The contagion mechanism and governance strategy of corporate social irresponsibility of Chinese food companies

IF 6.8 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Food Policy Pub Date : 2023-11-25 DOI:10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102569
Gang Tian , Yumeng Wang , Yu Gong , Yi Tian , Xuexu Piao , Tianyu Zhang
{"title":"The contagion mechanism and governance strategy of corporate social irresponsibility of Chinese food companies","authors":"Gang Tian ,&nbsp;Yumeng Wang ,&nbsp;Yu Gong ,&nbsp;Yi Tian ,&nbsp;Xuexu Piao ,&nbsp;Tianyu Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>From a global perspective, the incidents of food fraud are still increasing in recent years, which shows that the food safety issue has not been well addressed. As a major world food exporter and importer, egregious incidents of corporate social irresponsibility (CSI) for domestic food companies were discovered in China. Although the Chinese government has been strengthening the supervision on food companies, the governance effect is not obvious. This research focuses on the governance of the CSI behavior of food companies. As opposed to the existing literature based on Neoclassical economics, this article analyzes food companies' CSI by applying a behavioral economic framework. The system dynamics method is used to analyze the implementation effect of the corresponding governance strategy. Researchers discovered that the short-sighted cognitive bias of food companies is the primary reason for CSI, which results in the self-reinforcing effect and interactive contagion effect. Under the current imperfect institutional environment, these effects will be further amplified to present a crisis of collective irresponsibility. This study provides timely evidence and significant regulatory implications for the ongoing food safety crisis in China. In order to control the contagion of CSI in the food industry, the government should increase its sanctions on irresponsible food companies from the short-term perspective. The government should also establish a fair and standardized market competition order and improve the information disclosure mechanisms and third-party governance mechanisms in the long term. These actions will contribute to a more comprehensive research perspective on food safety governance and, additionally, and to develop more targeted strategic tools for the government to regulate the food market. Our insights can also provide a reference for other countries and industries facing similar challenges.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919223001677/pdfft?md5=eafffd3110777c3430443e8497ae026a&pid=1-s2.0-S0306919223001677-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919223001677","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From a global perspective, the incidents of food fraud are still increasing in recent years, which shows that the food safety issue has not been well addressed. As a major world food exporter and importer, egregious incidents of corporate social irresponsibility (CSI) for domestic food companies were discovered in China. Although the Chinese government has been strengthening the supervision on food companies, the governance effect is not obvious. This research focuses on the governance of the CSI behavior of food companies. As opposed to the existing literature based on Neoclassical economics, this article analyzes food companies' CSI by applying a behavioral economic framework. The system dynamics method is used to analyze the implementation effect of the corresponding governance strategy. Researchers discovered that the short-sighted cognitive bias of food companies is the primary reason for CSI, which results in the self-reinforcing effect and interactive contagion effect. Under the current imperfect institutional environment, these effects will be further amplified to present a crisis of collective irresponsibility. This study provides timely evidence and significant regulatory implications for the ongoing food safety crisis in China. In order to control the contagion of CSI in the food industry, the government should increase its sanctions on irresponsible food companies from the short-term perspective. The government should also establish a fair and standardized market competition order and improve the information disclosure mechanisms and third-party governance mechanisms in the long term. These actions will contribute to a more comprehensive research perspective on food safety governance and, additionally, and to develop more targeted strategic tools for the government to regulate the food market. Our insights can also provide a reference for other countries and industries facing similar challenges.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国食品企业社会责任缺失的传染机制及治理策略
从全球范围来看,近年来食品欺诈事件仍在增加,这表明食品安全问题并没有得到很好的解决。作为世界主要的食品出口国和进口国,中国国内食品企业的社会不负责任(CSI)事件层出不穷。虽然中国政府一直在加强对食品企业的监管,但治理效果并不明显。本研究的重点是食品企业CSI行为的治理。与已有的基于新古典经济学的文献不同,本文运用行为经济学的框架对食品企业CSI进行分析。运用系统动力学方法分析相应治理策略的实施效果。研究发现,食品企业的短视认知偏差是CSI产生的主要原因,它产生了自我强化效应和互动传染效应。在当前不完善的制度环境下,这些影响将进一步放大,形成集体不负责任的危机。本研究为中国持续的食品安全危机提供了及时的证据和重要的监管启示。为了控制CSI在食品行业的蔓延,政府应该从短期的角度加大对不负责任的食品企业的制裁力度。政府还应建立公平、规范的市场竞争秩序,长期完善信息披露机制和第三方治理机制。这些行动将有助于对食品安全治理有一个更全面的研究视角,此外,还将为政府监管食品市场制定更有针对性的战略工具。我们的见解也可以为其他面临类似挑战的国家和行业提供借鉴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
期刊最新文献
Reflections on food policy in the context of healthy and sustainable diets The impact of pre-empting dual food quality regulation on product reformulation and packaging Autopsy of a futures market failure: Japan’s Dojima rice futures in the early 21st century Women improving nutrition through self-help groups in India: Does nutrition information help? Integrating system dynamics to value chain analysis to address price volatility in the Indonesian chilli value chain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1