How good is lobectomy for the Turkish population with papillary thyroid cancer? A clinicopathological evaluation.

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY Turkish Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2023-09-27 eCollection Date: 2023-09-01 DOI:10.47717/turkjsurg.2023.6210
Can Konca
{"title":"How good is lobectomy for the Turkish population with papillary thyroid cancer? A clinicopathological evaluation.","authors":"Can Konca","doi":"10.47717/turkjsurg.2023.6210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In modern practice, there is an increasing recommendation for higher utilization of lobectomy in the management of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). However, in this decision where the optimal balance of locoregional recurrence and complication burden should be achieved, there are still conflicting results in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of high-risk factors in the Turkish population with PTC on the decision of hypothetical lobectomy.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this study, 96 PTC patients undergoing total thyroidectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation differences and the impact of high-risk factors (tumor size, multifocality, extrathyroidal extension and central lymph node metastasis) on the decision for hypothetical lobectomy were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all patients and lobectomy-eligible patients, postoperative evaluations of multifocality, contralateral multifocality, and central lymph node metastases were significantly higher than preoperative evaluations. Consequently, postoperative evaluation revealed that completion thyroidectomy would be required in 52.9% of 51 patients who were hypothetically suitable for lobectomy. Furthermore, comparisons of tumor size-based grouping in lobectomy and total thyroidectomy suitable patients showed similar high-risk factor distribution except for central lymph node metastasis for tumors <10 mm and contralateral multifocality between 11-20 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Completion thyroidectomy will be required in approximately half of the patients evaluated as suitable for lobectomy in the treatment of PTC in the Turkish population. In the treatment decision, in which many patient- and surgeon-related factors are influential, each patient should be considered separately.</p>","PeriodicalId":23374,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10696446/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47717/turkjsurg.2023.6210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In modern practice, there is an increasing recommendation for higher utilization of lobectomy in the management of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). However, in this decision where the optimal balance of locoregional recurrence and complication burden should be achieved, there are still conflicting results in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of high-risk factors in the Turkish population with PTC on the decision of hypothetical lobectomy.

Material and methods: In this study, 96 PTC patients undergoing total thyroidectomy were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation differences and the impact of high-risk factors (tumor size, multifocality, extrathyroidal extension and central lymph node metastasis) on the decision for hypothetical lobectomy were investigated.

Results: In all patients and lobectomy-eligible patients, postoperative evaluations of multifocality, contralateral multifocality, and central lymph node metastases were significantly higher than preoperative evaluations. Consequently, postoperative evaluation revealed that completion thyroidectomy would be required in 52.9% of 51 patients who were hypothetically suitable for lobectomy. Furthermore, comparisons of tumor size-based grouping in lobectomy and total thyroidectomy suitable patients showed similar high-risk factor distribution except for central lymph node metastasis for tumors <10 mm and contralateral multifocality between 11-20 mm.

Conclusion: Completion thyroidectomy will be required in approximately half of the patients evaluated as suitable for lobectomy in the treatment of PTC in the Turkish population. In the treatment decision, in which many patient- and surgeon-related factors are influential, each patient should be considered separately.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对于患有甲状腺乳头状癌的土耳其人来说,肺叶切除术有多好?临床病理评价。
目的:在现代实践中,越来越多的人建议在甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)的治疗中使用更高的肺叶切除术。然而,在如何在局部复发和并发症负担之间取得最佳平衡的问题上,文献中仍然存在相互矛盾的结果。本研究的目的是评估土耳其PTC人群中高危因素对假设的肺叶切除术决定的影响。材料与方法:回顾性分析96例行甲状腺全切除术的PTC患者。探讨术前术后评价差异及高危因素(肿瘤大小、多发灶性、甲状腺外展及中央淋巴结转移)对假设性肺叶切除术决定的影响。结果:在所有患者和符合肺叶切除术条件的患者中,术后对多灶性、对侧多灶性和中央淋巴结转移的评估均显著高于术前评估。因此,术后评估显示51例假设适合肺叶切除术的患者中有52.9%需要完成甲状腺切除术。此外,比较基于肿瘤大小分组的肺叶切除术和甲状腺全切除术适合患者显示出相似的高危因素分布,除了肿瘤的中央淋巴结转移。结论:在土耳其人群中,大约一半的评估为适合肺叶切除术治疗PTC的患者需要完成甲状腺切除术。在治疗决策中,许多与患者和外科相关的因素都有影响,每个患者都应该单独考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
FROM THE EDITOR'S DESK. Musinous cystic neoplasia mimicking hydatid cyst in the liver: Two rare cases Comments on ‘Percutaneous gas decompression can ease endoscopic derotation in sigmoid volvulus’ Pathological complete response and associated factors in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A retrospective study Effect of silver colloid dressing over conventional dressings in diabetic foot ulcer: A prospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1