Patient-centered health care planning in acute inpatient mental health settings: a best practice implementation project.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Jbi Evidence Implementation Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000381
Corina Gagiu, Doina C Mazilu, Mariana Zazu, Viorica Nedelcu, Dorinela A Jitianu, Mirela Manea, Tereza Vrbová, Miloslav Klugar, Jitka Klugarová
{"title":"Patient-centered health care planning in acute inpatient mental health settings: a best practice implementation project.","authors":"Corina Gagiu, Doina C Mazilu, Mariana Zazu, Viorica Nedelcu, Dorinela A Jitianu, Mirela Manea, Tereza Vrbová, Miloslav Klugar, Jitka Klugarová","doi":"10.1097/XEB.0000000000000381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The current project aimed to improve the quality of health care by promoting evidence-based practice (EBP) regarding mental health care planning (MHCP) for adult inpatients.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The implementation of the best evidence in the process of developing and documenting nursing care plans is currently an important legal requirement that contributes to increasing the quality of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This implementation project was based on the JBI evidence implementation approach and included a baseline audit of seven criteria, implementation of strategies, and a follow-up audit. The project was conducted in an acute psychiatric setting at a university hospital in Bucharest, Romania. The sample included 17 nurses and 30 ward patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline audit revealed low compliance (33%-37%) for criterion 3 (a comprehensive care plan) and criterion 4 (patient involvement); moderate compliance (55%) for criterion 1 (care plan for all patients); and increased compliance (97%-100%) for criterion 2 (assessment of patient's needs), criterion 5 (education of patients/caregivers), criterion 6 (providing a copy at discharge), and criterion 7 (education of professionals). As a result of implementing the most appropriate strategies, the maximum improvement (100%) was observed across all five audit criteria that were found to be deficient in the baseline audit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The development and implementation of strategies adapted to specific care need to play a key role in the implementation of EBP. In this case, educating nurses, facilitating nurses' access to EBP for care planning, and improving procedures proved effective in achieving maximum compliance with all the audit criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":48473,"journal":{"name":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000381","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The current project aimed to improve the quality of health care by promoting evidence-based practice (EBP) regarding mental health care planning (MHCP) for adult inpatients.

Introduction: The implementation of the best evidence in the process of developing and documenting nursing care plans is currently an important legal requirement that contributes to increasing the quality of care.

Methods: This implementation project was based on the JBI evidence implementation approach and included a baseline audit of seven criteria, implementation of strategies, and a follow-up audit. The project was conducted in an acute psychiatric setting at a university hospital in Bucharest, Romania. The sample included 17 nurses and 30 ward patients.

Results: The baseline audit revealed low compliance (33%-37%) for criterion 3 (a comprehensive care plan) and criterion 4 (patient involvement); moderate compliance (55%) for criterion 1 (care plan for all patients); and increased compliance (97%-100%) for criterion 2 (assessment of patient's needs), criterion 5 (education of patients/caregivers), criterion 6 (providing a copy at discharge), and criterion 7 (education of professionals). As a result of implementing the most appropriate strategies, the maximum improvement (100%) was observed across all five audit criteria that were found to be deficient in the baseline audit.

Conclusion: The development and implementation of strategies adapted to specific care need to play a key role in the implementation of EBP. In this case, educating nurses, facilitating nurses' access to EBP for care planning, and improving procedures proved effective in achieving maximum compliance with all the audit criteria.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以病人为中心的急性住院精神卫生保健规划:最佳实践实施项目。
目的:本项目旨在通过促进成人住院患者精神卫生保健计划(MHCP)的循证实践(EBP)来提高卫生保健质量。导言:在制定和记录护理计划的过程中实施最佳证据是目前一项重要的法律要求,有助于提高护理质量。方法:该实施项目基于JBI证据实施方法,包括七个标准的基线审计、实施策略和后续审计。该项目是在罗马尼亚布加勒斯特一所大学医院的急性精神病环境中进行的。样本包括17名护士和30名病房病人。结果:基线审计显示标准3(综合护理计划)和标准4(患者参与)的依从性较低(33%-37%);标准1(所有患者的护理计划)的中度依从性(55%);标准2(患者需求评估)、标准5(患者/护理人员教育)、标准6(出院时提供复印件)和标准7(专业人员教育)的依从性提高(97%-100%)。由于实施了最适当的策略,在基线审计中发现的所有五个审计标准中都观察到最大的改进(100%)。结论:制定和实施适合特殊护理的策略是实施EBP的关键。在这种情况下,教育护士,促进护士使用EBP进行护理计划,改进程序被证明是有效的,可以最大限度地遵守所有审计标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Comparison of two audit and feedback approaches: descriptive analysis of personal and contextual dynamics. Collaborative implementation science: a Can-SOLVE CKD case example. Improving communication among nursing staff at a children's hospital in the southern United States: a best practice implementation project. Improving the quality of medication administration practices in a tertiary Australian hospital: a best practice implementation project. Cross-disciplinary advance care planning in oncology and palliative care amidst a pandemic: a best practice implementation project.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1