Decolonizing Higher Education: Historical Myths, Official Discourses, and University Reforms in Brazil

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Encounters in Theory and History of Education Pub Date : 2023-12-20 DOI:10.24908/encounters.v24i0.16592
Naomar De Almeida Filho
{"title":"Decolonizing Higher Education: Historical Myths, Official Discourses, and University Reforms in Brazil","authors":"Naomar De Almeida Filho","doi":"10.24908/encounters.v24i0.16592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From a decolonial perspective, I propose in this paper a critical assessment of the university in Latin America as a social institution which, to fulfill its historical mission, needs to continuously recreate its institutional identity considering subaltern and peripheral economic, political and ideological contexts of coloniality. First, I provide a very brief account of the decolonial thought and its notions of ‘coloniality of power’, ‘coloniality of knowledge’ and ‘coloniality of being’. Secondly, in addition to revisiting historical grand narratives, I present a very brief history of higher education reforms in the Western world, followed by some highlights on the history of university reforms in Brazil. Then I introduce three index-cases of coloniality related to the Brazilian university to illustrate the topic. The first one I call the denial of Georges Cabanis, the second one has been called by historians as the Humboldt Myth, and the third one is a strong statement of my own responsibility: we Brazilians have never been Flexnerians. The specific discussion on how to interpret these emblematic index-cases of coloniality are my closing remarks for opening further debates on strategies and actions for decolonizing the University.","PeriodicalId":41777,"journal":{"name":"Encounters in Theory and History of Education","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Encounters in Theory and History of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/encounters.v24i0.16592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From a decolonial perspective, I propose in this paper a critical assessment of the university in Latin America as a social institution which, to fulfill its historical mission, needs to continuously recreate its institutional identity considering subaltern and peripheral economic, political and ideological contexts of coloniality. First, I provide a very brief account of the decolonial thought and its notions of ‘coloniality of power’, ‘coloniality of knowledge’ and ‘coloniality of being’. Secondly, in addition to revisiting historical grand narratives, I present a very brief history of higher education reforms in the Western world, followed by some highlights on the history of university reforms in Brazil. Then I introduce three index-cases of coloniality related to the Brazilian university to illustrate the topic. The first one I call the denial of Georges Cabanis, the second one has been called by historians as the Humboldt Myth, and the third one is a strong statement of my own responsibility: we Brazilians have never been Flexnerians. The specific discussion on how to interpret these emblematic index-cases of coloniality are my closing remarks for opening further debates on strategies and actions for decolonizing the University.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高等教育的非殖民化:巴西的历史神话、官方论述和大学改革
从非殖民化的视角出发,我在本文中建议对拉丁美洲的大学进行批判性评估,因为大学作为一个社会机构,为了完成其历史使命,需要不断重新塑造其机构身份,同时考虑到殖民时代的次等和边缘经济、政治和意识形态背景。首先,我简要介绍了非殖民主义思想及其 "权力殖民主义"、"知识殖民主义 "和 "存在殖民主义 "的概念。其次,除了重温历史宏大叙事之外,我还简要介绍了西方世界高等教育改革的历史,随后重点介绍了巴西大学改革的历史。然后,我介绍了三个与巴西大学有关的殖民主义案例来说明这一主题。第一个案例我称之为乔治-卡巴尼斯的否定,第二个案例被历史学家称为洪堡神话,第三个案例是我对自己责任的强烈声明:我们巴西人从来就不是弗莱克斯纳人。关于如何解释这些具有象征意义的殖民索引案例的具体讨论是我的结束语,它将开启关于大学非殖民化战略和行动的进一步辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Encounters in Theory and History of Education
Encounters in Theory and History of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Entrevista en inglés - Meta-Education: El intento de superar un marco conceptual politizado en Filosofía de la Educación History in Our Hands. Participatory Methodologies in Curatorial Work at the National History Museum of Chile Towards the Construction of a History of the Schoolbook in Chile (1843-1879): Translation, Appropriation, Adaptation, Imitation, and Self-Production Dictature militaire, réforme universitaire et formation des enseignants au Chili : l'émergence historique d'une structure dysfonctionnelle Decolonizing Higher Education: Historical Myths, Official Discourses, and University Reforms in Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1