的概念占主导地位。病人独自度过,不活跃。确定了参与活动的结构和背景障碍。定性研究设计排除了有沟通或认知障碍的ABI幸存者。结论:在英国医院对ABI幸存者的研究很缺乏。人种志等替代方法将确保那些有沟通或认知障碍的人不会被排除在研究之外。对康复的启示康复专业人员,特别是职业治疗师,需要在英国的急性医院环境中领导获得性脑损伤(ABI)的研究。在ABI研究中,有意义的活动和职业的概念化需要更明确的关注。定性研究经常排除认知或沟通障碍的参与者,因此需要更具包容性和代表性的脑损伤幸存者方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
期刊最新文献
A scoping review of observation-based tools for assessing use of the upper limb in activities. The healthcare experience of young stroke survivors: an interpretative phenomenological study. Clinician perspectives of engaging parents in behavioural interventions: a thematic analysis in Aotearoa New Zealand. Effects of inspiratory muscle training on pulmonary function, diaphragmatic thickness, balance and exercise capacity in people after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effectiveness of intensive motor learning approaches from working on a vertical surface on hemiplegic children's upper limb motor skills, a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1