Trends in cervical cancer screening in Norway 2012-2017: a comparison study of non-immigrant and immigrant women.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Scandinavian Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-02 DOI:10.1177/14034948231217636
Marta Røttingen Enden, Kathy Møen, Jannicke Igland, Esperanza Diaz
{"title":"Trends in cervical cancer screening in Norway 2012-2017: a comparison study of non-immigrant and immigrant women.","authors":"Marta Røttingen Enden, Kathy Møen, Jannicke Igland, Esperanza Diaz","doi":"10.1177/14034948231217636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Immigrant women in Norway have lower cervical cancer screening participation than non-immigrant women. Our aim in this study was to assess whether the observed increase in screening participation during 2012-2017 was different between Norwegian-born women and immigrant women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from three national registries. The study included 1,409,561 women, categorized according to country of birth and immigrant background: (i) Norway, Norwegian parents; (ii) Norway, immigrant parent(s); (iii) Europe, excluding Norway; (iv) Africa; (v) Asia, including Turkey; and (vi) other countries. Trends and differences between groups were analyzed using Poisson regression analyses with adjustments for variables other studies have found to influence screening participation. Trends were assessed by including half-years as a continuous variable in the models and reported as prevalence ratios with 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Screening participation increased in all groups, but was not statistically significant among women from Africa in the adjusted model. The highest increase was among Norwegian women, with a 2.2% increase per year. Interaction tests showed significantly smaller increases in screening among women born in Europe (<i>p</i> interaction < 0.0001), Africa (<i>p</i> interaction < 0.0001), Asia (<i>p</i> interaction < 0.0001), and countries in the \"Other\" category (<i>p</i> interaction = 0.004). There was also a smaller increase among Norwegian-born women with one or more immigrant parent(s), but this was not significant (<i>p</i> interaction = 0.178).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>\n <b>The gap in screening participation and the increasing differences in trends suggest that healthcare services do not reach all women in Norway to the same extent. One should attempt to improve this while working toward further increasing screening participation for all.</b>\n </p>","PeriodicalId":49568,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"927-933"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11626844/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948231217636","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Immigrant women in Norway have lower cervical cancer screening participation than non-immigrant women. Our aim in this study was to assess whether the observed increase in screening participation during 2012-2017 was different between Norwegian-born women and immigrant women.

Methods: Data were collected from three national registries. The study included 1,409,561 women, categorized according to country of birth and immigrant background: (i) Norway, Norwegian parents; (ii) Norway, immigrant parent(s); (iii) Europe, excluding Norway; (iv) Africa; (v) Asia, including Turkey; and (vi) other countries. Trends and differences between groups were analyzed using Poisson regression analyses with adjustments for variables other studies have found to influence screening participation. Trends were assessed by including half-years as a continuous variable in the models and reported as prevalence ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: Screening participation increased in all groups, but was not statistically significant among women from Africa in the adjusted model. The highest increase was among Norwegian women, with a 2.2% increase per year. Interaction tests showed significantly smaller increases in screening among women born in Europe (p interaction < 0.0001), Africa (p interaction < 0.0001), Asia (p interaction < 0.0001), and countries in the "Other" category (p interaction = 0.004). There was also a smaller increase among Norwegian-born women with one or more immigrant parent(s), but this was not significant (p interaction = 0.178).

Conclusions: The gap in screening participation and the increasing differences in trends suggest that healthcare services do not reach all women in Norway to the same extent. One should attempt to improve this while working toward further increasing screening participation for all.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2012-2017年挪威宫颈癌筛查趋势:非移民和移民妇女比较研究。
目的:与非移民妇女相比,挪威移民妇女的宫颈癌筛查参与率较低。本研究旨在评估2012-2017年期间观察到的筛查参与率增长情况在挪威出生的妇女和移民妇女之间是否存在差异:方法:从三个国家登记处收集数据。研究包括1409561名妇女,根据出生国和移民背景进行分类:(i) 挪威,父母均为挪威人;(ii) 挪威,父母均为移民;(iii) 欧洲,不包括挪威;(iv) 非洲;(v) 亚洲,包括土耳其;(vi) 其他国家。采用泊松回归分析法对各组之间的趋势和差异进行了分析,并对其他研究发现的影响筛查参与度的变量进行了调整。通过将半年作为连续变量纳入模型来评估趋势,并以患病率比和 95% 置信区间进行报告:结果:所有群体的筛查参与率都有所上升,但在调整后的模型中,非洲妇女的筛查参与率在统计学上并不显著。挪威妇女的增幅最大,每年增加2.2%。交互测试表明,欧洲出生的妇女接受筛查的增幅明显较小(交互 p 交互 p 交互 p 交互 p 交互 = 0.004)。父母一方或多方为移民的挪威出生妇女中,筛查率的增幅也较小,但并不显著(交互作用 p = 0.178): 参与筛查方面的差距和日益扩大的趋势差异表明,挪威并非所有妇女都能享受到同等程度的医疗保健服务。在努力进一步提高筛查参与率的同时,应尝试改善这一状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Public Health is an international peer-reviewed journal which has a vision to: publish public health research of good quality; contribute to the conceptual and methodological development of public health; contribute to global health issues; contribute to news and overviews of public health developments and health policy developments in the Nordic countries; reflect the multidisciplinarity of public health.
期刊最新文献
A taste of ambrosia: Do Olympic medalists live longer than Olympic losers? The diagnosis of cerebral palsy in two Danish national registries: a validation study. Meaningfulness and mortality: exploring the sense of coherence in Eastern Finnish men. What is wellness? Investigating the importance of different domains of wellness among laypeople and experts: A survey study. Validation of the short version of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for adolescents in Norway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1