Detection of low bone mineral density in self-referred and medically referred patients

Andrés Heriberto Guillen-Lozoya , Luis E. Segura , Jorge Armando Hermosillo-Villafranca , David Vega-Morales , Pedro Alberto García-Hernández , Brenda Roxana Vázquez-Fuentes , Alejandro Garza-Alpirez , Mario Alberto Garza-Elizondo
{"title":"Detection of low bone mineral density in self-referred and medically referred patients","authors":"Andrés Heriberto Guillen-Lozoya ,&nbsp;Luis E. Segura ,&nbsp;Jorge Armando Hermosillo-Villafranca ,&nbsp;David Vega-Morales ,&nbsp;Pedro Alberto García-Hernández ,&nbsp;Brenda Roxana Vázquez-Fuentes ,&nbsp;Alejandro Garza-Alpirez ,&nbsp;Mario Alberto Garza-Elizondo","doi":"10.1016/j.rcreue.2022.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The Mexican health-care system is a mixture of governmental and private institutions. The osteoporosis screening algorithm has a multiple case start-point, the most common being medical referral; however, self-screening is available where patients can arrange a bone densitometry themselves.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of self-screening for osteoporosis and osteopenia among a Mexican population.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A retrospective observational study was performed as a secondary outcome from an institutional cohort of patients who attended an osteoporosis center. We divided the cohort into two groups: self-referred patients and medical-referred patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The overall prevalence of osteoporosis between the two groups was 1160 (self-referred <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->44; 29.5% vs medical-referred <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->227; 22.5%; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.057) (OR (Odds Ratio); 95% CI (Confidence Interval): 1.44; .98–2.12) and the prevalence of osteopenia was (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->122; 81.9% vs <em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->811; 80.2%; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.633) (OR (Odds Ratio); 95% CI (Confidence Interval): 1.11; .71–1.73).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There was no statistical difference between the self-referred and the medically referred patients in the overall diagnosis of osteoporosis and/or osteopenia. Nevertheless, the incidence of osteoporosis and osteopenia as an outcome for the self-referred patients was not lower than that of those with a medical referral.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101099,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Reumatología (English Edition)","volume":"30 4","pages":"Pages 305-309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de Reumatología (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S244444052300081X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The Mexican health-care system is a mixture of governmental and private institutions. The osteoporosis screening algorithm has a multiple case start-point, the most common being medical referral; however, self-screening is available where patients can arrange a bone densitometry themselves.

Objective

The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of self-screening for osteoporosis and osteopenia among a Mexican population.

Materials and methods

A retrospective observational study was performed as a secondary outcome from an institutional cohort of patients who attended an osteoporosis center. We divided the cohort into two groups: self-referred patients and medical-referred patients.

Results

The overall prevalence of osteoporosis between the two groups was 1160 (self-referred n = 44; 29.5% vs medical-referred n = 227; 22.5%; p = .057) (OR (Odds Ratio); 95% CI (Confidence Interval): 1.44; .98–2.12) and the prevalence of osteopenia was (n = 122; 81.9% vs n = 811; 80.2%; p = .633) (OR (Odds Ratio); 95% CI (Confidence Interval): 1.11; .71–1.73).

Conclusion

There was no statistical difference between the self-referred and the medically referred patients in the overall diagnosis of osteoporosis and/or osteopenia. Nevertheless, the incidence of osteoporosis and osteopenia as an outcome for the self-referred patients was not lower than that of those with a medical referral.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我转诊和医学转诊患者低骨密度的检测
墨西哥的卫生保健系统是政府和私人机构的混合体。骨质疏松筛查算法有多病例起点,最常见的是医疗转诊;然而,自我筛查是可行的,患者可以自己安排骨密度测定。目的本研究的目的是评估墨西哥人群骨质疏松和骨质减少自我筛查的影响。材料和方法一项回顾性观察性研究作为次要结果,来自骨质疏松症中心的机构队列患者。我们将队列分为两组:自我转诊患者和医疗转诊患者。结果两组骨质疏松症总患病率为1160例(自我参考n = 44;29.5% vs医疗参考n = 227;22.5%;p = 0.057) (OR(优势比);95% CI(置信区间):1.44;.98-2.12),骨量减少的患病率为(n = 122;81.9% vs n = 811;80.2%;p = .633) (OR(优势比);95% CI(置信区间):1.11;点- 1.73)。结论自诊患者与转诊患者骨质疏松和/或骨质减少的总体诊断率无统计学差异。然而,骨质疏松症和骨质减少的发生率,作为一个结果,自我转诊的患者并不低于那些与医疗转诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Validation of FACIT-fatigue in Spanish-speaking patients with rheumatoid arthritis A comparison of core muscle endurance of females with fibromyalgia versus healthy females: An observational study Central tolerance in T cells, what’s new? Evaluation of clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis from the patient's perspective: a narrative review of the literature Balancing inflammation and adverse effects of glucocorticoids in clinical practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1