Is your search query well-formed? A natural query understanding for patent prior art search

IF 2.2 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE World Patent Information Pub Date : 2023-11-27 DOI:10.1016/j.wpi.2023.102254
Renukswamy Chikkamath , Deepak Rastogi , Mahesh Maan , Markus Endres
{"title":"Is your search query well-formed? A natural query understanding for patent prior art search","authors":"Renukswamy Chikkamath ,&nbsp;Deepak Rastogi ,&nbsp;Mahesh Maan ,&nbsp;Markus Endres","doi":"10.1016/j.wpi.2023.102254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Recent advances in Deep Learning<span> based prior art search has enabled the development of easy-to-use prior art search engines that accept natural language search queries and provide improved search performance. However, unlike conventional keyword-based techniques where the results are readily interpreted by the presence of queried keywords, Deep Learning based techniques act like a black box. As a result, it is difficult for users to articulate their information in order to obtain optimal results. In this paper, we share insights on query well-formedness from extensive experimentation with PQAI,</span></span><span><sup>1</sup></span><span> an open source Deep Learning based prior art search engine. We study the effects of various query parameters such as grammar, specificity, and verbosity on the search results and show that ill-formed queries containing grammatical errors, non-essential content, and broad terminology adversely affect the relevance of search results. We also develop a number of Machine Learning models, viz. Grammatical Error Detection Model (GEDM), Query Specificity Model (QSM), and Query Verbosity Model (QVM), to identify and mitigate commonly encountered issues with ill-formed queries. The data, survey forms, and code relating to this work will be released to the community</span><span><sup>2</sup></span>. Towards future breakthroughs, critical areas of query understanding in prior art search for advancing research are given in the end.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51794,"journal":{"name":"World Patent Information","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 102254"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Patent Information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0172219023000844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent advances in Deep Learning based prior art search has enabled the development of easy-to-use prior art search engines that accept natural language search queries and provide improved search performance. However, unlike conventional keyword-based techniques where the results are readily interpreted by the presence of queried keywords, Deep Learning based techniques act like a black box. As a result, it is difficult for users to articulate their information in order to obtain optimal results. In this paper, we share insights on query well-formedness from extensive experimentation with PQAI,1 an open source Deep Learning based prior art search engine. We study the effects of various query parameters such as grammar, specificity, and verbosity on the search results and show that ill-formed queries containing grammatical errors, non-essential content, and broad terminology adversely affect the relevance of search results. We also develop a number of Machine Learning models, viz. Grammatical Error Detection Model (GEDM), Query Specificity Model (QSM), and Query Verbosity Model (QVM), to identify and mitigate commonly encountered issues with ill-formed queries. The data, survey forms, and code relating to this work will be released to the community2. Towards future breakthroughs, critical areas of query understanding in prior art search for advancing research are given in the end.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
您的搜索查询是否格式良好?专利现有技术检索的自然查询理解
基于深度学习的现有技术搜索的最新进展使得开发易于使用的现有技术搜索引擎能够接受自然语言搜索查询并提供改进的搜索性能。然而,与传统的基于关键字的技术不同,传统的基于关键字的技术很容易通过查询关键字的存在来解释结果,基于深度学习的技术就像一个黑匣子。因此,用户很难清晰地表达他们的信息以获得最佳结果。在本文中,我们分享了通过PQAI(1一个基于开源深度学习的现有技术搜索引擎)的大量实验得出的关于查询格式良好性的见解。我们研究了各种查询参数(如语法、特异性和冗长性)对搜索结果的影响,并表明包含语法错误、非必要内容和宽泛术语的格式错误查询会对搜索结果的相关性产生不利影响。我们还开发了许多机器学习模型,即语法错误检测模型(GEDM),查询特异性模型(QSM)和查询冗长性模型(QVM),以识别和缓解常见的格式错误查询问题。与这项工作相关的数据、调查表格和代码将发布给社区2。展望未来的突破,最后给出了现有技术搜索中查询理解的关键领域,以推进研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Patent Information
World Patent Information INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
18.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The aim of World Patent Information is to provide a worldwide forum for the exchange of information between people working professionally in the field of Industrial Property information and documentation and to promote the widest possible use of the associated literature. Regular features include: papers concerned with all aspects of Industrial Property information and documentation; new regulations pertinent to Industrial Property information and documentation; short reports on relevant meetings and conferences; bibliographies, together with book and literature reviews.
期刊最新文献
A novel approach to measuring the scope of patent claims based on probabilities obtained from (large) language models Laser-based disassembly of end-of-life automotive traction batteries: A systematic patent analysis Factors affecting patent applicant choice of International Searching Authority Comprehensive analysis of the current status and future trends of microalgae bioreactors using patent and bibliometric approaches Leveraging NLP and web knowledge graphs to harmonize locations: A case study on US patent transactions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1