The Kehler Management System®: Integration of External Stakeholders in the Quality Assessments of Municipal Administrations

Roland Böhmer, U. Busbach, Britta Kiesel
{"title":"The Kehler Management System®: Integration of External Stakeholders in the Quality Assessments of Municipal Administrations","authors":"Roland Böhmer, U. Busbach, Britta Kiesel","doi":"10.2478/jec-2023-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Research purpose The Kehler Management System (KMS) is a tool for assessing quality in municipalities. Due to technological advancements, globalisation, greater market dynamics, changing values and demographic change, municipalities find themselves in a complex and dynamic field of tension. The diversity and complexity of these fields of activity and relationship structures continue to increase, making it difficult for municipalities to adapt their processes. However, in the first stage, the focus of KMS was limited to the internal perspective of the municipal administration. This was coherent in terms of an initially necessary reduction of complexity, but in terms of a holistic view, this is insufficient. Following the successful introduction of the KMS for quality assessment in the internal structure of public administration, the concept is being expanded to include the external perspective of stakeholders. The question is: “How can the satisfaction of various stakeholder groups in the municipality be measured in a way that incurs significant participation and produces relevant results for the decision-makers in the municipality?” Design / Methodology / Approach The research design takes the form of a case study and focuses on the municipality of Ottersweier. The basis for developing the external perspective is determining the stakeholder groups interacting with a municipality. Six stakeholder groups are identified: Residents, local businesses, business partners of the administration, capital providers of the administration, civil society actors such as associations, clubs and interest groups, and corporations and institutions under public law, e.g. neighbouring municipalities. In analogy to the KMS's approach to the municipal administration's internal perspective, the first step is identifying impact factors grouped into success clusters. To assess the impact factors, questions relevant to the impact factors are developed. Questionnaires were developed and tested for the stakeholder group of residents, local businesses and clubs. All questionnaires were tested in the Ottersweier community. Findings: The survey brought about significant results that aligned with the staff's experience in the municipality. Local businesses indicated a \"General Satisfaction\" of 81%. They were especially satisfied with the work of the administration. The impact cluster is considered to be fulfilled. However, 18 companies indicated a willingness to relocate out of the municipality for other reasons. The survey of the clubs showed a high level of satisfaction with the service quality of the municipality for this stakeholder group. The general satisfaction of the clubs was 98%. The evaluation of the residents' views showed that the two impact clusters, \"General satisfaction\" and \"Administration,\" were above the 80% hurdle. The results for the impact clusters \"Municipal Policy\" and \"Supply and Infrastructure\"were noteworthy. Both the survey of residents and local businesses obviously failed to meet the KMS target of 80% effectiveness for these two impact clusters. A closer examination of the detailed questions revealed that both stakeholder groups perceive the same areas as particularly deficient: communication and implementation of the municipal council's mission statement and public transport. Originality / Value / Practical implications In previous surveys of residents in various municipalities without using the KMS, the participation of residents was so low that only limited conclusions could be drawn about the quality of municipal services. Therefore, an attempt was made to keep the number of questions to residents as low as possible to increase the survey's acceptance. The response rate was significantly expanded concerning the number of residents compared to previous surveys. Since two stakeholder groups perceived two areas as deficient independently of each other, \"Municipal Policy\" and \"Supply and Infrastructure\", the municipality of Ottersweier must conduct a weakness analysis in order to develop a plan for action to improve the services. Semi-structured, qualitative interviews with residents can be used for this analysis. Also, the motives for local businesses to consider relocation should be investigated in more detail.","PeriodicalId":500929,"journal":{"name":"Economics and Culture","volume":"522 2","pages":"32 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jec-2023-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Research purpose The Kehler Management System (KMS) is a tool for assessing quality in municipalities. Due to technological advancements, globalisation, greater market dynamics, changing values and demographic change, municipalities find themselves in a complex and dynamic field of tension. The diversity and complexity of these fields of activity and relationship structures continue to increase, making it difficult for municipalities to adapt their processes. However, in the first stage, the focus of KMS was limited to the internal perspective of the municipal administration. This was coherent in terms of an initially necessary reduction of complexity, but in terms of a holistic view, this is insufficient. Following the successful introduction of the KMS for quality assessment in the internal structure of public administration, the concept is being expanded to include the external perspective of stakeholders. The question is: “How can the satisfaction of various stakeholder groups in the municipality be measured in a way that incurs significant participation and produces relevant results for the decision-makers in the municipality?” Design / Methodology / Approach The research design takes the form of a case study and focuses on the municipality of Ottersweier. The basis for developing the external perspective is determining the stakeholder groups interacting with a municipality. Six stakeholder groups are identified: Residents, local businesses, business partners of the administration, capital providers of the administration, civil society actors such as associations, clubs and interest groups, and corporations and institutions under public law, e.g. neighbouring municipalities. In analogy to the KMS's approach to the municipal administration's internal perspective, the first step is identifying impact factors grouped into success clusters. To assess the impact factors, questions relevant to the impact factors are developed. Questionnaires were developed and tested for the stakeholder group of residents, local businesses and clubs. All questionnaires were tested in the Ottersweier community. Findings: The survey brought about significant results that aligned with the staff's experience in the municipality. Local businesses indicated a "General Satisfaction" of 81%. They were especially satisfied with the work of the administration. The impact cluster is considered to be fulfilled. However, 18 companies indicated a willingness to relocate out of the municipality for other reasons. The survey of the clubs showed a high level of satisfaction with the service quality of the municipality for this stakeholder group. The general satisfaction of the clubs was 98%. The evaluation of the residents' views showed that the two impact clusters, "General satisfaction" and "Administration," were above the 80% hurdle. The results for the impact clusters "Municipal Policy" and "Supply and Infrastructure"were noteworthy. Both the survey of residents and local businesses obviously failed to meet the KMS target of 80% effectiveness for these two impact clusters. A closer examination of the detailed questions revealed that both stakeholder groups perceive the same areas as particularly deficient: communication and implementation of the municipal council's mission statement and public transport. Originality / Value / Practical implications In previous surveys of residents in various municipalities without using the KMS, the participation of residents was so low that only limited conclusions could be drawn about the quality of municipal services. Therefore, an attempt was made to keep the number of questions to residents as low as possible to increase the survey's acceptance. The response rate was significantly expanded concerning the number of residents compared to previous surveys. Since two stakeholder groups perceived two areas as deficient independently of each other, "Municipal Policy" and "Supply and Infrastructure", the municipality of Ottersweier must conduct a weakness analysis in order to develop a plan for action to improve the services. Semi-structured, qualitative interviews with residents can be used for this analysis. Also, the motives for local businesses to consider relocation should be investigated in more detail.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
克勒管理系统®:外部利益相关者参与市政管理质量评估
摘要 研究目的 克勒管理系统(KMS)是评估市政质量的工具。由于技术进步、全球化、更大的市场活力、不断变化的价值观和人口变化,市政当局发现自己处于一个复杂多变的紧张领域。这些活动领域和关系结构的多样性和复杂性不断增加,使得市政当局难以调整其流程。然而,在第一阶段,KMS 的重点仅限于市政管理的内部视角。这在最初必要地降低复杂性方面是一致的,但从整体上看,这是不够的。在成功地将质量评估关键绩效管理系统引入公共行政内部结构之后,这一概念正 在扩展到利益相关者的外部视角。问题是:"如何以一种能吸引大量参与并为市政当局决策者提供相关结果的方式来衡量市政当局各利益相关群体的满意度?设计/方法/途径 研究设计采用案例研究的形式,重点关注奥特斯魏尔市。研究外部视角的基础是确定与市政当局互动的利益相关者群体。我们确定了六个利益相关群体:居民、当地企业、行政机构的商业伙伴、行政机构的资本提供者、民间社会行动者(如协会、俱乐部和利益集团)以及公司和公法机构(如邻近市政当局)。与 KMS 从市政当局内部角度出发的方法类似,第一步是确定影响因素,并将其归类为成功群组。为了评估这些影响因素,需要提出与影响因素相关的问题。针对居民、当地企业和俱乐部等利益相关者群体编制并测试了调查问卷。所有问卷均在奥特斯维尔社区进行了测试。调查结果:调查得出的重要结果与工作人员在该市的经验相吻合。当地企业的 "总体满意度 "为 81%。他们对行政部门的工作尤为满意。影响集群被认为已经实现。不过,有 18 家公司表示愿意出于其他原因迁出该市。对俱乐部的调查显示,该利益相关群体对市政服务质量的满意度很高。俱乐部的总体满意度为 98%。对居民意见的评估表明,"总体满意度 "和 "行政管理 "这两个影响群组都超过了 80% 的标准。市政政策 "和 "供应和基础设施 "这两个影响群组的结果值得注意。在这两个影响群组中,对居民和当地企业的调查显然都没有达到 KMS 规定的 80% 有效率的目标。对详细问题的仔细研究表明,这两个利益相关者群体都认为同样的领域存在特别不足:市议会使命宣言的沟通和实施以及公共交通。原创性/价值/实践意义 在以往未使用 KMS 的各市居民调查中,居民的参与度非常低,因此只能就市政服务质量得出有限的结论。因此,为了提高调查的可接受性,我们尝试尽可能减少向居民提出的问题数量。与以往的调查相比,居民的回复率明显提高。由于两个利益相关群体分别认为 "市政政策 "和 "供应与基础设施 "这两个领域存在不足,奥特斯魏尔市政府必须进行不足分析,以制定改善服务的行动计划。在进行分析时,可以对居民进行半结构化的定性访谈。此外,还应对当地企业考虑搬迁的动机进行更详细的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Understanding the Consumer Dynamics of AI in North Macedonian E-Business The Kehler Management System®: Integration of External Stakeholders in the Quality Assessments of Municipal Administrations Incorporating Art Events Into Marketing Activities - Good Practice By European Zoos The Moderating Role of Governance in the Globalisation-Life Expectancy Nexus: Implications for Socioeconomic Development Use of Movable Cultural Heritage Through Libraries in Slovakia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1