{"title":"Usporedba između magnetne rezonancije dojki i\nkontrastne mamografije","authors":"Jelena Teklić, Tatjana Matijaš","doi":"10.48188/hczz.3.2.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Imaging modalities such as contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are used as valuable tools for understanding breast pathology. They enable early detection of breast cancer, provide a precise insi-ght into theslesions, and facilitate the monitoring of responses to treatment. Modern CEM improves the detection of breast abnor-malitiesfusing contrast agents and the combination of higher energy levels in a single examination. MRI uses magnetic fields and coils to produce detailed images of breast tissue in high-risk cases, and to evaluate suspicious findings with other imaging methods using different sequences.Aim of the paper: The aim of the paper is to introduce CEM and MRI separately, while also identifying the strengths and weaknesses of each technique. This will facilitate their direct comparison.Discussion: CEM excels in detecting multifocal or contralateral lesions, assessing response to treatment, and identifying microcalcifications. Combining the power of mammography and contrast, CEM has the disadvantages of higher radiation dose, artifacts, and possible reactions to the use of iodinated contrast agent. In contrast, MRI provides detailed images, better lesion identification and treatment assessment and possesses exceptional contrast for breast soft tissue evaluation. It has proven invalua-ble for assessing implant condition and detecting lesions not seen on mammography images. This is crucial for high-risk cases and hiddenstumours. However, MRI has limitations such as artifacts and cost. CEM is a viable alternative to MRI, with high sensitivity.Conclusion: The combined use of CEM and MRI has the potential to transform breast cancer treatment by improving diagnostic accuracy and enabling more personalized treatment approaches, especially in challenging cases, and among high-risk populations with dense breast tissue. With continued technological advances and standardization efforts, CEM and MRI will continue to play a critical role in early cancer detection, lesion characterization, and treatment monitoring, ultimately improving patient outcomes in the field of breast cancer.","PeriodicalId":240055,"journal":{"name":"Hrvatski časopis zdravstvenih znanosti","volume":"45 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hrvatski časopis zdravstvenih znanosti","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48188/hczz.3.2.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Imaging modalities such as contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are used as valuable tools for understanding breast pathology. They enable early detection of breast cancer, provide a precise insi-ght into theslesions, and facilitate the monitoring of responses to treatment. Modern CEM improves the detection of breast abnor-malitiesfusing contrast agents and the combination of higher energy levels in a single examination. MRI uses magnetic fields and coils to produce detailed images of breast tissue in high-risk cases, and to evaluate suspicious findings with other imaging methods using different sequences.Aim of the paper: The aim of the paper is to introduce CEM and MRI separately, while also identifying the strengths and weaknesses of each technique. This will facilitate their direct comparison.Discussion: CEM excels in detecting multifocal or contralateral lesions, assessing response to treatment, and identifying microcalcifications. Combining the power of mammography and contrast, CEM has the disadvantages of higher radiation dose, artifacts, and possible reactions to the use of iodinated contrast agent. In contrast, MRI provides detailed images, better lesion identification and treatment assessment and possesses exceptional contrast for breast soft tissue evaluation. It has proven invalua-ble for assessing implant condition and detecting lesions not seen on mammography images. This is crucial for high-risk cases and hiddenstumours. However, MRI has limitations such as artifacts and cost. CEM is a viable alternative to MRI, with high sensitivity.Conclusion: The combined use of CEM and MRI has the potential to transform breast cancer treatment by improving diagnostic accuracy and enabling more personalized treatment approaches, especially in challenging cases, and among high-risk populations with dense breast tissue. With continued technological advances and standardization efforts, CEM and MRI will continue to play a critical role in early cancer detection, lesion characterization, and treatment monitoring, ultimately improving patient outcomes in the field of breast cancer.
导言:对比增强乳腺造影术(CEM)和磁共振成像(MRI)等成像模式是了解乳腺病理学的重要工具。它们能早期发现乳腺癌,精确了解病变情况,并有助于监测治疗反应。现代 CEM 通过使用造影剂和在一次检查中结合更高的能量水平,提高了对乳腺异常的检测能力。磁共振成像利用磁场和线圈生成高危病例乳腺组织的详细图像,并利用不同序列的其他成像方法对可疑结果进行评估:本文旨在分别介绍 CEM 和 MRI,同时明确两种技术的优缺点。讨论:讨论:CEM 擅长检测多灶或对侧病灶、评估治疗反应和识别微小钙化。CEM结合了乳腺放射摄影和造影剂的优点,但缺点是辐射剂量较高、存在伪影以及使用碘化造影剂可能引起的反应。相比之下,核磁共振成像可提供详细的图像,更好地识别病灶和评估治疗效果,并在乳腺软组织评估方面具有卓越的对比度。事实证明,磁共振成像在评估植入物状况和检测乳房 X 线照相术图像上未发现的病变方面非常有效。这对高危病例和隐匿性肿瘤至关重要。然而,核磁共振成像存在伪影和成本等局限性。CEM 是磁共振成像的一种可行替代方法,灵敏度高:结论:CEM 和核磁共振成像的联合使用有可能通过提高诊断准确性和实现更个性化的治疗方法来改变乳腺癌的治疗,尤其是在具有挑战性的病例和乳腺组织致密的高危人群中。随着技术的不断进步和标准化的努力,CEM 和 MRI 将继续在早期癌症检测、病变特征描述和治疗监测方面发挥关键作用,最终改善乳腺癌领域的患者预后。