Eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy in prison and forensic services: a qualitative study of lived experience.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY European Journal of Psychotraumatology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-27 DOI:10.1080/20008066.2023.2282029
Susanna Every-Palmer, Brigit Ross, Tom Flewett, Eoghan Rutledge, Oliver Hansby, Elliot Bell
{"title":"Eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy in prison and forensic services: a qualitative study of lived experience.","authors":"Susanna Every-Palmer, Brigit Ross, Tom Flewett, Eoghan Rutledge, Oliver Hansby, Elliot Bell","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2023.2282029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is common in people with serious mental illness who come into contact with the criminal justice system. Little evidence exists on EMDR treatment in forensic mental health, with no prior qualitative research exploring lived experience perspectives.<b>Objective:</b> This qualitative study recruited adult forensic mental health patients with PTSD and psychotic disorders, predominantly schizophrenia, who had received EMDR as part of a clinical trial, either in prison or in hospital. We sought to understand their experiences of EMDR therapy while receiving forensic care.<b>Method:</b> Ten in-depth, semi-structured qualitative interviews were undertaken and analysed using thematic analysis. We used an inductive, realist approach, reporting the experiences, meanings, and reality of the participants.<b>Results:</b> Five overarching themes were identified. First, severe trauma was ubiquitous and participants felt <i>Seriously Messed Up</i> by their traumatic experiences, with debilitating and enduring PTSD symptoms contributing to offending and psychosis ('giving the voices something to feed on'). Second, EMDR was regarded with <i>Early Scepticism</i>. Third, the therapy itself was initially emotionally taxing and <i>Not Easy</i> but participants generally felt safe and persevered. Fourth, they were often surprised and delighted by results (<i>And it Worked!</i>), describing significant symptom reduction and personal transformation. Lastly, EMDR <i>Fits the Forensic Setting,</i> bringing empowerment in a place perceived as disempowering. People reported changes that increased their hope in a violence-free future.<b>Conclusions:</b> The limited research on EMDR in forensic mental health is unfortunate given how common PTSD is in mentally unwell offenders and its potential to impede recovery and contribute to further offending. This first qualitative study found participants experienced positive transformative change, extending beyond symptom reduction. Themes support previously published quantitative outcomes showing EMDR to be safe and effective in this cohort. EMDR was well suited to a forensic setting and was seen as an empowering therapy.<b>Trial registration:</b> Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry identifier: ACTRN12618000683235.<b>Study registration:</b> The study was registered on the Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Network, registration number ACTRN12618000683235 (registered prospectively, 24 April 2018), https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id = 374682.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"14 2","pages":"2282029"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10993806/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2023.2282029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is common in people with serious mental illness who come into contact with the criminal justice system. Little evidence exists on EMDR treatment in forensic mental health, with no prior qualitative research exploring lived experience perspectives.Objective: This qualitative study recruited adult forensic mental health patients with PTSD and psychotic disorders, predominantly schizophrenia, who had received EMDR as part of a clinical trial, either in prison or in hospital. We sought to understand their experiences of EMDR therapy while receiving forensic care.Method: Ten in-depth, semi-structured qualitative interviews were undertaken and analysed using thematic analysis. We used an inductive, realist approach, reporting the experiences, meanings, and reality of the participants.Results: Five overarching themes were identified. First, severe trauma was ubiquitous and participants felt Seriously Messed Up by their traumatic experiences, with debilitating and enduring PTSD symptoms contributing to offending and psychosis ('giving the voices something to feed on'). Second, EMDR was regarded with Early Scepticism. Third, the therapy itself was initially emotionally taxing and Not Easy but participants generally felt safe and persevered. Fourth, they were often surprised and delighted by results (And it Worked!), describing significant symptom reduction and personal transformation. Lastly, EMDR Fits the Forensic Setting, bringing empowerment in a place perceived as disempowering. People reported changes that increased their hope in a violence-free future.Conclusions: The limited research on EMDR in forensic mental health is unfortunate given how common PTSD is in mentally unwell offenders and its potential to impede recovery and contribute to further offending. This first qualitative study found participants experienced positive transformative change, extending beyond symptom reduction. Themes support previously published quantitative outcomes showing EMDR to be safe and effective in this cohort. EMDR was well suited to a forensic setting and was seen as an empowering therapy.Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry identifier: ACTRN12618000683235.Study registration: The study was registered on the Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Network, registration number ACTRN12618000683235 (registered prospectively, 24 April 2018), https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id = 374682.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼动脱敏和再处理(EMDR)治疗在监狱和法医服务:生活经验的定性研究。
背景:创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)在与刑事司法系统接触的严重精神疾病患者中很常见。很少有证据表明EMDR在法医心理健康方面的治疗,没有先前的定性研究探索生活经验的观点。目的:本定性研究招募了患有创伤后应激障碍和精神障碍(主要是精神分裂症)的成年法医精神健康患者,他们在监狱或医院接受了EMDR作为临床试验的一部分。我们试图了解他们在接受法医护理时EMDR治疗的经历。方法:进行10次深入的半结构化定性访谈,并采用主题分析方法进行分析。我们采用归纳、现实主义的方法,报告参与者的经历、意义和现实。结果:确定了五个总体主题。首先,严重的创伤无处不在,参与者因他们的创伤经历而感到严重混乱,衰弱和持久的创伤后应激障碍症状会导致冒犯和精神错乱(“给那些声音提供了食物”)。其次,EMDR在早期受到怀疑。第三,治疗本身最初在情感上很费力,也不容易,但参与者普遍感到安全,并坚持了下来。第四,他们经常对结果感到惊讶和高兴(而且它起作用了!),描述了显著的症状减轻和个人转变。最后,EMDR适合法医环境,在一个被认为没有权力的地方赋予权力。人们报告的变化增加了他们对无暴力未来的希望。结论:鉴于PTSD在精神不健康的罪犯中很常见,而且它有可能阻碍康复并导致进一步的犯罪,因此对法医心理健康的EMDR的有限研究是不幸的。第一项定性研究发现,参与者经历了积极的变革性变化,不仅仅是症状减轻。主题支持先前发表的量化结果,表明EMDR在该队列中是安全有效的。EMDR非常适合法医环境,被视为一种赋权疗法。试验注册:澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册标识:ACTRN12618000683235。研究注册:该研究在澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验网络注册,注册号为ACTRN12618000683235(前瞻性注册,2018年4月24日),https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id = 374682。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Effect of Restricted Repair on System Reliability Indices
IF 5.9 2区 计算机科学IEEE Transactions on ReliabilityPub Date : 1978-12-01 DOI: 10.1109/TR.1978.5220431
R. Billinton;M. Alam
Effect of restricted repair on system reliability indices
IF 1.6 4区 工程技术Microelectronics ReliabilityPub Date : 1979-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/0026-2714(79)90426-8
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.
期刊最新文献
ICD-11 posttraumatic stress disorder and complex PTSD: prevalence, predictors, and construct validity in Swiss older adults. The factor structure of the International Trauma Questionnaire - Heywood cases in confirmatory factor analysis. A journey towards a trauma informed and responsive Justice system: the perspectives and experiences of senior Justice workers. Validation of the International Trauma Interview (ITI) among treatment-seeking people with adverse childhood experiences in South Korea. Childhood abuse and neglect and adult body attitude.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1