Step Length Is a More Reliable Measurement Than Walking Speed for Pedestrian Dead-Reckoning.

Fatemeh Elyasi, Roberto Manduchi
{"title":"Step Length Is a More Reliable Measurement Than Walking Speed for Pedestrian Dead-Reckoning.","authors":"Fatemeh Elyasi, Roberto Manduchi","doi":"10.1109/ipin57070.2023.10332483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pedestrian dead reckoning (PDR) relies on the estimation of the length of each step taken by the walker in a path from inertial data (e.g. as recorded by a smartphone). Existing algorithms either estimate step lengths directly, or predict walking speed, which can then be integrated over a step period to obtain step length. We present an analysis, using a common architecture formed by an LSTM followed by four fully connected layers, of the quality of reconstruction when predicting step length vs. walking speed. Our experiments, conducted on a data set collected by twelve participants, strongly suggest that step length can be predicted more reliably than average walking speed over each step.</p>","PeriodicalId":510887,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation : [proceedings]. International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation","volume":"2023 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10752414/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation : [proceedings]. International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ipin57070.2023.10332483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pedestrian dead reckoning (PDR) relies on the estimation of the length of each step taken by the walker in a path from inertial data (e.g. as recorded by a smartphone). Existing algorithms either estimate step lengths directly, or predict walking speed, which can then be integrated over a step period to obtain step length. We present an analysis, using a common architecture formed by an LSTM followed by four fully connected layers, of the quality of reconstruction when predicting step length vs. walking speed. Our experiments, conducted on a data set collected by twelve participants, strongly suggest that step length can be predicted more reliably than average walking speed over each step.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
步长是比步行速度更可靠的行人死角测量方法。
行人惯性推算(PDR)依靠惯性数据(如智能手机记录的数据)估算步行者在路径上每一步的长度。现有的算法要么直接估算步长,要么预测行走速度,然后将行走速度与步长周期进行整合,得出步长。我们使用一个由 LSTM 和四个全连接层组成的通用架构,对预测步长与步行速度时的重构质量进行了分析。我们在 12 名参与者收集的数据集上进行了实验,结果强烈表明,预测步长比预测每一步的平均步行速度更可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Step Length Is a More Reliable Measurement Than Walking Speed for Pedestrian Dead-Reckoning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1