Long-term conservation and conventional tillage systems impact physical and biochemical soil health indicators in a corn–soybean rotation

IF 2.4 3区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Soil Science Society of America Journal Pub Date : 2023-06-06 DOI:10.1002/saj2.20563
Anuoluwa O. Sangotayo, Jemila Chellappa, Udayakumar Sekaran, Sangeeta Bansal, Padma Angmo, Paul Jasa, Sandeep Kumar, Javed Iqbal
{"title":"Long-term conservation and conventional tillage systems impact physical and biochemical soil health indicators in a corn–soybean rotation","authors":"Anuoluwa O. Sangotayo, Jemila Chellappa, Udayakumar Sekaran, Sangeeta Bansal, Padma Angmo, Paul Jasa, Sandeep Kumar, Javed Iqbal","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agricultural management practices tend to influence soil structure stabilization, mediating many physical, chemical, and biological processes in soils. Therefore, understanding the long-term effects of management practices on various soil health indicators is crucial to develop sustainable agricultural practices. This study aimed to assess the long-term conventional and conservation tillage effects on soil physical (aggregates) and biochemical (soil organic carbon [SOC], enzymes, and microbial biomass) parameters under a range of tillage practices in a corn–soybean rotation in Nebraska. The experiment was conducted at two locations as follows: (1) Concord site (36 years) with the three treatments: no-till (NT), disk, and moldboard plow; and (2) Lincoln site (40 years) with four tillage treatments: NT, double disk, chisel, and moldboard plow. Results showed that NT at both sites significantly increased SOC concentration by 24%–66% compared to moldboard plow. Similarly, double disk tillage increased SOC by 54% compared to the moldboard plow at the Lincoln site. Arylsulfatase, β-glucosidase, hot- and cold-water extractable carbon, microbial biomass carbon, and nitrogen concentrations significantly decreased with the increased tillage intensity at both sites. This implies that the NT increased these parameters compared to the disk and moldboard plow. However, aggregate size fraction 0.053–0.25 mm was the only parameter higher under moldboard plow (20.8%) than NT. Overall, the results from these long-term studies indicate that NT, and to a lesser extent the reduced tillage practice of disk till, can improve soil health more than conventional tillage practices under a corn–soybean cropping system, suggesting the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices to improve soil health.","PeriodicalId":22142,"journal":{"name":"Soil Science Society of America Journal","volume":"204 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Science Society of America Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20563","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural management practices tend to influence soil structure stabilization, mediating many physical, chemical, and biological processes in soils. Therefore, understanding the long-term effects of management practices on various soil health indicators is crucial to develop sustainable agricultural practices. This study aimed to assess the long-term conventional and conservation tillage effects on soil physical (aggregates) and biochemical (soil organic carbon [SOC], enzymes, and microbial biomass) parameters under a range of tillage practices in a corn–soybean rotation in Nebraska. The experiment was conducted at two locations as follows: (1) Concord site (36 years) with the three treatments: no-till (NT), disk, and moldboard plow; and (2) Lincoln site (40 years) with four tillage treatments: NT, double disk, chisel, and moldboard plow. Results showed that NT at both sites significantly increased SOC concentration by 24%–66% compared to moldboard plow. Similarly, double disk tillage increased SOC by 54% compared to the moldboard plow at the Lincoln site. Arylsulfatase, β-glucosidase, hot- and cold-water extractable carbon, microbial biomass carbon, and nitrogen concentrations significantly decreased with the increased tillage intensity at both sites. This implies that the NT increased these parameters compared to the disk and moldboard plow. However, aggregate size fraction 0.053–0.25 mm was the only parameter higher under moldboard plow (20.8%) than NT. Overall, the results from these long-term studies indicate that NT, and to a lesser extent the reduced tillage practice of disk till, can improve soil health more than conventional tillage practices under a corn–soybean cropping system, suggesting the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices to improve soil health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长期保护性耕作和常规耕作制度对玉米-大豆轮作土壤物理和生化健康指标的影响
农业管理实践往往会影响土壤结构的稳定,介导土壤中的许多物理、化学和生物过程。因此,了解管理做法对各种土壤健康指标的长期影响对于制定可持续农业做法至关重要。本研究旨在评估内布拉斯加州玉米-大豆轮作条件下,常规耕作和保护性耕作对土壤物理(团聚体)和生化(土壤有机碳[SOC]、酶和微生物生物量)参数的影响。试验在两个地点进行:(1)康科德立地(36年),采用免耕、圆盘犁和犁板犁三种处理;(2)林肯遗址(40年)采用四种耕作方式:NT、双盘、凿子和犁板犁。结果表明,与犁地相比,施NT可显著提高土壤有机碳浓度24% ~ 66%。同样,在林肯地区,与犁板耕作相比,双圆盘耕作增加了54%的土壤有机碳。随着耕作强度的增加,两个地点的芳基硫酸盐酶、β-葡萄糖苷酶、热水和冷水可提取碳、微生物生物量碳和氮浓度均显著降低。这意味着NT增加了这些参数相比,磁盘和犁板犁。然而,0.053 ~ 0.25 mm的团聚体粒度分数(20.8%)是模板犁下唯一高于NT的参数。总体而言,这些长期研究结果表明,在玉米-大豆种植制度下,NT和较少的圆盘耕作减少耕作方式比常规耕作方式更能改善土壤健康,这表明采用可持续农业实践可以改善土壤健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
130
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: SSSA Journal publishes content on soil physics; hydrology; soil chemistry; soil biology; soil biochemistry; soil fertility; plant nutrition; pedology; soil and water conservation and management; forest, range, and wildland soils; soil and plant analysis; soil mineralogy, wetland soils. The audience is researchers, students, soil scientists, hydrologists, pedologist, geologists, agronomists, arborists, ecologists, engineers, certified practitioners, soil microbiologists, and environmentalists. The journal publishes original research, issue papers, reviews, notes, comments and letters to the editor, and book reviews. Invitational papers may be published in the journal if accepted by the editorial board.
期刊最新文献
Automated hanging water column for characterizing water retention and hysteresis of coarse‐textured porous media Influence of plasticity and porewater salinity on shrinkage and water retention characteristics of biochar‐engineered clays Micronutrients in coated phosphate fertilizer improve precision distribution and nutrient use efficiency of soybean No‐till marginally mitigates the impact of harvesting corn stover on soil microbial parameters Soil carbon twelve years after live roots or application of plant residues or manure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1