Pancreatic fistula and bleeding following choledochal cyst excision: Experience of two decades.

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY Turkish Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-06-28 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6354
Sai Krishna Katakam, Supriya Sharma, Anu Behari, Rahul R, Ashok Kumar Ii, Ashish Singh, Rajneesh Singh, Ashok Kumar, Rajan Saxena
{"title":"Pancreatic fistula and bleeding following choledochal cyst excision: Experience of two decades.","authors":"Sai Krishna Katakam, Supriya Sharma, Anu Behari, Rahul R, Ashok Kumar Ii, Ashish Singh, Rajneesh Singh, Ashok Kumar, Rajan Saxena","doi":"10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Choledochal cyst excision (CDCE) with hepaticojejunostomy is standard of care in choledochal cysts. Complications related to inadequate healing of distal stump like post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and bleeds have not been addressed in literature. We report two decade experience with these complications following CDCE.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of demographics, operative details and post-operative course of patients who developed POPF (according to International Study group of Pancreas surgery classification) and bleeds following CDCE were compared with those who did not develop these complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>POPF was seen in in 34 out of 377 operated patients (incidence of 9%). In those with POPF, 24/34 (70%) had biochemical leak and 10/34 (30%) had clinically relevant POPF (B and C). All grade B POPF 6/34, required additional percutaneous drains while all grade C 4/34 required operative intervention to control sepsis. There was no mortality in the POPF group while two patients in control died from non-surgical causes. A difficult distal stump precluding closure was the only factor found associated with subsequent development of POPF (5.9% in POPF group vs. 0.5% in control group, p= 0.03). Post-operative bleeding was seen in 2 (6%) patients with POPF and in 5/343 (1.4%) in control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is possible to anticipate development of POPF intraoperatively, during CDCE. Most of these POPFs can be managed conservatively with adequate drainage. Surgery is required only in grade C fistula and bleeds. Since these are isolated pancreatic fistulas, unlike those seen after pancreaticoduodenectomy, they are associated with more favourable outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23374,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","volume":"40 2","pages":"104-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610618/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Choledochal cyst excision (CDCE) with hepaticojejunostomy is standard of care in choledochal cysts. Complications related to inadequate healing of distal stump like post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and bleeds have not been addressed in literature. We report two decade experience with these complications following CDCE.

Material and methods: Retrospective analysis of demographics, operative details and post-operative course of patients who developed POPF (according to International Study group of Pancreas surgery classification) and bleeds following CDCE were compared with those who did not develop these complications.

Results: POPF was seen in in 34 out of 377 operated patients (incidence of 9%). In those with POPF, 24/34 (70%) had biochemical leak and 10/34 (30%) had clinically relevant POPF (B and C). All grade B POPF 6/34, required additional percutaneous drains while all grade C 4/34 required operative intervention to control sepsis. There was no mortality in the POPF group while two patients in control died from non-surgical causes. A difficult distal stump precluding closure was the only factor found associated with subsequent development of POPF (5.9% in POPF group vs. 0.5% in control group, p= 0.03). Post-operative bleeding was seen in 2 (6%) patients with POPF and in 5/343 (1.4%) in control group.

Conclusion: It is possible to anticipate development of POPF intraoperatively, during CDCE. Most of these POPFs can be managed conservatively with adequate drainage. Surgery is required only in grade C fistula and bleeds. Since these are isolated pancreatic fistulas, unlike those seen after pancreaticoduodenectomy, they are associated with more favourable outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胆总管囊肿切除术后胰瘘及出血:二十年的经验。
目的:胆总管囊肿切除合并肝空肠吻合术是胆总管囊肿的标准治疗方法。与远端残端愈合不充分相关的并发症,如术后胰瘘(POPF)和出血,尚未在文献中得到解决。我们报告了二十年来CDCE后这些并发症的经验。材料和方法:回顾性分析发生POPF(根据国际胰腺外科研究小组分类)和CDCE后出血的患者的人口统计学、手术细节和术后病程,并与未发生这些并发症的患者进行比较。结果:377例手术患者中有34例出现POPF,发生率为9%。在POPF患者中,24/34(70%)有生化泄漏,10/34(30%)有临床相关的POPF (B和C)。所有B级POPF 6/34需要额外的经皮引流,而所有C级POPF 4/34需要手术干预以控制脓毒症。POPF组无死亡病例,对照组2例非手术死亡。难以关闭远端残端是发现与POPF后续发展相关的唯一因素(POPF组为5.9%,对照组为0.5%,p= 0.03)。术后出血2例(6%),对照组5/343例(1.4%)。结论:在CDCE术中预测POPF的发展是可能的。大多数的popf可以通过适当的引流进行保守的管理。只有C级瘘管和出血才需要手术。由于这些是孤立的胰瘘,不像胰十二指肠切除术后看到的那样,它们与更有利的结果相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Juvenile papillomatosis: A case report. Inferior vena cava injuries: Are we doing what we really must? Laparoscopic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary carcinoma: An experience of 50 cases from a single tertiary care center. Pancreatic fistula and bleeding following choledochal cyst excision: Experience of two decades. Predictors of citations and altmetric scores in general surgery literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1