{"title":"The ho-V construction in Taiwanese Southern Min and the degree-introducing morpheme\n ho and u","authors":"Chen-Sheng Luther Liu","doi":"10.1075/ijchl.00014.liu","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this study, I first provide an in-depth study on the TSM ho-V construction with a monosyllabic\n V, especially on the morpho-syntactic function and the degree-introducing function of the morpheme ho\n ‘hoVD’. Then, based on Liu’s (2020) study on the TSM\n u-V construction, I comprehensively compare these two constructions, which reaches two major points. First, the\n ho-V sequence and the u-V sequence are intransitive compound verb. The V that\n u ‘uVD’ merges with can be a lexical verb or an aspectual verb; however, the V that\n ho ‘hoVD’ merges with must be a lexical verb. When forming a compound verb with a lexical verb,\n u ‘uVD’ has the same morpho-syntactic function as ho ‘hoVD’. Second,\n these two morphemes differ in how to introduce the degree meaning for their corresponding construction. Namely, the dimension of\n measurement carried by the measure function introduced by u ‘uVD’ is determined by what is measured;\n however, the morpheme ho ‘hoVD’ intrinsically carries a dimension of measurement. Depending on what\n the morpheme ho ‘hoVD’ modifies is the entity denoted by the subject in question or the eventuality\n argument of V, the dimension of measurement carried by it can be interpreted as ‘be good for one to V’ or ‘it is easy for one to\n V’.","PeriodicalId":41020,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chinese Linguistics","volume":"64 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chinese Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.00014.liu","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this study, I first provide an in-depth study on the TSM ho-V construction with a monosyllabic
V, especially on the morpho-syntactic function and the degree-introducing function of the morpheme ho
‘hoVD’. Then, based on Liu’s (2020) study on the TSM
u-V construction, I comprehensively compare these two constructions, which reaches two major points. First, the
ho-V sequence and the u-V sequence are intransitive compound verb. The V that
u ‘uVD’ merges with can be a lexical verb or an aspectual verb; however, the V that
ho ‘hoVD’ merges with must be a lexical verb. When forming a compound verb with a lexical verb,
u ‘uVD’ has the same morpho-syntactic function as ho ‘hoVD’. Second,
these two morphemes differ in how to introduce the degree meaning for their corresponding construction. Namely, the dimension of
measurement carried by the measure function introduced by u ‘uVD’ is determined by what is measured;
however, the morpheme ho ‘hoVD’ intrinsically carries a dimension of measurement. Depending on what
the morpheme ho ‘hoVD’ modifies is the entity denoted by the subject in question or the eventuality
argument of V, the dimension of measurement carried by it can be interpreted as ‘be good for one to V’ or ‘it is easy for one to
V’.
在本研究中,我首先对带有单音节 V 的 TSM ho-V 结构进行了深入研究,尤其是对语素 ho "hoVD "的形态句法功能和程度引申功能进行了研究。然后,笔者在刘晓明(2020)对 TSM u-V 结构研究的基础上,对这两种结构进行了综合比较,得出了两个要点。首先,ho-V 顺序和 u-V 顺序都是不及物复合动词。u'uVD'合并的V可以是词性动词,也可以是方面动词;而ho'hoVD'合并的V必须是词性动词。在与词性动词构成复合动词时,u 'uVD' 与 ho 'hoVD' 具有相同的形态句法功能。其次,这两个词素在如何为其相应的结构引入度量意义上是不同的。也就是说,u'uVD'引入的度量功能所承载的度量维度是由被度量的内容决定的;而语素ho'hoVD'则内在地承载着度量维度。根据语素 ho 'hoVD' 所修饰的是主语所表示的实体还是 V 的事件论据,它所携带的测量维度可以被解释为'对一个人来说 V 是好的'或'对一个人来说 V 是容易的'。